IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt87x2j1n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Traffic Assignment For Automated Highway Systems: A Two-lane Highway With Speed Constancy

Author

Listed:
  • Tsao, H. S. Jacob

Abstract

Dynamic traffic assignment through analytical modeling and optimization has been widely accepted by the IVHS R&D community as a promising traffic control tool for understanding and relieving traffic congestion on conventional highways and city streets. Due to the completely controlled nature of AHS traffic, dynamic assignment of AHS traffic is even more promising. One added dimension of complexity associated with AHS dynamic traffic assignment is lane assignment. Lane changes, for fully utilizing AHS capacity or for exiting, incur disturbances to and hence reduction of longitudinal flow. Intelligent lane assignment is necessary to ensure a high rate of successful exiting, to another highway or to city streets, while minimizing the disturbances to the longitudinal flow. Merging maneuvers occurring at merge points such as on-ramps, highway-to-highway interchanges and locations where one lane is being dropped may also introduce disturbances to the longitudinal traffic flow on AHS. Intelligent metering and flow control at on-ramps and other merge locations is necessary to maximize the capacity while balancing the need to serve local demands with the need to optimize system throughput. This paper identifies a general class of equations/inequalities to represent the impact of lane changes and merges on AHS longitudinal flow and develop mathematical models for system-optimal dynamic traffic assignment on a two-lane (one direction) automated highway. The amount of impedance to the longitudinal flow depends on the operating scenario and traffic conditions and can be highly stochastic. This paper focuses on deterministic impedance. This is a necessary step towards a complete study of stochastic impedance and the experience gained with the proposed focus is indispensable for studying the stochastic impedance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsao, H. S. Jacob, 1996. "Dynamic Traffic Assignment For Automated Highway Systems: A Two-lane Highway With Speed Constancy," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt87x2j1n8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt87x2j1n8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/87x2j1n8.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Ran & David E. Boyce & Larry J. LeBlanc, 1993. "A New Class of Instantaneous Dynamic User-Optimal Traffic Assignment Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 192-202, February.
    2. Randolph W. Hall, 1995. "Longitudinal and Lateral Throughput on an Idealized Highway," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 118-127, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hall, Randolph W. & Caliskan, Cenk, 1997. "Design And Evaluation Of An Automated Highway System With Optimized Lane Assignment," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6c85n2p5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moore, II, James E. & Kim, Geunyoung & Cho, Seongdil & Hu, Hsi-hwa & Xu, Rong, 1997. "Evaluating System ATMIS Technologies Via Rapid Estimation Of Network Flows: Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5c70f3d9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    3. Ran, Bin & Hall, Randolph & Boyce, David E., 1995. "A Link-Based Variational Inequality Model for Dynamic Departure Time/Route Choice," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt84t190b3, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Y. Ge & B. Sun & H. Zhang & W. Szeto & Xizhao Zhou, 2015. "A Comparison of Dynamic User Optimal States with Zero, Fixed and Variable Tolerances," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 583-598, September.
    5. Xinhua Mao & Jianwei Wang & Changwei Yuan & Wei Yu & Jiahua Gan, 2018. "A Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model for the Sustainability of Pavement Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Hall, Randolph & Lotspeich, David, 1996. "Optimized Lane Assignment on an Automated Highway," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4jz9s97d, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Paipuri, Mahendra & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2020. "Bi-modal macroscopic traffic dynamics in a single region," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 257-290.
    9. Huang, Hai-Jun & Lam, William H. K., 2002. "Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 253-273, March.
    10. Y. W. Xu & J. H. Wu & M. Florian & P. Marcotte & D. L. Zhu, 1999. "Advances in the Continuous Dynamic Network Loading Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 341-353, November.
    11. Guo, Qiangqiang & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2020. "Macroscopic fundamental diagram based perimeter control considering dynamic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 87-109.
    12. Babak Javani & Abbas Babazadeh, 2020. "Path-Based Dynamic User Equilibrium Model with Applications to Strategic Transportation Planning," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 329-366, June.
    13. N. Nezamuddin & Stephen Boyles, 2015. "A Continuous DUE Algorithm Using the Link Transmission Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 465-483, September.
    14. Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang & Ziyou Gao & W. Y. Szeto, 2013. "An Intersection-Movement-Based Dynamic User Optimal Route Choice Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1134-1147, October.
    15. Godbole, Datta N. & Lygeros, John, 2000. "Safety and Throughput Analysis of Automated Highway Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6767x8n2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. Tong, C. O. & Wong, S. C., 2000. "A predictive dynamic traffic assignment model in congested capacity-constrained road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 625-644, November.
    17. Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Trade-off between safety, mobility and stability in automated vehicle following control: An analytical method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-18.
    18. Bana, Soheila Vahdati, 2001. "Coordinating Automated Vehicles via Communication," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1ks2m1f4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    19. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2006. "A composite traffic flow modeling approach for incident-responsive network traffic assignment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 461-478.
    20. Han, Lanshan & Ukkusuri, Satish & Doan, Kien, 2011. "Complementarity formulations for the cell transmission model based dynamic user equilibrium with departure time choice, elastic demand and user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1749-1767.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt87x2j1n8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.