IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirpro/1999rp-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intervention Centrale en matière de Finances Locales

Author

Listed:
  • Véronique Le Gallo
  • Nicolas Marceau

Abstract

Quebec municipalities face a critical financial crisis. Both their main sources of income, (governmental transfers and land taxes) are diminishing while demands from taxpayers multiply. The 80's economic crisis has slowed down the growth rate of commercial and industrial investments, thus reducing the sources of income. Moreover, since higher governments prioritise deficit reduction, intergovernmental transfers towards municipalities have been reduced. This situation is not particular to Quebec, all over the world, municipalities have taken on a greater number of responsibilities and have witnessed serious reduction in their budgets. In this report, we examine the measures taken by central governments in response to the difficult financial standing of municipalities. The report is divided into six parts, each one analyzing, from an economic standpoint, the measures undertaken by central governments in response to municipal financial problems. We discuss issues such as municipal mergers, control of municipal debt, taxes in general, the concept of user/payer, municipal equalization and competition between municipalities. Les municipalités québécoises font désormais face à une période critique du point de vue financier. Leurs deux sources de revenus traditionnels, transferts gouvernementaux et impôts fonciers, s'appauvrissent pendant que les demandes des contribuables se multiplient. La crise économique a fait ralentir le taux de croissance des investissements commerciaux et industriels, réduisant ainsi l'assiette fiscale locale et les sources de revenus propres. De plus, chaque niveau de gouvernement supérieur ayant mis la priorité sur la réduction de leur déficit, les transferts intergouvernementaux vers les municipalités ont été réduits. Mais cette situation n'est pas particulière au Québec. Partout dans le monde, les municipalités se sont vues imposer un plus grand nombre de responsabilités depuis la seconde guerre mondiale, et elles ont vu leur budget être réduit depuis les années 80. Nous examinons donc, dans ce rapport, les mesures prises par les gouvernements centraux en réponse à la situation financière difficile des municipalités et aux impératifs d'autant plus grands d'une gestion efficace. Le rapport se divise en six parties, chacune analysant, du point de vue économique, des mesures entreprises par les gouvernements centraux en réponse aux problèmes financiers municipaux. Ces six parties portent donc sur le regroupement municipal, le contrôle de la dette municipale, l'assiette fiscale en général, l'utilisation de la tarification à l'usager, la péréquation municipale et la concurrence entre municipalités. Chaque partie expose en premier lieu les avantages et les inconvénients de chaque mesure puis tente de tirer quelques conclusions pertinentes au cas du Québec grâce aux études empiriques.

