IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ceo/wpaper/36.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proposition d'un cadre conceptuel pour la gestion du risque sanitaire des aliments dans les industries agroalimentaires

Author

Listed:
  • Doudja Saïdi-Kabèche
  • Marie-Hélène Vergote

Abstract

La maîtrise du risque sanitaire des aliments fait partie intégrante de la stratégie des firmes agro-alimentaires. Ces entreprises mettent en place des dispositifs organisationnels aptes à générer une maîtrise efficiente des risques, à travers la conformation à des référentiels assez stricts, répondant à des normes publiques ou à des standards privés. Ces dispositifs sont validés par des audits externes eux-mêmes préparés par des audits internes. Nous montrons, à travers l'analyse de l'état de l'art, les limites de ces double-dispositifs de contrôle. Nous nous proposons d'élaborer un cadre conceptuel original pour le déploiement d'une stratégie d'excellence en matière de sécurité alimentaire qui permettrait de renouveler l'audit interne. L'objectif est de sortir de la logique bureaucratique pour instaurer une relation auditeur/ audité favorisant l'apprentissage et le progrès continu. Ce cadre conceptuel est construit en mobilisant le formalisme de la méthode 5steps® qui s'intéresse particulièrement au pilotage des plans de progrès. - Abstract - Managing food safety risk is one of the main issues of food processing firms. The conformation to different specific standards (private or public) is one of the main levers used by these enterprises to respond to this strategic objective. Then, the use of internal and external audits is becoming pervasive in these organizations. We propose to use the 5Steps® method as a conceptual framework for the deployment of food safety strategy. We try to identify how to use this method to enhance internal audit practices by helping to change the auditing style from a conformance tool to a continuous improvement enabler.

Suggested Citation

  • Doudja Saïdi-Kabèche & Marie-Hélène Vergote, 2012. "Proposition d'un cadre conceptuel pour la gestion du risque sanitaire des aliments dans les industries agroalimentaires," INRA UMR CESAER Working Papers 2012/4, INRA UMR CESAER, Centre d'’Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'’Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux.
  • Handle: RePEc:ceo:wpaper:36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.dijon.inra.fr/cesaer/workingpapers/RePEc/ceo/wpaper/wp2012_4.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trienekens, Jacques & Zuurbier, Peter, 2008. "Quality and safety standards in the food industry, developments and challenges," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 107-122, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Ganjar Alfian & Muhammad Syafrudin & Jongtae Rhee, 2017. "Real-Time Monitoring System Using Smartphone-Based Sensors and NoSQL Database for Perishable Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Blind, Knut & Mangelsdorf, Axel & Pohlisch, Jakob, 2018. "The effects of cooperation in accreditation on international trade: Empirical evidence on ISO 9000 certifications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 50-59.
    4. Shashi & Rajwinder Singh & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2018. "Evaluating Partnerships in Sustainability-Oriented Food Supply Chain: A Five-Stage Performance Measurement Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2019. "The Effects of Non‐tariff Measures on Agri‐food Trade: A Review and Meta‐analysis of Empirical Evidence," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 595-617, September.
    6. Bailey, Alison P. & Garforth, Chris, 2014. "An industry viewpoint on the role of farm assurance in delivering food safety to the consumer: The case of the dairy sector of England and Wales," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 14-24.
    7. Yong Wang & Xudong Deng & Qian Lu & Mingke Guan & Fen Lu & Xiaochang Wu, 2023. "Developing Platform Supply Chain Contract Coordination and a Numerical Analysis Considering Fresh-Keeping Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Mahdi Ghodsi & Julia Grübler & Leon Podkaminer & Oliver Reiter, 2016. "Monthly Report No. 6/2016," wiiw Monthly Reports 2016-06, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    9. Jesús Hernández-Rubio & Juan C. Pérez-Mesa & Laura Piedra-Muñoz & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez, 2018. "Determinants of Food Safety Level in Fruit and Vegetable Wholesalers’ Supply Chain: Evidence from Spain and France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Rong, Aiying & Akkerman, Renzo & Grunow, Martin, 2011. "An optimization approach for managing fresh food quality throughout the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 421-429, May.
    11. JIANG, Qijun & FLORKOWSKI, Wojciech Jan, 2021. "Factors Limiting Quality Assurance Program Implementation In Food Manufacturing Companies In Shanghai, China," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 24(1), March.
    12. Wiegmann, Paul Moritz & de Vries, Henk J. & Blind, Knut, 2017. "Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1370-1386.
    13. Schreiner, Julia A., 2014. "Farmers’ Valuation of Incentives to Produce GMO-free Milk: A Discrete Choice Experiment," 2014 International European Forum, February 17-21, 2014, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 199373, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Guowei Liu & Jianxiong Zhang & Wansheng Tang, 2015. "Joint dynamic pricing and investment strategy for perishable foods with price-quality dependent demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 397-416, March.
    15. Raut, Rakesh D. & Gardas, Bhaskar B. & Narwane, Vaibhav S. & Narkhede, Balkrishna E., 2019. "Improvement in the food losses in fruits and vegetable supply chain - a perspective of cold third-party logistics approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    16. Z. Wang & H. J. van der Fels‐Klerx & A. G. J. M. Oude Lansink, 2020. "Optimization of Sampling for Monitoring Chemicals in the Food Supply Chain Using a Risk‐Based Approach: The Case of Aflatoxins and Dioxins in the Dutch Dairy Chain," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2539-2560, December.
    17. Thi Huong Tran, 2018. "Critical factors and enablers of food quality and safety compliance risk management in the Vietnamese seafood supply chain," Papers 1805.12109, arXiv.org.
    18. Daniel W. M. Chan & Matteo Cristofaro & Hala Nassereddine & Nicole S. N. Yiu & Hadi Sarvari, 2021. "Perceptions of Safety Climate in Construction Projects between Workers and Managers/Supervisors in the Developing Country of Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Mahdi Ghodsi, 2015. "The Role of Specific Trade Concerns Raised on TBTs in the Import of Products to the EU, USA and China," wiiw Working Papers 116, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    20. Haico te Kulve & Wouter Boon & Kornelia Konrad & Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker, 2018. "Influencing the direction of innovation processes: the shadow of authorities in demand articulation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 455-467.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sécurité alimentaire; Certification; Audit interne / Food safety; Certification; Internal audit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • D89 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Other
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ceo:wpaper:36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corinne DASEN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceinrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.