IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/24-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Grassroots Design Meets Grassroots Innovation: Rural Design Orientation and Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy R. Wojan
  • Stephan J. Goetz
  • Zheng Tian
  • Luyi Han

Abstract

The study of grassroots design�applying structured, creative processes to the usability or aesthetics of a product without input from professional design consultancies�remains under investigated. If design comprises a mediation between people and technology whereby technologies are made more accessible or more likely to delight, then the process by which new grassroots inventions are transformed into innovations valued in markets cannot be fully understood. This paper uses U.S. data on the design orientation of respondents in the 2014 Rural Establishment Innovation Survey linked to longitudinal data on the same firms to examine the association between design, innovation, and employment and payroll growth. Findings from the research will inform questions to be investigated in the recently collected 2022 Annual Business Survey (ABS) that for the first time contains a Design module.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy R. Wojan & Stephan J. Goetz & Zheng Tian & Luyi Han, 2024. "Grassroots Design Meets Grassroots Innovation: Rural Design Orientation and Firm Performance," Working Papers 24-17, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    • Handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:24-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2024/adrm/ces/CES-WP-24-17.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy R Wojan & Bonnie Nichols, 2018. "Design, innovation, and rural creative places: Are the arts the cherry on top, or the secret sauce?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Michael L. Anderson & Jeremy Magruder, 2017. "Split-Sample Strategies for Avoiding False Discoveries," NBER Working Papers 23544, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crown, Daniel & Faggian, Alessandra & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2020. "Foreign-Born graduates and innovation: Evidence from an Australian skilled visa program✰,✰✰,★,★★," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(9).
    2. Katherine Casey & Rachel Glennerster & Edward Miguel & Maarten Voors, 2023. "Skill Versus Voice in Local Development," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(2), pages 311-326, March.
    3. Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," Working Papers 2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    4. Zheng Tian & Timothy R. Wojan & Stephan J. Goetz, 2022. "An Examination of the Informational Value of Self-Reported Innovation Questions," Working Papers 22-46, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    5. Kashyap, Pratyoosh & Jablonski, Becca B.R. & Bauman, Allison, 2024. "Exploring the relationships among stocks of community wealth, state farm to school policies, and the intensity of farm to school activities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Goetz, Stephan J. & Han, Yicheol, 2020. "Latent innovation in local economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).
    7. Josephson, Anna & Michler, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Fehr, Dietmar & Kübler, Dorothea, 2022. "The Endowment Effect in the General Population," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 353, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    9. Alpino, Matteo & Hauge, Karen Evelyn & Kotsadam, Andreas & Markussen, Simen, 2022. "Effects of dialogue meetings on sickness absence—Evidence from a large field experiment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Edward Miguel, 2021. "Evidence on Research Transparency in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 193-214, Summer.
    11. Timothy R. Wojan, 2023. "Registered Report: Exploratory Analysis of Ownership Diversity and Innovation in the Annual Business Survey," Working Papers 23-11, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    12. Ron Berman & Christophe Van den Bulte, 2022. "False Discovery in A/B Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6762-6782, September.
    13. Haseeb, Muhammad & Vyborny, Kate, 2022. "Data, discretion and institutional capacity: Evidence from cash transfers in Pakistan," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    14. Lily Kiminami & Shinichi Furuzawa & Akira Kiminami, 2023. "Role of creative classes in sustainable agricultural development: focusing on creating shared value in rural Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 903-934, September.
    15. Kashyap, Pratyoosh & Jablonski, Becca B.R. & Bauman, Allison, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Stocks of Community Wealth and the Intensity of Farm to School Program Activities," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322167, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Sarah A. Janzen & Jeffrey D. Michler, 2021. "Ulysses' pact or Ulysses' raft: Using pre‐analysis plans in experimental and nonexperimental research," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1286-1304, December.
    17. Antonides, Gerrit & de Groot, I. Manon, 2022. "Mental budgeting of the self-employed without personnel," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Josh Siepel & Roberto Camerani & Monica Masucci, 2021. "Skills combinations and firm performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1425-1447, April.
    19. Ieva Zemite & Ilona Kunda & Ilze Judrupa, 2022. "The Role of the Cultural and Creative Industries in Sustainable Development of Small Cities in Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Tjernström, Emilia & Lybbert, Travis J. & Hernández, Rachel Frattarola & Correa, Juan Sebastian, 2021. "Learning by (virtually) doing: Experimentation and belief updating in smallholder agriculture," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 28-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; research methods; inclusive design; evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:24-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dawn Anderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.