Suggested Citation

  • Véronique Le Gallo & Nicolas Marceau, 1999. "Intervention Centrale en matière de Finances Locales," CIRANO Project Reports 1999rp-07, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:1999rp-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/1999RP-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen M. Miller & Frank S. Russek, 1997. "Fiscal Structures and Economic Growth at the State and Local Level," Public Finance Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 213-237, March.
    2. Timothy J. Bartik, 1999. "Federal Policy Toward State and Local Economic Development in the 1990s," Book chapters authored by Upjohn Institute researchers, in: RD Norton (ed.),The Millennial City: Classic Readings on U.S. Urban Policy, volume 12, pages 235-251, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    3. Paul B. Downing, 1992. "The Revenue Potential of User Charges in Municipal Finance," Public Finance Review, , vol. 20(4), pages 512-527, October.
    4. Jack Mintz & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Commodity Tax Competition Between Member States of a Federation: Equilibrium and Efficiency," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 449-489, Springer.
    5. Mofidi, Alaeddin & Stone, Joe A, 1990. "Do State and Local Taxes Affect Economic Growth?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(4), pages 686-691, November.
    6. Roy Bahl & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & David L. Sjoquist, 1992. "Central City-Suburban Fiscal Disparities," Public Finance Review, , vol. 20(4), pages 420-432, October.
    7. Helms, L Jay, 1985. "The Effect of State and Local Taxes on Economic Growth: A Time Series-Cross Section Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(4), pages 574-582, November.
    8. Miller, Stephen M & Russek, Frank S, 1997. "Fiscal Structures and Economic Growth: International Evidence," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 35(3), pages 603-613, July.
    9. Ladd, Helen F, 1990. "State Assistance to Local Governments: Changes during the 1980s," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 171-175, May.
    10. Thierry Madiès, 1997. "Concurrence fiscale et intercommunalité," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 63(1), pages 195-228.
    11. Dick Netzer, 1992. "Differences in Reliance On User Charges By American State and Local Governments," Public Finance Review, , vol. 20(4), pages 499-511, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Robert Reed, 2009. "The Determinants Of U.S. State Economic Growth: A Less Extreme Bounds Analysis," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 47(4), pages 685-700, October.
    2. Norman Gemmell & Joey Au, 2013. "Government size, fiscal policy and the level and growth of output: a review of recent evidence," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 203-229.
    3. Kneller, Richard & Bleaney, Michael F. & Gemmell, Norman, 1999. "Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 171-190, November.
    4. W. Robert Reed & Cynthia L. Rogers, 2005. "Tax Cuts and Employment Growth in New Jersey: Lessons From a Regional Analysis," Urban/Regional 0506010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Alban Elshani & Leke Pula, 2023. "Impact of Taxes on Economic Growth: An Empirical Study in the Eurozone," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 24-41.
    6. Andrew Ojede & Bebonchu Atems & Steven Yamarik, 2018. "The Direct and Indirect (Spillover) Effects of Productive Government Spending on State Economic Growth," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 122-141, March.
    7. Emilian DOBRESCU, 2016. "Controversies over the Size of the Public Budget," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 5-34, December.
    8. Norman Gemmell & Joey Au, 2013. "Government size, fiscal policy and the level and growth of output: a review of recent evidence," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 203-229.
    9. W. Robert Reed & Cynthia L. Rogers, 2004. "Tax Cuts and Employment in New Jersey: Lessons From a Regional Analysis," Public Finance Review, , vol. 32(3), pages 269-291, May.
    10. Sanz Labrador, Ismael & Sanz-Sanz, José Félix, 2013. "Política fiscal y crecimiento económico: consideraciones microeconómicas y relaciones macroeconómicas," Macroeconomía del Desarrollo 5367, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    11. Wallace E. Oates & Wallace E. Oates, 2004. "Fiscal Competition and European Union: Contrasting Perspectives," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 10, pages 182-194, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Andrea Bassanini & Stefano Scarpetta, 2003. "The Driving Forces of Economic Growth: Panel Data Evidence for the OECD Countries," OECD Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2001(2), pages 9-56.
    13. António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio, 2021. "Structural Tax Reforms and Public Spending Efficiency," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1017-1061, November.
    14. Lori L. Taylor & Stephen P. A. Brown, 2006. "The Private Sector Impact Of State And Local Government: Has More Become Bad?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 24(4), pages 548-562, October.
    15. Santos, Marcelo Rodrigues dos & Pereira, Thiago Neves, 2010. "Moving to a Consumption-Based Tax System: A Quantitative Assessment for Brazil," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 64(2), June.
    16. Harvie, Charles & Saleh, Ali Salman, 2008. "Lebanon's economic reconstruction after the war: A bridge too far?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 857-872.
    17. Stephen M. Miller & Frank S. Russek, 2003. "The Relationship Between Large Fiscal Adjustments And Short‐Term Output Growth Under Alternative Fiscal Policy Regimes," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 21(1), pages 41-58, January.
    18. Timothy J. Bartik, "undated". "Discussion [of the Effects of State and Local Public Services on Economic Development by Ronald C. Fisher]," Upjohn Working Papers tjb1997, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    19. de Bartolome, Charles A. M. & Spiegel, Mark M., 1997. "Does State Economic Development Spending Increase Manufacturing Employment?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 153-175, March.
    20. Nazila Alinaghi & W. Robert Reed, 2021. "Taxes and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: A Meta-analysis," Public Finance Review, , vol. 49(1), pages 3-40, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:1999rp-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.