IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cbo/report/53921.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring the Costs of Federal Insurance Programs: Cash or Accrual?

Author

Listed:
  • Congressional Budget Office

Abstract

Following on a January 2018 report about using cash or accrual measures in federal budgeting, CBO assesses the advantages and disadvantages of those measures for federal insurance programs, including deposit insurance, flood insurance, and pension insurance. The report also describes a range of options for the expanding the use of accrual measures in the budget process.

Suggested Citation

  • Congressional Budget Office, 2018. "Measuring the Costs of Federal Insurance Programs: Cash or Accrual?," Reports 53921, Congressional Budget Office.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbo:report:53921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2018-12/53921-AccountingforInsurancePrograms_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Perry Beider & David Torregrosa, 2020. "Federal Reinsurance for Terrorism Risk and Its Effects on the Budget: Working Paper 2020-04," Working Papers 56420, Congressional Budget Office.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • H81 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Governmental Loans; Loan Guarantees; Credits; Grants; Bailouts
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbo:report:53921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbogvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.