IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt8qx869jg.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Transit-Based Smart Parking: Early Field Test Results

Author

Listed:
  • Rodier, Caroline J.
  • Shaheen, Susan

Abstract

Smart parking management technologies may provide a cost-effective tool to address near-term parking constraints at transit stations. Smart parking management systems have been implemented in numerous European, British, and Japanese cities to more efficiently use parking capacity at transit stations by providing real-time information via variable message signs to motorists about available parking spaces in park-and-ride lots. This paper describes the results of initial focus groups and surveys of participants in a smart parking field operational test, which was launched at a San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District station in Oakland, California on December 8, 2004. Insights into the project's travel effects are gained from an analysis of participant travel behavior before they started using the service. The results indicate that the project is attracting new (14 percent) and infrequent BART commuters (25 percent). While some participants may drive further (two miles on average) to access the Rockridge BART station, where the field test is based, the magnitude of this increase is unlikely to off-set total auto travel reductions (an average of 18 miles) due to shifts from auto to BART for commute trips. Thus, it appears that the smart parking project is getting cars off the road during peak periods and onto transit.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan, 2005. "Transit-Based Smart Parking: Early Field Test Results," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8qx869jg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8qx869jg
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8qx869jg.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merriman, David, 1998. "How many parking spaces does it take to create one additional transit passenger?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 565-584, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Applying Integrated ITS Technologies to Parking Management Systems: A Transit-Based Case Study in the San Francisco Bay Area," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4806754k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Deka, Devajyoti, 2012. "The impacts of non-resident parking restrictions at commuter rail stations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 451-461.
    3. Rodier, Caroline J. PhD & Shaheen, Susan A. PhD & Kemmerer, Charlene, 2008. "Smart Parking Management Field Test: A Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Parking Demonstration; Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3w33t61b, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Rodier, Caroline & Shaheen, Susan A. & Blake, Tagan, 2010. "Smart Parking Pilot on the Coaster Commuter Rail Line in San Diego, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt06s723rw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Shaheen, Susan A. PhD & Rodier, Caroline PhD, 2006. "Smart Parking Management Field Test: A Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Parking Demonstration," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1f16q0wp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Rodier, Caroline J & Shaheen, Susan A, 2010. "Transit-based smart parking: An evaluation of the San Francisco Bay area field test," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6c6613ks, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Shaheen, Susan A & Kemmerer, Charlene, 2008. "Smart Parking Linked to Transit: Lessons Learned from Field Test in San Francisco Bay Area of California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3wh3r99g, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Krishnamurthy, Chandra Kiran B. & Ngo, Nicole S., 2020. "The effects of smart-parking on transit and traffic: Evidence from SFpark," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan, 2006. "Transit-Based Smart Parking in the U.S.: Behavioral Analysis of San Francisco Bay Area Field Test," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt60j0r6m5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Christopher F. Dumas & John C. Whitehead & James H. Herstine & Robert B. Buerger & Jeffery M. Hill, 2006. "Estimating Peak Demand for Beach Parking Spaces," Working Papers 06-05, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    11. Mingardo, Giuliano, 2013. "Transport and environmental effects of rail-based Park and Ride: evidence from the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 7-16.
    12. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    13. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan A. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Applying Integrated ITS Technologies to Parking Management Systems: A Transit-Based Case Study in the San Francisco Bay Area," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5128r10g, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Clayton, William & Ben-Elia, Eran & Parkhurst, Graham & Ricci, Miriam, 2014. "Where to park? A behavioural comparison of bus Park and Ride and city centre car park usage in Bath, UK," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 124-133.
    15. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan A. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Transit-Based Smart Parking in the San Francisco Bay Area: an Assessment of User Demand and Behavioral Effects," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5k15z9gp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. Watters, Paul & O'Mahony, Margaret & Caulfield, Brian, 2006. "Response to cash outs for work place parking and work place parking charges," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 503-510, November.
    17. Grisé, Emily & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2018. "Where is the happy transit rider? Evaluating satisfaction with regional rail service using a spatial segmentation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 84-96.
    18. Baum-Snow, Nathaniel & Kahn, Matthew E., 2000. "The effects of new public projects to expand urban rail transit," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 241-263, August.
    19. Rodier, Caroline J & Shaheen, Susan A & Eaken, Amanda M, 2005. "Transit-Based Smart Parking in the San Francisco Bay Area, California: Assessment of User Demand and Behavioral Effects," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3kw2x3x8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; UCD-ITS-RR-05-15;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8qx869jg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.