IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt9ns859v6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development Of A Dynamic Equilibrium Assignment Procedure For Network-level Analysis Of New Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Sullivan, Edward C.
  • Wong, Sun

Abstract

Recognizing that many of the new technologies under consideration in the areas of automation, navigation, and control require a system-wide perspective to evaluate their full impacts, this investigation sought to identify a suitable network analysis procedure which would, with acceptable accuracy, quantify the traffic redistribution effects of deploying new technologies in actual urban settings. The specific focus of the work was to identify a network traffic assignment procedure to be used in the analysis and evaluation of new technologies deployed in selected corridors containing High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV) facilities; however, the results are equally applicable to the assessment of new technologies in any congested urban network.

Suggested Citation

  • Sullivan, Edward C. & Wong, Sun, 1989. "Development Of A Dynamic Equilibrium Assignment Procedure For Network-level Analysis Of New Technology," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9ns859v6, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt9ns859v6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9ns859v6.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. LeBlanc, Larry J. & Abdulaal, Mustafa, 1984. "A comparison of user-optimum versus system-optimum traffic assignment in transportation network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 115-121, April.
    2. Patrice Marcotte & Jacques Guélat, 1988. "Adaptation of a Modified Newton Method for Solving the Asymmetric Traffic Equilibrium Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 112-124, May.
    3. Smith, M. J., 1984. "Two alternative definitions of traffic equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 63-65, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Arnott, 1992. "Information and Usage of Congestible Facilities Under Free Access," Discussion Papers 974, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    2. Hall, Randolph W., 1991. "Time Benefits of New Transportation Technologies: The Case of Highway Automation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7g65723v, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iryo, Takamasa & Watling, David, 2019. "Properties of equilibria in transport problems with complex interactions between users," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 87-114.
    2. Zhang, Ding & Nagurney, Anna & Wu, Jiahao, 2001. "On the equivalence between stationary link flow patterns and traffic network equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 731-748, September.
    3. repec:wsi:jeapmx:v:20:y:2018:i:04:n:s0219198918500068 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dulce Rosas & Jordi Castro & Lídia Montero, 2009. "Using ACCPM in a simplicial decomposition algorithm for the traffic assignment problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 289-313, November.
    5. Louis de Grange & Juan Carlos Muñoz, 2007. "An equivalent optimization formulation for the traffic assignment problem with asymmetric linear costs," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Iryo, Takamasa & Smith, Michael J. & Watling, David, 2020. "Stabilisation strategy for unstable transport systems under general evolutionary dynamics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 136-151.
    7. García, Ricardo & Marín, Angel, 2005. "Network equilibrium with combined modes: models and solution algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 223-254, March.
    8. Y. Ge & B. Sun & H. Zhang & W. Szeto & Xizhao Zhou, 2015. "A Comparison of Dynamic User Optimal States with Zero, Fixed and Variable Tolerances," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 583-598, September.
    9. Meneguzzer, Claudio, 1995. "An equilibrium route choice model with explicit treatment of the effect of intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 329-356, October.
    10. Watling, David, 1998. "Perturbation stability of the asymmetric stochastic equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 155-171, April.
    11. D E Boyce, 1986. "Integration of Supply and Demand Models in Transportation and Location: Problem Formulations and Research Questions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 18(4), pages 485-489, April.
    12. Watling, David, 1996. "Asymmetric problems and stochastic process models of traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 339-357, October.
    13. Wen-Long Jin, 2015. "Advances in Dynamic Traffic Assgmnt: TAC," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 617-634, September.
    14. Robin Lindsey, 2004. "Existence, Uniqueness, and Trip Cost Function Properties of User Equilibrium in the Bottleneck Model with Multiple User Classes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 293-314, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt9ns859v6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.