IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt9fj2c4jw.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Freight Transportation Electronic Marketplaces: A Survey of the Industry and Exploration of Important Research Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Nandiraju, Srinivas
  • Regan, Amelia

Abstract

B2B e-Commerce facilitates the reduction of supply chain intermediaries and reduces transaction costs. This revolution has spawned a number of online marketplaces for freight transportation service procurement. The paper looks into the operational models of existing electronic freight marketplaces and the strategic behavior of shipper and carriers conducting their business in these market places. A literature survey of market clearing mechanisms models for online freight transportation market places is provided. Models for shipper-carrier strategic interaction are presented for freight transportation procurement. Some of the key research questions for developing methodologies to aid both the shippers and carriers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nandiraju, Srinivas & Regan, Amelia, 2008. "Freight Transportation Electronic Marketplaces: A Survey of the Industry and Exploration of Important Research Issues," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9fj2c4jw, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt9fj2c4jw
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9fj2c4jw.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John O. Ledyard & Mark Olson & David Porter & Joseph A. Swanson & David P. Torma, 2002. "The First Use of a Combined-Value Auction for Transportation Services," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 4-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael F. Gorman & John-Paul Clarke & René Koster & Michael Hewitt & Debjit Roy & Mei Zhang, 2023. "Emerging practices and research issues for big data analytics in freight transportation," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 28-60, March.
    2. Rancourt, Marie-Ève & Bellavance, François & Goentzel, Jarrod, 2014. "Market analysis and transportation procurement for food aid in Ethiopia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 198-219.
    3. Christoph Heinbach & Jan Beinke & Friedemann Kammler & Oliver Thomas, 2022. "Data-driven forwarding: a typology of digital platforms for road freight transport management," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 807-828, June.
    4. Anuradha Jain & Dirk Bruckmann & Rob E.C.M. van der Heijden & Vincent A.W.J. Marchau, 2019. "Towards rail-related multimodal freight exchange platforms: Exploring regulatory topics at EU level," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 20(2), pages 138-163, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2020. "Pushing frontiers in auction-based transport collaborations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. McKelvey, Bill & Wycisk, Christine & Hülsmann, Michael, 2009. "Designing an electronic auction market for complex 'smart parts' logistics: Options based on LeBaron's computational stock market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 476-494, August.
    3. Soumyakanti Chakraborty & Anup K. Sen & Amitava Bagchi, 2015. "Addressing the valuation problem in multi-round combinatorial auctions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1145-1160, October.
    4. Wedad Elmaghraby, 2005. "The Effect of Asymmetric Bidder Size on an Auction's Performance: Are More Bidders Always Better?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(12), pages 1763-1776, December.
    5. Anthony M. Kwasnica & John O. Ledyard & Dave Porter & Christine DeMartini, 2005. "A New and Improved Design for Multiobject Iterative Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 419-434, March.
    6. Kursad Derinkuyu & Fehmi Tanrisever & Nermin Kurt & Gokhan Ceyhan, 2020. "Optimizing Day-Ahead Electricity Market Prices: Increasing the Total Surplus for Energy Exchange Istanbul," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 700-716, July.
    7. Dellbrügge, Marius & Brilka, Tim & Kreuz, Felix & Clausen, Uwe, 2022. "Auction design in strategic freight procurement," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 295-325, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    8. Oktay Günlük & Lászlo Ladányi & Sven de Vries, 2005. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm and New Test Problems for Spectrum Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 391-406, March.
    9. Song, Jiongjiong & Regan, A C, 2003. "Approximation Algorithms for the Bid Construction Problem in Combinatorial Auctions for the Procurement of Freight Transportation Contracts," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3j7034z2, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Yossi Sheffi, 2004. "Combinatorial Auctions in the Procurement of Transportation Services," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 245-252, August.
    11. Richard Li-Yang Chen & Shervin AhmadBeygi & Amy Cohn & Damian R. Beil & Amitabh Sinha, 2009. "Solving Truckload Procurement Auctions Over an Exponential Number of Bundles," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 493-510, November.
    12. Song, Jiongjiong & Regan, Amelia, 2005. "Approximation algorithms for the bid construction problem in combinatorial auctions for the procurement of freight transportation contracts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 914-933, December.
    13. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2019. "Encroachment and canvassing strategy in a sea-cargo service chain with empty container repositioning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 175-186.
    14. Pickl, Matthias & Wirl, Franz, 2011. "Auction design for gas pipeline transportation capacity--The case of Nabucco and its open season," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 2143-2151, April.
    15. Hammami, Farouk & Rekik, Monia & Coelho, Leandro C., 2019. "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the bid construction problem in transportation procurement auctions with a heterogeneous fleet," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 150-177.
    16. Chang, Tsung-Sheng, 2009. "Decision support for truckload carriers in one-shot combinatorial auctions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 522-541, June.
    17. Ronald M. Harstad & Aleksandar Saša Pekeč, 2008. "Relevance to Practice and Auction Theory: A Memorial Essay for Michael Rothkopf," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 367-380, October.
    18. Larson, Nathan & Elmaghraby, Wedad, 2008. "Procurement auctions with avoidable fixed costs: an experimental approach," MPRA Paper 32163, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    19. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    20. Lindsey, Christopher & Mahmassani, Hani S., 2017. "Sourcing truckload capacity in the transportation spot market: A framework for third party providers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 261-273.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt9fj2c4jw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.