IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_8097.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PRC Industrial Policies Postdate Rather Than Lead Economic Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten A. Holz

Abstract

Industrial policies are widely credited with upgrading the economic structure of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and advancing its economy towards and beyond the current technological frontier. Yet the data suggest that the PRC’s economy-wide investment patterns—with investment embodying technological progress—are largely divorced from industrial policies, and, if anything, predate them. The significant shifts in investment across sectors and ownership forms that have taken place since the early 2000s are driven more by profitability considerations and private entrepreneurship than by government policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten A. Holz, 2020. "PRC Industrial Policies Postdate Rather Than Lead Economic Activity," CESifo Working Paper Series 8097, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8097.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrik, Dani, 2004. "Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century," Working Paper Series rwp04-047, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Tristan Kenderdine, 2017. "China's Industrial Policy, Strategic Emerging Industries and Space Law," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 325-342, May.
    3. Jonathan Eberle & Philipp Boeing, 2019. "Effects of R&D subsidies on regional economic dynamics: Evidence from Chinese provinces," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2019-03, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    4. Huang, Yasheng, 1996. "Central-local relations in china during the reform era: The economic and institutional dimensions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 655-672, April.
    5. Yiyun Wu & Xiwei Zhu & Nicolaas Groenewold, 2016. "The Determinants And Effectiveness Of Industrial Policy In China: A Study Based On Five-Year Plans," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 16-21, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    6. Amsden, Alice H., 1994. "Why isn't the whole world experimenting with the East Asian model to develop?: Review of the East Asian miracle," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 627-633, April.
    7. Tristan Kenderdine, 2017. "China's Industrial Policy, Strategic Emerging Industries and Space Law," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201724, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    8. Wu, Yiyun & Zhu, Xiwei & Groenewold, Nicolaas, 2019. "The determinants and effectiveness of industrial policy in china: A study based on Five-Year Plans," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 225-242.
    9. Robert Wade, 1988. "State Intervention in ‘Outward-looking’ Development: Neoclassical Theory and Taiwanese Practice," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Gordon White (ed.), Developmental States in East Asia, chapter 2, pages 30-67, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Nicholas R. Lardy, 2014. "Markets over Mao: The Rise of Private Business in China," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 6932, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbieri, Elisa & Huang, Manli & Pi, Shenglei & Pollio, Chiara & Rubini, Lauretta, 2021. "Investigating the linkages between industrial policies and M&A dynamics: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Shengli Dai & Weimin Zhang & Yingying Wang & Ge Wang, 2022. "Examining the Impact of Regional Development Policy on Industrial Structure Upgrading: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Javier Reyes & Stefano Schiavo & Giorgio Fagiolo, 2010. "Using complex networks analysis to assess the evolution of international economic integration: The cases of East Asia and Latin America," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 215-239.
    4. Pingkuo, Liu & Yi, Gao, 2019. "Graphene's potential in the future industrial development of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 118-127.
    5. Kirkulak-Uludag, Berna & Safarzadeh, Omid, 2021. "Exploring shock and volatility transmission between oil and Chinese industrial raw materials," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Helen Shapiro, 2007. "Industrial Policy and Growth," Working Papers 53, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    7. Shu Ling Lin & Jun Lu & Jung-Bin Su & Wei-Peng Chen, 2018. "Sustainable Returns: The Effect of Regional Industrial Development Policy on Institutional Investors’ Behavior in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Shafaeddin, Mehdi, 2010. "Trade liberalization, industrialization and development; experience of recent decades," MPRA Paper 26355, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Manuel R. Agosin, 1997. "Export Performance in Chile: Lessons for Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1997-144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Inayat U. Mangla & Muslehud Din, 2015. "The Impact of the Macroeconomic Environment on Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 241-260, September.
    11. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Li, Jiaming & Li, Yuheng & Zhang, Wenzhong & Yu, Jianhui, 2018. "Imbalanced ownership transformation and land use within an urban area: a case study of Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 240-247.
    13. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    14. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    15. Huck-ju Kwon, 2007. "Transforming the developmental welfare states in East Asia," Working Papers 40, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    16. Elvira Uyarra & Jens Sörvik & Inger Midtkandal, 2014. "Inter-regional Collaboration in Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). S3 Working Paper Series no 6/2014," JRC Research Reports JRC91963, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Nicholas Lardy, 2016. "The Changing Role of the Private Sector in China," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Iris Day & John Simon (ed.),Structural Change in China: Implications for Australia and the World, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    18. Meiran Zhiyenbayev & Nadezhda Kunicina & Madina Mansurova & Antons Patlins & Jelena Caiko & Vladimir Beliaev & Roberts Grants & Martins Bisenieks & Guldana Shyntore, 2024. "Development of Aggregated Sustainability Indicators for Quality of Life Evaluations in Urban Areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    19. Tim Kelsall, 2012. "Neo-Patrimonialism, Rent-Seeking and Development: Going with the Grain?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 677-682, November.
    20. Tom Broekel & Lars Mewes, 2017. "Analyzing the impact of R&D policy on regional diversification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1726, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2017.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.