IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt4w92s6nj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EasyConnect: Low-Speed Modes Linked to Transit Planning Project

Author

Listed:
  • Shaheen, Susan
  • Rodier, Caroline J.

Abstract

Ninth publication for ITS-Davis web site Access from public transit stations to employment and home locations can be a significant barrier to public transportation use in many urban regions, which is also commonly known as the "first and last mile" problem. The EasyConnect field test operated from August 2005 to December 2006 to introduce shared-use electric bicycles, non-motorized bicycles, and SegwayÆ Human Transporters (HTs) to employment centers in and around the Pleasant Hill BART District stations. EasyConnect linked 36 employees of 14 companies at the Contra Costa Centre and Fresenius Medical. Contra Costa Centre took over the management of the EasyConnect program, which is now called "Green Fleet" and is operating an expanded and upgraded fleet of Segway HTs, electric bicycles, and bikes. Although the EasyConnect program was initially designed to bridge the barriers to access from public transit stations to employment locations, the results of the field test indicated higher participation demand by Day Users (e.g., lunch, business meetings, errands) rather than by commuters. This may have been a function of the institutional support available for the program in the area. The Contra Costa Centre, which is walking distance from the Pleasant Hill BART station, was able to provide significantly more support to the program relative to employers and business centers further away from the station. The availability of the low-speed modes for Day Use at the Contra Costa Centre, however, may have allowed for a higher level of public transit use and carpool commuting. Even without accounting for such mode shifts, the evaluation results indicate net benefits for both commute and Day Use program participants from reduced vehicle travel and increased physical activity. In the future, shared-use low speed mode programs, like EasyConnect, should continue to examine pedestrian concerns about the use of these modes on trails and sidewalks.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J., 2008. "EasyConnect: Low-Speed Modes Linked to Transit Planning Project," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4w92s6nj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4w92s6nj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4w92s6nj.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan & Novick, Linda, 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) district Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and other Low Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6x0767zk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan A. & Novick, Linda, 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and Other Low Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7486s65s, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and Other Low-Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0z09g3kg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Efthymiou, Dimitrios & Antoniou, Constantinos & Waddell, Paul, 2013. "Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 64-73.
    2. Jingyao Zhao & Fan Zhang & Lei Gao & Chunhai Han & Xiongxiong Chen, 2024. "Revealing Daily Mobility Pattern Disparities of Monomodal and Multimodal Travelers through a Multi-Layer Cluster Analysis: Insights from a Combined Big Dataset," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Barbara B. Brown & Wyatt A. Jensen & Doug Tharp, 2019. "Residents’ expectations for new rail stops: optimistic neighborhood perceptions relate to subsequent transit ridership," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 125-146, February.
    4. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nair, Rahul & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Equilibrium network design of shared-vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 47-61.
    2. Rodier, Caroline J. & Shaheen, Susan, 2008. "Low-Speed Modes Linked to Public Transit Field Test Results," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6dv0v3qg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Rahul Nair & Elise Miller-Hooks, 2016. "Equilibrium design of bicycle sharing systems: the case of Washington D.C," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(3), pages 321-344, August.
    4. Rahul Nair & Elise Miller-Hooks, 2011. "Fleet Management for Vehicle Sharing Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 524-540, November.
    5. Todd, Michael, 2006. "Enhanced Transit Strategies: Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priority and ITS Technology Architectures for TOD Enhancement," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8h1969p9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline & Eaken, Amanda, 2005. "Improving California’s Bay Area Rapid Transit District Connectivity and Access with Segway Human Transporter and Other Low-Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9ps1910t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2004. "Improving Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Connectivity and Access with the Segway Human Transporter and Other Low-Speed Mobility Devices," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0z09g3kg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UCD-ITS-RR-08-33; Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4w92s6nj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.