IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdp/texdis/td602.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non nova, noviter?: Heinrich Dietzel and the last breath of classical political economy in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Coelho de Souza Almeida

    (Cedeplar-UFMG)

Abstract

In the Germany of the last quarter of the nineteenth-century, the dispute between the German Historical School of Economics and the newly founded Austrian school dominated economic discourse. In this environment, one author stood out in his criticism of both sides: Heinrich Dietzel. Dietzel proposed a theory and method, his Sozialökonomik (social economics), as a solution for the Methodenstreit. This reformulation, while correcting the mistakes of classical political economy, nonetheless followed what he saw the same direction, i.e. of a theoretical discipline with its object of study clearly delimited within the moral/social sciences. The intention was detaching from the latest developments (such as John Stuart Mill’s) as well as from what he saw as other erroneous criticism that, at the time, existed in German-speaking countries. This paper presents Dietzel’s work as relates to all these concerns and to the idea of social science as existed at the time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Coelho de Souza Almeida, 2019. "Non nova, noviter?: Heinrich Dietzel and the last breath of classical political economy in Germany," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 602, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/pesquisas/td/TD%20602.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tribe, Keith, 2015. "The Economy of the Word: Language, History, and Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190211615.
    2. Carl Menger, 2016. "The Social Theories of Classical Political Economy and Modern Economic Policy," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 13(3), pages 467–489-4, September.
    3. Bruce Caldwell, 2001. "There Really Was a German Historical School of Economics: A Comment on Heath Pearson," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 649-654, Fall.
    4. Moore, Gregory, 2003. "John Neville Keynes's Solution to the English Methodenstreit," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 5-38, March.
    5. H. K. Betz, 1988. "How does the German Historical School fit?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 409-430, Fall.
    6. Heath Pearson, 1999. "Was There Really a German Historical School of Economics?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 547-562, Fall.
    7. Jurgen G. Backhaus, 1993. "The University as an Economic Institution: The Political Economy of the Althoff System," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 20(4/5), pages 8-29, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonid Krasnozhon & Mykola Bunyk, 2018. "The role of the German Historical School in the development of Mises’s thought," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 343-357, September.
    2. Nils Goldschmidt, 2013. "Walter Eucken’s place in the history of ideas," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 127-147, June.
    3. Stefan Kolev, 2020. "The legacy of Max Weber and the early Austrians," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 33-54, March.
    4. Maxime Desmarais-Tremblay, 2017. "Paternalism and the public household. On the domestic origins of public economics," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17032, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Dieter Bögenhold, 2013. "Social Network Analysis and the Sociology of Economics: Filling a Blind Spot with the Idea of Social Embeddedness," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 293-318, April.
    6. Rae Dufty-Jones & Chris Gibson & Trevor Barnes, 2022. "Writing economies and economies of writing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 370-381, March.
    7. Horn, Karen, 2019. "The difficult relationship between historical ordoliberalism and Adam Smith," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 19/3, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    8. Spender, J. C., 2024. "Simon and Knight," MPRA Paper 120891, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Richard Ebeling, 2023. "Carl menger on economic policy: “Exact laws,” institutional prerequisites, and economic liberalism," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 331-355, June.
    10. Arne HEISE, 2016. "‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 81-101, November.
    11. Ben Huf, 2021. "Making Things Economic: Theory and Government in New South Wales, 1788–1863," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 117-125, March.
    12. Hans Siggaard Jensen, 2012. "The Changing Role of Knowledge in the Knowledge Economy: Concepts of Knowledge and Knowledge Management," Chapters, in: Knut Ingar Westeren (ed.), Foundations of the Knowledge Economy, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Maurício C. Coutinho & Carlos Eduardo Suprinyak, 2018. "Steuart, Smith, and the ‘system of commerce’: international trade and monetary theory in late-18th century british political economy," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 575, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    14. Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi, 2016. "History As A Way Of Doing Economics: Roberto Simonsen And The Diffusion Of The German Tradition Of Economic Thought In Brazil," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 007, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    15. Lee, Frederic, 2011. "The making of heterodox microeconomics," MPRA Paper 30907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Daniel Dufourt, 1993. "L'économie politique," Post-Print halshs-01273102, HAL.
    17. Martin, Christopher, 2021. "Adam Smith and the poor: A textual analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 837-849.
    18. Pattit, Jason M. & Pattit, Katherina G. & Spender, J C, 2021. "Edith T. Penrose: Economist of "The Ordinary Business of Life"," MPRA Paper 106375, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Madarász, Aladár, 2002. "Kameralizmus, történelmi iskola, osztrák gazdaságtan. Három vázlat a német és osztrák közgazdasági diskurzus történetéből [Cameralism, the historical school and Austrian economics. Three outlines f," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 838-857.
    20. Mark Pernecky & Thomas Richter, 2011. "Keynes’ Preface to the German Edition of the General Theory: Nazi Sympathies or Methodological Empathies?," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 40(2), pages 253-264, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Heinrich Dietzel; Sozialökonomik; Social Economics; Methodenstreit; Value Theory; History of Economic Thought; Wilhelm DiltheyClassification-JEL: O3;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdp:texdis:td602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gustavo Britto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.