IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt54b9m1sb.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke

Author

Listed:
  • Schick, Suzaynn
  • Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Schick, Suzaynn & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2005. "Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt54b9m1sb, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt54b9m1sb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/54b9m1sb.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnes, Deborah & Bero, Lisa A. Ph.D., 1997. "Scientific Quality of Original Research Articles on Environmental Tobacco Smoke," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt5tk8j863, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shane Allwright, 2008. "The impact of banning smoking in workplaces," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 81-92, July.
    2. Kamal Chaouachi, 2009. "Hookah (Shisha, Narghile) Smoking and Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS). A Critical Review of the Relevant Literature and the Public Health Consequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-46, February.
    3. Unknown, 2009. "Canadian Expert Panel on Tobacco Smoke and Breast Cancer Risk," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt5x79f22t, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    4. Maria Schulz & Alexander Gerber & David A. Groneberg, 2016. "Are Filter-Tipped Cigarettes Still Less Harmful than Non-Filter Cigarettes?—A Laser Spectrometric Particulate Matter Analysis from the Non-Smokers Point of View," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    5. Clement Kleinstreuer & Yu Feng, 2013. "Lung Deposition Analyses of Inhaled Toxic Aerosols in Conventional and Less Harmful Cigarette Smoke: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-32, September.
    6. Eun-Kyung Kim & Jina Choo, 2012. "Secondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Associated Factors among College Students on Campus and in the Home: A Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Chen-Guang Li & Gui-You Yang & Katrina L. Schmid & Li-Hua Huang & Guan-Hao He & Li Liu & Zeng-Liang Ruan & Wei-Qing Chen, 2019. "Associations between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Early Life and Astigmatism among Chinese Preschool Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Wande Li & Jing Zhou & Lijun Chen & Zhijun Luo & Yinzhi Zhao, 2011. "Lysyl Oxidase, A Critical Intra- and Extra-Cellular Target in the Lung for Cigarette Smoke Pathogenesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Kristi Pullen Fedinick & Ilch Yiliqi & Yukyan Lam & David Lennett & Veena Singla & Miriam Rotkin-Ellman & Jennifer Sass, 2021. "A Cumulative Framework for Identifying Overburdened Populations under the Toxic Substances Control Act: Formaldehyde Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Lene Seidler & Kylie E Hunter & Nicholas Chartres & Lisa M Askie, 2019. "Associations between industry involvement and study characteristics at the time of trial registration in biomedical research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. David Krauth & Andrew Anglemyer & Rose Philipps & Lisa Bero, 2014. "Nonindustry-Sponsored Preclinical Studies on Statins Yield Greater Efficacy Estimates Than Industry-Sponsored Studies: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt54b9m1sb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.