IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt1pv6t7q9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

E-commerce, Warehousing and Distribution Facilities in California: A Dynamic Landscape and the Impacts on Disadvantaged Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Jaller, Miguell PhD
  • Qian, Xiaodong PhD
  • Zhang, Xiuli

Abstract

This work addresses the distribution of warehouses and distribution centers (W&DCs) influenced by e-commerce, through spatial analysis and econometric modelling. Specifically, this work analyzes the concentration of W&DCs in various metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) in California between 1989 and 2016-18; and studies the spatial relationships between W&DC distribution and other demographic and environmental factors through econometric modeling techniques. The work conducts analyses to uncover common trends in W&DC distribution. The analyses used aggregate establishment, employment, and other socio-economic information, complemented with transportation related variables. The results: 1) confirm that the weighted geometric centers of W&DCs have shifted slightly towards city central areas in all five MPOs; 2) W&DCs show a non-decreasing trend between 2008 and 2016; and 3) areas with more serious environmental problems are more likely to have W&DCs. A disaggregate analyses of properties sold and leased in one of the study regions shows a trend where businesses are buying or leasing smaller facilities, closer to the core of consumer demand. Among other factors, the growth of e-commerce sales, and expedited delivery services, which require proximity to the customers, may explain these trends. The study results provide insights for planners and policy decision makers, and will be of interest to practitioners, public and private entities, and academia. Caltrans, MPOs, and affiliated institutions of the National Center for Sustainable Transportation will directly benefit from the results as they want to avoid equity issues brought by the fast development of e-commerce, and its potential impact on W&DC distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaller, Miguell PhD & Qian, Xiaodong PhD & Zhang, Xiuli, 2020. "E-commerce, Warehousing and Distribution Facilities in California: A Dynamic Landscape and the Impacts on Disadvantaged Communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1pv6t7q9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1pv6t7q9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1pv6t7q9.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaller, Miguel & Pineda, Leticia, 2017. "Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5dz0j1gg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Jesse W.J. Weltevreden & Ton Van Rietbergen, 2007. "E‐Shopping Versus City Centre Shopping: The Role Of Perceived City Centre Attractiveness," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(1), pages 68-85, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaller, Miguel & Pahwa, Anmol & Zhang, Michael, 2021. "Cargo Routing and Disadvantaged Communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9qg2318x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Wang, Kailai & Chen, Zhenhua & Cheng, Long & Zhu, Pengyu & Shi, Jian & Bian, Zheyong, 2023. "Integrating spatial statistics and machine learning to identify relationships between e-commerce and distribution facilities in Texas, US," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Jaller, Miguel & Harvey, John & Rivera, Daniel & Kim, Changmo, 2020. "Research Brief: Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Freight Patterns in Southern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2h29004j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Jaller, Miguel & Pahwa, Anmol, 2020. "Analytical Modeling Framework to Assess the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Residential Deliveries, and Evaluate Sustainable Last-Mile Strategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4143j4pr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Jaller, Miguel & Rivera, Daniel & Harvey, John & Kim, Changmo & Lea, Jeremy, 2020. "Spatio‐Temporal Analysis of Freight Patterns in Southern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1259f9s1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesse W J Weltevreden & Ton van Rietbergen, 2009. "The Implications of E-Shopping for in-Store Shopping at Various Shopping Locations in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(2), pages 279-299, April.
    2. Jaller, Miguel & Pahwa, Anmol & Zhang, Michael, 2021. "Cargo Routing and Disadvantaged Communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9qg2318x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Yu Ding & Huapu Lu, 2017. "The interactions between online shopping and personal activity travel behavior: an analysis with a GPS-based activity travel diary," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 311-324, March.
    4. Shi, Kunbo & Shao, Rui & De Vos, Jonas & Cheng, Long & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Is e-shopping likely to reduce shopping trips for car owners? A propensity score matching analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Mateos-Mínguez, Paloma & Arranz-López, Aldo & Soria-Lara, Julio A. & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2021. "E-shoppers and multimodal accessibility to in-store retail: An analysis of spatial and social effects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Shi, Yishao & Tao, Tianhui & Cao, Xiangyang & Pei, Xiaowen, 2021. "The association between spatial attributes and neighborhood characteristics based on Meituan take-out data: Evidence from shanghai business circles," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Beckers, Joris & Cárdenas, Ivan & Verhetsel, Ann, 2018. "Identifying the geography of online shopping adoption in Belgium," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 33-41.
    8. Kunbo Shi & Long Cheng & Jonas De Vos & Yongchun Yang & Wanpeng Cao & Frank Witlox, 2021. "How does purchasing intangible services online influence the travel to consume these services? A focus on a Chinese context," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2605-2625, October.
    9. Zhou, Yiwei & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara), 2014. "Explore the relationship between online shopping and shopping trips: An analysis with the 2009 NHTS data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Shi, Kunbo & De Vos, Jonas & Cheng, Long & Yang, Yongchun & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "The influence of the built environment on online purchases of intangible services: Examining the mediating role of online purchase attitudes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 116-126.
    11. Weltevreden, Jesse W.J. & Rotem-Mindali, Orit, 2009. "Mobility effects of b2c and c2c e-commerce in the Netherlands: a quantitative assessment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 83-92.
    12. Zhen, Feng & Du, Xiaojuan & Cao, Jason & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2018. "The association between spatial attributes and e-shopping in the shopping process for search goods and experience goods: Evidence from Nanjing," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 291-299.
    13. Jaller, Miguel & Pahwa, Anmol, 2020. "Analytical Modeling Framework to Assess the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Residential Deliveries, and Evaluate Sustainable Last-Mile Strategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4143j4pr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Jiwu Wang & Xuewei Hu & Chengyu Tong, 2021. "Urban Community Sustainable Development Patterns under the Influence of COVID-19: A Case Study Based on the Non-Contact Interaction Perspective of Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Pahwa, Anmol & Jaller, Miguel, 2022. "A cost-based comparative analysis of different last-mile strategies for e-commerce delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Schade Katrin & Müller Andre & Holdack Eric & Hübscher Marcus & Lurie Katja & Schulze Juana, 2021. "Digitalization and City Center Resilience. Exploring Visitors’ Perceptions in Leipzig, Germany," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 65(3-4), pages 132-146, December.
    17. Cao, Xinyu (Jason), 2012. "The relationships between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process of search goods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 993-1002.
    18. Xinyu Cao & Zhiyi Xu & Frank Douma, 2012. "The interactions between e-shopping and traditional in-store shopping: an application of structural equations model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 957-974, September.
    19. Limon Barua & Bo Zou & Yan Zhou & Yulin Liu, 2023. "Modeling household online shopping demand in the U.S.: a machine learning approach and comparative investigation between 2009 and 2017," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 437-476, April.
    20. Orit Rotem-Mindali & Jesse Weltevreden, 2013. "Transport effects of e-commerce: what can be learned after years of research?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 867-885, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; Warehouses; freight terminals; logistics; e-commerce; freight traffic; urban sprawl; social equity; disadvantaged communities;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1pv6t7q9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.