IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt8k31f512.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UCPRC Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Initial Case Studies for Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions for Pavement Preservation Treatments with Different Rolling Resistance

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, T.
  • Lee, I. S.
  • Harvey, J.
  • Kendall, A.
  • Lee, E. B.
  • Kim, C.

Abstract

This report describes a pavement life cycle assessment (LCA) model developed to initially evaluate total energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pavement maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) strategies. This LCA model allows analysis of the energy consumption and GHG emissions associated with material production, construction, and vehicle operation during pavement use, which includes the effects of pavement roughness and texture on vehicle operation; at this time the model does not include the effects of pavement deflection. Other types of treatments and the materials used for them, as well as other effects of the pavement on the environment in the pavement Use Phase will be considered in future studies. The model was used to evaluate four case studies of Caltrans pavement preservation treatments for both asphalt and concrete surfaces with different roughness and texture and traffic levels. The case studies were performed to provide a preliminary indication of the net effect of changing the roughness and texture on the analysis period performance of pavements, not to compare asphalt and concrete pavements. At this time, asphalt and concrete pavements cannot be directly compared because submodels are not yet included in the LCA model for factors in the Use Phase other than roughness and texture. For this reason, it was assumed that the pavement preservation treatments would not change the pavement structure type (asphalt or concrete). Energy and GHG-emissions savings from pavement preservation treatments with CAPM treatments as an example (CPR B involving diamond grinding with 3 percent slab replacements for concrete and pavement preservation overlays for asphalt, performed using nighttime closures) were then compared with an alternative strategy where no treatment occurs, except for routine maintenance of damaged pavement. A preliminary indication of the sensitivity of the case study results to the level of smoothness achieved during pavement preservation construction was evaluated. A preliminary indication of the sensitivity of the net effect on GHG emissions and energy use to the level of traffic in the Use Phase was also evaluated by inclusion of a high and a low traffic case study for both concrete and asphalt pavements. The potential benefits of the treatments are also compared with energy and emissions savings from projected improvements in vehicle fleet fuel economy and reductions of vehicle miles traveled, which are strategies adopted by the California Air Resources Board for reducing GHG emissions. For highways with high traffic volumes, results of the case studies show that the energy and GHG savings accrued during the Use Phase (due to reduced roughness and macrotexture change) can be significantly larger than the energy use and GHG emissions from material production and construction. The extent of the benefit was dependent on constructed smoothness with a much smaller benefit from change of texture. These savings can be larger than those from other strategies meant to reduce highway transportation energy use and emissions for a given route, such as projected improvements in fleet average vehicle fuel economy within the period analyzed for the project location, depending on the amount of traffic using the pavement. For low traffic volume highways, the smoothness obtained by the contractor and the materials used determine whether the net effect on GHG emissions and energy use is positive or negative, and may result in a net increase in energy use and GHG emissions if low traffic volumes and poor construction quality (rough pavement produced by construction) occur together. These initial case studies only represent example sections, and application of the LCA model to the network remains to be done. The materials datasets for the case studies used data from several sources outside California that were adjusted to California electrical energy supplies. Sensitivity analysis with the different data sets did not change the conclusions. All materials mix designs (taken from meetings with industry) and construction were representative examples. The method used to combine pavement characteristics (IRI and texture) and emissions models has not been validated, although the fuel economy models have been validated by Michigan State University. This report was reviewed by concrete and asphalt industry experts through their respective California industry organizations, and errors and omissions in the original draft have been addressed based on those comments, which are gratefully acknowledged.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, T. & Lee, I. S. & Harvey, J. & Kendall, A. & Lee, E. B. & Kim, C., 2012. "UCPRC Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Initial Case Studies for Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions for Pavement Preservation Treatments with Different Rolling Resistance," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8k31f512, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8k31f512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8k31f512.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lutsey, Nicholas P., 2008. "Prioritizing Climate Change Mitigation Alternatives: Comparing Transportation Technologies to Options in Other Sectors," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5rd41433, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lea, Jon & Harvey, John & Saboori, Arash & Butt, Ali A., 2022. "eLCAP: A Web Application for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Pavements," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9f5181j1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Jun Xie & Zhihu Wang & Fusong Wang & Shaopeng Wu & Zongwu Chen & Chao Yang, 2021. "The Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Emissions of Asphalt Pavement Incorporating Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag by Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Lea, Jon & Harvey, John & Saboori, Arash & Butt, Ali Azhar, 2022. "eLCAP: A Web Application for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Pavements," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0b9635gm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasanbeigi, Ali & Morrow, William & Sathaye, Jayant & Masanet, Eric & Xu, Tengfang, 2013. "A bottom-up model to estimate the energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 315-325.
    2. Wang, T. & Harvey, J. & Kendall, A., 2013. "Network-Level Life-Cycle Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas from CAPM Treatments," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt87q8x6j2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Kok, Robert & Annema, Jan Anne & van Wee, Bert, 2011. "Cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation in transport: A review of methodological approaches and their impact," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7776-7793.
    4. Harvey, John & Butt, Ali A. & Saboori, Arash & Lozano, Mark & Kim, Changmo & Kendall, Alissa, 2019. "White Paper on Alternate Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Life Cycle Approach Using a Supply Curve," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7208x78q, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Hasanbeigi, Ali & Morrow, William & Masanet, Eric & Sathaye, Jayant & Xu, Tengfang, 2013. "Energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction opportunities in the cement industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 287-297.
    6. John T. Harvey & Ali A. Butt & Mark T. Lozano & Alissa Kendall & Arash Saboori & Jeremy D. Lea & Changmo Kim & Imad Basheer, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment for Transportation Infrastructure Policy Evaluation and Procurement for State and Local Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-36, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8k31f512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.