IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp1363.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Opacity in Financial Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Yuki Sato

    (University of Lausanne - School of Economics and Business Administration (HEC-Lausanne))

Abstract

This paper studies the implications of opacity in fi nancial markets for investor behavior, asset prices, and welfare. Transparent funds (e.g. mutual funds) and opaque funds (e.g. hedge funds) trade transparent assets (e.g. plain-vanilla products) and opaque assets (e.g. structured products). Investors can observe neither opaque funds' portfolios nor opaque assets' payo ffs. Consistent with empirical observations, an "opacity price premium" arises: opaque assets trade at a premium over transparent ones despite identical payoff s. This accompanies endogenous market segmentation: transparent (opaque) funds trade only transparent (opaque) assets. The opacity price premium incentivizes fi nancial engineers to render transparent assets opaque deliberately.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuki Sato, 2013. "Opacity in Financial Markets," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 13-63, Swiss Finance Institute, revised Jun 2014.
    • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2371384
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Célérier, Claire & Vallée, Boris, 2016. "Catering to investors through product complexity," ESRB Working Paper Series 14, European Systemic Risk Board.
    2. Sato, Yuki, 2016. "Delegated portfolio management, optimal fee contracts, and asset prices," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 360-389.
    3. Yuexin Li & Xiaoyin Ma & Luc Renneboog, 2024. "In Art We Trust," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 98-127, January.
    4. Ashton, John K. & Hudson, Robert S., 2017. "The price, quality and distribution of mortgage payment protection insurance: A hedonic pricing approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 242-255.
    5. Jungherr, Joachim, 2018. "Bank opacity and financial crises," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 157-176.
    6. Rubtsov, Alexey, 2016. "Model misspecification and pricing of illiquid claims," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 242-249.
    7. Olena Havrylchyk, 2018. "Regulatory framework for the loan-based crowdfunding platforms," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1513, OECD Publishing.
    8. Flávia Januzzi & Aureliano Bressan & Fernando Moreira, 2020. "Opacity, Risk, Performance and Inflows in Hedge Funds," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 24(1), pages 77-99.
    9. Stenzel, A. & Wagner, W.B., 2013. "Asset Opacity and Liquidity," Discussion Paper 2013-066, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Bożena Frączek, 2020. "A System to Support the Transparency of Consumer Credit Offers," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Fuess, Roland & Ruf, Daniel, 2015. "Pre-Trade Transparency and Return Co-movements in Commercial Real Estate Markets," Working Papers on Finance 1520, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance, revised Jan 2017.
    12. Galanis, Spyros, 2018. "Financial complexity and trade," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 219-230.
    13. André Stenzel & Wolf Wagner, 2022. "Opacity, liquidity and disclosure requirements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5-6), pages 658-689, May.
    14. Jungherr, Joachim, 2016. "Bank opacity and financial crises," Economics Working Papers ADE2016/02, European University Institute.
    15. Martin Hibbeln & Werner Osterkamp, 2024. "Simple is simply not enough—features versus labels of complex financial securities," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 113-150, July.
    16. Wagner, Wolf & Uras, Burak, 2017. "Efficient Lemons," CEPR Discussion Papers 11803, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.