IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt6j66v8kc.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Universal Basic Mobility Pilot Programs in Oakland and Bakersfield, California

Author

Listed:
  • Sanguinetti, Angela PhD
  • Alston-Stepnitz, Eli
  • Nelson, Leslie
  • Searl, Emily
  • DePew, Ashley

Abstract

Pilot programs in California and beyond are exploring universal basic mobility (UBM), which calls upon government actors to ensure that everyone can access transportation services for basic needs. UBM addresses the problem of transport poverty, which is defined in various ways but is generally when transportation spending puts one below the poverty line or transportation is exceedingly time-consuming, unsafe, or unavailable. This research evaluated UBM-inspired pilot programs in Oakland and Bakersfield, via pre- and post-pilot surveys and interviews during the programs. Both pilots provided free-fare transportation services (shared micromobility in both cities and public transit services in Oakland) to populations vulnerable to transport poverty (residents of a low-income, minority-majority community in East Oakland and current and former foster youth in Bakersfield). Participants replaced car trips and/or walking with shared mobility and/or public transportation and reported improved access to jobs, food, health care, and social and recreational opportunities. They were able to go more places, more efficiently, and perhaps even enjoy the trip. The services helped participants carry out activities with more comfort and dignity and yielded social and cultural benefits. Lessons learned for program design and administration include the need for: providing some car-based services; clear communications throughout the program; training/support components for new mobility options; troubleshooting operations; and planning for turnover in program staff and fast changes in micromobility services.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanguinetti, Angela PhD & Alston-Stepnitz, Eli & Nelson, Leslie & Searl, Emily & DePew, Ashley, 2024. "Evaluating Universal Basic Mobility Pilot Programs in Oakland and Bakersfield, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6j66v8kc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6j66v8kc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6j66v8kc.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bull, Owen & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Silva, Hugo E., 2021. "The impact of fare-free public transport on travel behavior: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Brough, Rebecca & Freedman, Matthew & Phillips, David C., 2022. "Experimental evidence on the effects of means-tested public transportation subsidies on travel behavior," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Cervero, Robert & Deakin, Elizabeth, 2008. "The Challenge of Urban Transportation in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3gt1r30m, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stéphanie Truchet-Aznar & Chloé Duvivier & Jacques Veslot, 2024. "Assessing the impact of fare-free public transport on ridership. The case of Clermont Auvergne Metropole [Évaluation de l’impact de la gratuité des transports en commun sur leur fréquentation. Appl," Post-Print hal-04747019, HAL.
    2. Brough, Rebecca & Freedman, Matthew & Ho, Daniel E. & Phillips, David C., 2022. "Can transportation subsidies reduce failures to appear in criminal court? Evidence from a pilot randomized controlled trial," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Klotz, Phil-Adrian & Daniel, Theresa & Gail, Maximilian Maurice, 2024. "The Impact of Public Transport Subsidies on Highway Traffic: Evidence from Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302401, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Shi, Linchang & Yang, Jiayu & Lee, Jaeyoung Jay & Bai, Jun & Ryu, Ingon & Choi, Keechoo, 2024. "Spatial-temporal identification of commuters using trip chain data from non-motorized mode incentive program and public transportation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Rozynek, Caroline, 2024. "Imagine the financial barrier to public transport use disappears. The impact of the 9-Euro-Ticket on the mobility and social participation of low-income households with children," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 80-90.
    6. Fielbaum, Andres, 2024. "On the relationship between free public transport, stop spacing, and optimal frequencies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Basnak, Paul & Giesen, Ricardo, 2023. "Assessing free-fare public transport in Chilean cities through optimization models," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Riggs, William, 2015. "Testing personalized outreach as an effective TDM measure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 178-186.
    9. Guzman, Luis A. & Hessel, Philipp, 2022. "The effects of public transport subsidies for lower-income users on public transport use: A quasi-experimental study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 215-224.
    10. Pogonyi, Csaba G. & Graham, Daniel J. & Carbo, Jose M., 2021. "Metros, agglomeration and displacement. Evidence from London," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Brough, Rebecca & Freedman, Matthew & Phillips, David C., 2022. "Experimental evidence on the effects of means-tested public transportation subsidies on travel behavior," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Allister Loder & Fabienne Cantner & Lennart Adenaw & Nico Nachtigall & David Ziegler & Felix Gotzler & Markus B. Siewert & Stefan Wurster & Sebastian Goerg & Markus Lienkamp & Klaus Bogenberger, 2023. "Germany's nationwide travel experiment in 2022: public transport for 9 Euro per month -- First findings of an empirical study," Papers 2306.08297, arXiv.org.
    13. Congleton, Christopher, 2009. "Results of the Fall 2007 UC Davis Campus Travel Assessment," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2547k6pt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Danijel Hojski & David Hazemali & Marjan Lep, 2022. "The Analysis of the Effects of a Fare Free Public Transport Travel Demand Based on E-Ticketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Ramírez, Vicente & Galilea, Patricia & Poblete, Joaquín & Silva, Hugo E., 2022. "Team-based incentives in transportation firms: An experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt6j66v8kc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.