IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt76b25769.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Costs and Profitability of Tobacco Compared to Other Crops in Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Keyser, John C.

Abstract

This study compares the financial costs and returns to tobacco growing with twelve (traditional and non-traditional) alternative crops, looking at profitability, costs, labor intensity, and production risks. It aims to provide an improved understanding of the trade-offs farmers face in deciding what crops to grow. This study finds that tobacco is a highly profitable cash crop for both large and small farmers. Tobacco would remain relatively profitable at considerably lower prices or yields than pertained in 2001. However, even for farmers in suitable agro-ecological areas, tobacco is expensive to grow, with high up-front costs and high labor requirements. Many commercial farmers have diversified sources of income, and most smallholder tobacco farmers grow only small amounts of tobacco, and grow other food and cash crops (maise, soybeans, cotton, groundnuts, and wheat) as part of a crop rotation system, to help provide a steady cash flow and/or as an essential part of their household food security strategy. In early 2001, there were about 2,000 large-scale commercial tobacco growers, and 16,000 tobacco-growing smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Simbabwe exports almost all of her tobacco crop, so if global demand for tobacco were to fall significantly in the future the impact on employment and the broader economy would depend on the extent to which commercial farmers were able to switch to other high value export crops, which are also highly labor intensive. It should be noted that some analysts predict robust or growing global tobacco demand, others predict a very gradual decline. Changes in Zimbabwe's land policy in 2001/2002 are likely to have a much larger impact on tobacco growing an exports and on the economy than demand-induced changes in the global market for tobacco.

Suggested Citation

  • Keyser, John C., 2002. "The Costs and Profitability of Tobacco Compared to Other Crops in Zimbabwe," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt76b25769, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt76b25769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/76b25769.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johnson, M., 2014. "Exploring strategic priorities for regional agricultural research and development investments in Southern Africa," IWMI Working Papers H046297, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Alois Mandondo & Laura German, 2015. "Customary rights and societal stakes of large-scale tobacco cultivation in Malawi," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(1), pages 31-46, March.
    3. Johnson, Michael E. & Benin, Samuel & You, Liangzhi & Diao, Xinshen & Chilonda, Pius & Kennedy, Adam, 2014. "Exploring strategic priorities for regional agricultural research and development investments in southern Africa:," IFPRI discussion papers 1318, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Harshana PVS, 2019. "Analysis of Satisfaction of Small Cucumber Contract Famers in Predominantly Agriculture areas in Sri Lanka," Annals of Social Sciences & Management studies, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 92-99, January.
    5. Jennifer Fang & Lauren De Souza & Julia Smith & Kelley Lee, 2020. "“All Weather Friends”: How China Transformed Zimbabwe’s Tobacco Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Midamba Dick Chune & Mustaf Mohamed Takoy & Odongkara Peter, 2022. "Analysis of technical efficiency and its determinants among tobacco producers in Uganda: An application of data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 12(1), June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt76b25769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.