IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt2mq9m39h.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Proposition 28: Repeal of Proposition 10 Tobacco Surtax Initiative Statute

Author

Listed:
  • Magzamen, Sheryl MPH
  • Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D.

Abstract

Proposition 28, titled the Repeal of Proposition 10 Tobacco Surtax Initiative Statute, would repeal the $.50 tax per pack of cigarettes (and commensurate tax on other tobacco products) enacted on by Proposition 10, passed on November 3, 1998. Proposition 28 would dismantle the California Children and Families First Program, a statewide trust to fund programs for early childhood education, also enacted through Proposition 10. It also prohibits the passage of additional taxes on tobacco products by voter mandate. People are sensitive to the price of cigarettes and other tobacco products. Imposition of the 50 cent tax by Proposition 10 (combined with a wholesale price increase imposed by the tobacco industry to pay for the Master Settlement Agreement that ended state tobacco litigation) substantially reduced cigarette consumption. Repealing the tax could substantially increase cigarette consumption and associated disease and medical costs if the price of cigarettes drops. We analyzed two scenarios, which bracket the likely effects if Proposition 28 passes: 1. The tobacco industry raises wholesale prices to increase industry revenues. • Since there is no retail price change, there will be no changes in consumption or tobacco-related disease. • Industry revenues would increase by $617 million. 2. The tobacco industry does not change wholesale prices, so the retail price of cigarettes drops and consumption increases. • There would be an additional 114 million packs of cigarettes consumed, increasing industry revenues by $220 million. • There would be an increase in teen smoking, between 7,800 and 46,500 new youth smokers. • An additional 102 low birth weights due to maternal smoking, for an additional $2 million in direct medical costs for the first year following the repeal of the tax. • An additional combined total of 78 heart attacks and strokes for Californians over 35 years of age for an increase of $3 million in direct medical costs for the first year following the repeal of the tax. • Over the longer term, annual medical costs of smoking-induced disease will increase by $500 million annually, with an additional 1,800 annual deaths due to active smoking. • Increase in costs for diseases related to secondhand smoke, especially in childhood diseases caused or exacerbated by secondhand smoke including SIDS, middle ear infections, asthma, bronchitis, pneumonia, and lung cancer, including • 50 to 90 additional low birth weight infants • 5 additional cases of SIDS • 3,400-8,100 additional physician office visits for middle ear infections • 40 to 135 new asthma cases in children • 2,000 to 5,200 additional asthma attacks in children • 780 to 1,600 cases of bronchitis and pneumonia in children • 16 additional lung cancer deaths • 180 to 320 additional heart disease deaths These two cases bracket the likely effects of enactment of Proposition 28. The actual effect will probably be somewhere between these two scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Magzamen, Sheryl MPH & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2000. "Analysis of Proposition 28: Repeal of Proposition 10 Tobacco Surtax Initiative Statute," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt2mq9m39h, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt2mq9m39h
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2mq9m39h.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewit, Eugene M. & Coate, Douglas, 1982. "The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 121-145, August.
    2. Biener, L. & Aseltine Jr., R.H. & Cohen, B. & Anderka, M., 1998. "Reactions of adult and teenaged smokers to the Massachusetts tobacco tax," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(9), pages 1389-1391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong, MPH, Mi-Kyung & Barnes,, Richard L JD & Glantz,, Stanton PhD, 2007. "Tobacco Control in California 2003-2007: Missed Opportunities," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt7ck056qf, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wakefield, Melanie A PhD & Chaloupka, Frank J. PhD, 1999. "Effectiveness of Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs in Reducing Teenage Smoking: A Review," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt46n6b9mv, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    2. Hammar, Henrik & Carlsson, Fredrik, 2001. "Smokers' Decisions To Quit Smoking," Working Papers in Economics 59, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    3. Dee, Thomas S., 1999. "The complementarity of teen smoking and drinking," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 769-793, December.
    4. John Cawley & Davide Dragone & Stephanie Von Hinke Kessler Scholder, 2016. "The Demand for Cigarettes as Derived from the Demand for Weight Loss: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 8-23, January.
    5. Kan, Kamhon, 2007. "Cigarette smoking and self-control," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 61-81, January.
    6. Dennis C. McCornac, 1982. "The Effects of Government Regulation on Teenage Motor Vehicle Mortality," NBER Working Papers 1030, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Gregory J. Colman & Dahlia K. Remler, 2008. "Vertical equity consequences of very high cigarette tax increases: If the poor are the ones smoking, how could cigarette tax increases be progressive?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 376-400.
    8. Mark Stehr, 2007. "The effect of cigarette taxes on smoking among men and women," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(12), pages 1333-1343.
    9. Ida, Takanori & Goto, Rei & Takahashi, Yuko & Nishimura, Shuzo, 2011. "Can economic-psychological parameters predict successful smoking cessation?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 285-295, May.
    10. Jeffrey E. Harris & Sandra W. Chan, 1999. "The continuum‐of‐addiction: cigarette smoking in relation to price among Americans aged 15–29," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 81-86, February.
    11. Haque, Samiul & Abedin, Naveen & Fakir, Adnan M. S. & Hannan, Rafe & Alam, Rafa, 2019. "Effects of smoking on agricultural productivity," 2019 Annual Meeting, July 21-23, Atlanta, Georgia 291149, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Pierre Pestieau & Gregory Ponthiere, 2012. "Myopia, regrets, and risky behaviors," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 19(2), pages 288-317, April.
    13. Kajal Lahiri & Xian Li, 2020. "Smoking Behavior of Older Adults: A Panel Data Analysis Using HRS," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 18(3), pages 495-523, September.
    14. Keeler, Theodore E. & Hu, Teh-wei & Manning, Willard G. & Sung, Hai-Yen, 2001. "State Tobacco Taxation, Education and Smoking: Controlling for the Effects of Omitted Variables," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 54(n. 1), pages 83-102, March.
    15. Kevin Callison & Robert Kaestner, 2014. "Do Higher Tobacco Taxes Reduce Adult Smoking? New Evidence Of The Effect Of Recent Cigarette Tax Increases On Adult Smoking," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 155-172, January.
    16. Yi‐Wen Tsai & Chung‐Lin Yang & Chin‐Shyan Chen & Tsai‐Ching Liu & Pei‐Fen Chen, 2005. "The effect of Taiwan's tax‐induced increases in cigarette prices on brand‐switching and the consumption of cigarettes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 627-641, June.
    17. Gil-Lacruz, Ana I. & Gil-Lacruz, Marta, 2011. "Internal Inconsistency and Risk Aversion: Implications on Smoking Decisions/Consistencia interna y aversión al riesgo: implicaciones en la decisión de fumar," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 29, pages 387(18á.)-3, Abril.
    18. Sandra L. Decker & Amy Ellen Schwartz, 2000. "Cigarettes and Alcohol: Substitutes or Complements?," NBER Working Papers 7535, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Thorhildur Ólafsdóttir & Birgir Hrafnkelsson & Tinna Ásgeirsdóttir, 2015. "The Icelandic economic collapse, smoking, and the role of labor-market changes," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(4), pages 391-405, May.
    20. DeCicca, Philip & McLeod, Logan, 2008. "Cigarette taxes and older adult smoking: Evidence from recent large tax increases," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 918-929, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt2mq9m39h. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.