IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cbr/cbrwps/wp344.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

NHS Reforms and the Working Lives of Midwives and Physiotherapists

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Wilkinson
  • Anna Bullock
  • Brendan Burchell
  • Suzanne J. Konzelmann
  • Roy Maneklow

Abstract

From 2000 the NHS was subjected to a series of far reaching reforms, the purposes of which were to increase the role of the primary care sector in commissioning and providing services, promote healthier life styles, reduce health inequality, and improve service standards. These were seen as requiring a greater leadership role from health professionals, closer and more cooperative working between health professionals, and between health professionals, social services, and community and other service providers. The project surveyed a random sample of midwives and physiotherapists to investigate their perceptions of the effectiveness of the reforms, and their effects on working lives. The predominant perception was that NHS reforms had negatively affected the funding of their services; and had done little to improve service quality, delivery or organisation. Although the potential existed for the reforms to improve services, the necessary resources and required staffing were not made available and the objectives of the reforms were only partially secured by intensifying of work. The downside of this was a deterioration of the socio-psychological wellbeing of midwives and physiotherapists, especially the former, exacerbating the shortage of skilled and experienced. Shortage of staff and the associated increased work burdens were demoralising and demotivating; morale and job satisfaction declined, and job insecurity and labour turnover increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Wilkinson & Anna Bullock & Brendan Burchell & Suzanne J. Konzelmann & Roy Maneklow, 2007. "NHS Reforms and the Working Lives of Midwives and Physiotherapists," Working Papers wp344, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp344
    Note: PRO-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/cbrwp344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Morgan & Nigel Allington, 2002. "Has the Public Sector Retained its ‘Model Employer’ Status?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 35-42, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kulno Türk & Tõnu Roolaht, 2005. "A Comparison Of The Appraisal Systems And Appraisal-Compensation Interlinks Used By Estonian Public And Private Universities," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 41, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    2. Linda Colley & Shelley Woods & Brian Head, 2022. "Pandemic effects on public service employment in Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 56-79, March.
    3. Dan Coffey & Carole Thornley, 2014. "Shock, awe and continuity: Mrs Thatcher's legacy for the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 195-213, May.
    4. Tom Entwistle, 2005. "Why are Local Authorities Reluctant to Externalise (and Do They Have Good Reason)?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 23(2), pages 191-206, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Professional work; midwives; physiotherapists; Britain; public sector reforms; job satisfaction and morale;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J44 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Professional Labor Markets and Occupations
    • L84 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Personal, Professional, and Business Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ruth Newman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.