IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt8bs198sz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

American Micromobility Panel: Part 1

Author

Listed:
  • Fitch-Polse, Dillon T
  • Mohiuddin, Hossain
  • Fukushige, Tatsuya
  • Darr, Justin
  • Agarwal, Swati

Abstract

This report presents preliminary findings from the American Micromobility Panel, the largest study of shared micromobility services in the United States incorporating riders from multiple major operators. Micromobility services (bike-share and scooter-share) have recently emerged in many U.S. cities. Given that the substitution of bicycling, scooting, and other small vehicle travel for car travel will help cities reach numerous planning goals (e.g., accessibility, emissions, climate, health, equity, etc.), there is a need for understanding the effects of these mobility services. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of micromobility services on travel behavior and outcomes such as mode shift, car ownership, access, equity, safety, and physical activity. The authors surveyed shared micromobility service users in 48 U.S. cities with two different surveys in Summer 2022: a 21-day smartphone-based travel diary (2206 participants with 183,483 trips), and an online follow-up survey of travel diary participants (657 valid responses). Car substitution rates, including private car and ride-hailing, show strong variation by city size and micromobility vehicle type. Through self-report, micromobility seems to have had at least a partial influence on the decision to purchase a car, perhaps as a part of a long-term car use reduction effort/plan. Participants showed positive attitudes toward using public transit, but a small portion of trips to access or egress from transit facilities were made by the participants. Instead, the participants more generally showed a transit substitution effect when using micromobility services. Results also suggest that bike-share and scooter-share use may be influenced in opposing ways by participant income. Half of participants had at least once experienced that they could not find an available vehicle nearby, suggesting a sizeable supply constraint on demand for the services to satisfy existing micromobility user needs. The effect of micromobility services on increasing physical activity was slight given the physical activity it often replaced. Additionally, concerning safety, participants tended to agree that bike-share is safer than scooter-share, and participants tended to agree with the view that using micromobility improved their mental health. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Fitch-Polse, Dillon T & Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fukushige, Tatsuya & Darr, Justin & Agarwal, Swati, 2023. "American Micromobility Panel: Part 1," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8bs198sz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8bs198sz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8bs198sz.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hossain Mohiuddin, 2021. "Planning for the First and Last Mile: A Review of Practices at Selected Transit Agencies in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Fitch, Dillon PhD & Mohiuddin, Hossain & Handy, Susan PhD, 2020. "Investigating the Influence of Dockless Electric Bike-share on Travel Behavior, Attitudes, Health, and Equity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2x53m37z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fukushige, Tatsuya & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T., 2024. "American Micromobility Panel (Part 2): Transit Connection, Mode Substitution, and VMT Reduction," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4qr5t2tw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. & Handy, Susan L., 2024. "Examining market segmentation to increase bike-share use and enhance equity: The case of the greater Sacramento region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 279-290.
    2. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. & Handy, Susan L., 2023. "Does bike-share enhance transport equity? Evidence from the Sacramento, California region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Hossain Mohiuddin & Md Musfiqur Rahman Bhuiya & Shaila Jamal & Zhi Chen, 2022. "Exploring the Choice of Bicycling and Walking in Rajshahi, Bangladesh: An Application of Integrated Choice and Latent Variable (ICLV) Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch, Dillon & Handy, Susan, 2022. "Examining Market Segmentation to Increase Bike-Share Use: The Case of the Greater Sacramento Region," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt71h6g0td, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Yu Du & Xian Ji & Chenxi Dou & Rui Wang, 2024. "Boosting Winter Green Travel: Prioritizing Built Environment Enhancements for Shared Bike Users Accessing Public Transit in the First/Last Mile Using Machine Learning and Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Fanchao Liao & Jaap Vleugel & Gustav Bosehans & Dilum Dissanayake & Neil Thorpe & Margaret Bell & Bart van Arem & Gonc{c}alo Homem de Almeida Correia, 2023. "Mode substitution induced by electric mobility hubs: results from Amsterdam," Papers 2310.19036, arXiv.org.
    7. Rui Yao & Kenan Zhang, 2023. "How would mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) platform survive as an intermediary? From the viewpoint of stability in many-to-many matching," Papers 2310.08285, arXiv.org.
    8. Chrysa Vizmpa & George Botzoris & Panagiotis Lemonakis & Athanasios Galanis, 2023. "Micromobility in Urban Trail Paths: Expanding and Strengthening the Planning of 15-Minute Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Fukushige, Tatsuya & Fitch, Dillon T. & Handy, Susan, 2022. "Can an Incentive-Based approach to rebalancing a Dock-less Bike-share system Work? Evidence from Sacramento, California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 181-194.
    10. Olga Tzanni & Paraskevas Nikolaou & Stella Giannakopoulou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    11. Hossain Mohiuddin, 2021. "Planning for the First and Last Mile: A Review of Practices at Selected Transit Agencies in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Fukushige, Tatsuya & Fitch, Dillon PhD & Handy, Susan, 2021. "How Dock-less Electric Bike Share Influences Travel Behavior, Attitudes, Health, and Equity: Phase II," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0x373679, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    13. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. PhD, 2024. "Is Micromobility Being Used in Place of Car Trips in Daily Travel (or “Trip Chains”)?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2r66k788, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Dillon T. Fitch & Hossain Mohiuddin & Susan L. Handy, 2021. "Examining the Effects of the Sacramento Dockless E-Bike Share on Bicycling and Driving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Bhuiya, Md Musfiqur Rahman & Hasan, Md Musleh Uddin & Jamme, Huê-Tâm, 2024. "How individual perceptions of transportation systems influence mode choice for mobility-challenged people: A case study in Dhaka using an integrated choice and latent variable model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 259-270.
    16. Nur Oktaviani Widiastuti & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan, 2024. "Ride-Hailing Preferences for First- and Last-Mile Connectivity at Intercity Transit Hubs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Bhuiya, Md Musfiqur Rahman & Hasan, Md Musleh Uddin & Mohiuddin, Hossain & Anni, Afrin Hossain & Chen, Zhi & Jones, Steven, 2024. "Inequalities within mobility inequalities: A case study of mode specific problems faced by movement challenged persons of Dhaka, Bangladesh," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. Valeska V. Geldres-Weiss & Nathaniel P. Massa & Joaquín Monreal-Pérez, 2021. "Export Promotion Agencies’ Lived Turmoil, Response and Strategies in COVID-19 Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    19. Bretones, Alexandra & Marquet, Oriol, 2022. "Sociopsychological factors associated with the adoption and usage of electric micromobility. A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 230-249.
    20. Wei Li & Chanam Lee & Samuel D. Towne & Sinan Zhong & Jiahe Bian & Hanwool Lee & Sungmin Lee & Xuemei Zhu & Youngre Noh & Yang Song & Marcia G. Ory, 2024. "Building Sustainable and Connected Communities by Addressing Public Transportation’s First-Mile Problem: Insights from a Stated Preference Survey in El Paso, Texas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences; Bicycles; Micromobility; Scooters; Shared mobility; Surveys; Travel behavior;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt8bs198sz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.