IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt3sh9003x.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Traffic Congestion is Here to Stay....and Will Get Worse

Author

Listed:
  • Downs, Anthony

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Downs, Anthony, 2004. "Why Traffic Congestion is Here to Stay....and Will Get Worse," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3sh9003x, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt3sh9003x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3sh9003x.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anders Tønnesen & Oddrun Helen Hagen & Aud Tennøy, 2021. "Use of public information for road-capacity reductions: a study of mediating strategies during tunnel rehabilitations in Oslo," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2263-2286, October.
    2. Thomas Straatemeier, 2005. "Potential accessibility - an interesting conceptual framework to address strategic planning issues in the Amsterdam region?," ERSA conference papers ersa05p453, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Sharifi, Farinoush & Meitiv, Alexander & Shelton, Jeff & Xu, Xiaodan & Burris, Mark & Vallamsundar, Suriya & Xu, Yanzhi Ann, 2022. "Regional traffic operation and vehicle emission impact assessment of lane management policies," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Wei Yang & Wijnand Veeneman & Martin De Jong, 2018. "Transport Demand Management Policy Integration in Chinese Cities: A Proposed Analysis of Its Effects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Straatemeier, Thomas, 2008. "How to plan for regional accessibility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 127-137, March.
    6. Ted Balaker & Cecilia Joung Kim, 2006. "Do Economists Reach a Conclusion On Rail Transit?," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 3(3), pages 551-602, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt3sh9003x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.