IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt6pv1x9xq.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Environmental Knowledge, Environmental Attitudes, and Vehicle Ownership and Use

Author

Listed:
  • Flamm, Bradley John

Abstract

Since the 1970s, significant majorities of Americans say they support protecting the natural environment, even if it involves some economic cost. Yet almost every year since the 1970s Americans have driven farther than the year before, owned more vehicles, used them for a larger percentage of all trips, and shared them with other passengers less often. Vehicles today are much cleaner and more fuel efficient than in the recent past, but many of the potential environmental benefits are offset by higher consumption. This dissertation explores this apparent contradiction by analyzing the relations between environmental knowledge, environmental attitudes, and vehicle ownership and use. The research relies on quantitative analysis of responses from 1,506 Sacramento, California area residents to a 37-question knowledge-attitudes-behavior survey (39.6% response rate). Hypotheses were tested concerning the bi-directional effects of environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes on each other and on number of household vehicles, fuel efficiency of household vehicles, estimated annual household miles driven, and estimated annual household fuel consumption. Difference of means analyses, multiple regression equations, and structuralequation modeling reveal that 1) respondents with pro-environmental attitudes know more about the environmental impacts of vehicle ownership and use, 2) the households of knowledgeable respondents own more fuel efficient vehicles and use less fuel, 3) the households of pro-environment respondents own fewer and more fuel efficient vehicles, drive them less, and consume less fuel, 4) vehicle ownership and use inversely affect environmental attitudes, but to a lesser extent than attitudes affect vehicle ownership and use, and 5) many respondents perceive constraints to making their vehicle ownership and use reflect their knowledge and attitudes. These findings suggest that public education and social marketing campaigns focusing on the majority of Americans with pro-environmental attitudes, combined with policies to reduce barriers to less resource-intensive vehicle ownership and use, could encourage greater demand for more fuel efficient vehicles and lower levels of vehicle ownership and miles driven. They also highlight the research importance of effective survey design, appropriate measurement of latent variables, and the inclusion of knowledge and attitudinal variables in some travel and environmental behavior studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Flamm, Bradley John, 2006. "Environmental Knowledge, Environmental Attitudes, and Vehicle Ownership and Use," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6pv1x9xq, University of California Transportation Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt6pv1x9xq
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6pv1x9xq.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Papaporn Chaihanchanchai & Saravudh Anantachart, 2023. "Encouraging green product purchase: Green value and environmental knowledge as moderators of attitude and behavior relationship," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 289-303, January.
    2. Alain Desdoigts & Fernando Jaramillo, 2017. "Learning by Doing, Inequality, and Sustained Growth: A Middle-class Perspective," EUSP Department of Economics Working Paper Series 2017/05, European University at St. Petersburg, Department of Economics.
    3. Tan, Chin-Seang & Ooi, Hooi-Yin & Goh, Yen-Nee, 2017. "A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 459-471.
    4. Park, Sungjin, 2008. "Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users’ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0ct7c30p, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Sanders, Rebecca L, 2013. "Examining the Cycle: How Perceived and Actual Bicycling Risk Influence Cylcing Frequency, Roadway Design Preferences, and Support for Cycling Among Bay Area Residents," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1tf5v738, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Sanders, Rebecca Lauren, 2013. "Examining the Cycle: How Perceived and Actual Bicycling Risk Influence Cycling Frequency, Roadway Design Preferences, and Support for Cycling Among Bay Area Residents," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6ct7x8hp, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Rafah A. Al–Jader & Dr. Ilham Sentosa, 2015. "A Conceptual Development on the Mediating Role of E-Service Recovery on the Relationship between Customer Determinants and Customer Retentions in the Airline Industry in Malaysia (A Structural Equatio," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 6(1), pages 98-103, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt6pv1x9xq. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.