IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug18/06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

admetan: A new, comprehensive meta-analysis command

Author

Listed:
  • David Fisher

    (MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL)

Abstract

Meta-analysis (MA) is a statistical technique for combining results from multiple independent studies, with the aim of estimating a single overall effect with a size, direction and precision consistent with the data. Traditionally, MA is performed on aggregated data (AD), where each observation represents the effect observed in a study, often derived from study publications. The user-written command metan (Harris et al. 2008) is by far the most popular Stata command for performing AD MA, but it was last updated in 2010 and has various flaws and limitations. The alternative to AD MA is to obtain and analyse individual participant data (IPD), where the totality of data from all studies are stacked to form a single, large dataset. I have previously described (Fisher 2015) a user-written command, ipdmetan, which facilitates so-called ‘two-stage’ IPD MA. The two stages are fitting a given model to the data from each study in turn and combining the results using AD techniques. The second stage, performed using the AD command admetan, has now been expanded into a fully comprehensive AD MA command, with all the functionality of metan and much more besides. The co-author and maintainer of metan, Ross Harris, has confirmed to me that he is no longer in a position to maintain it and is happy for admetan to take its place. Another important aspect of ipdmetan (and hence also admetan) is its forest plot capabilities. Not only is the forest plot engine much more efficient and capable of better plots ‘out of the box’ when compared with metan; it also allows the user to save and edit ‘forestplot results sets’ which are interpreted directly by the stand-alone program forestplot to produce fully flexible plots. I will take you on a quick tour of admetan and forestplot and hope to encourage you (and your colleagues and collaborators!) to use them in preference to metan.

Suggested Citation

  • David Fisher, 2018. "admetan: A new, comprehensive meta-analysis command," London Stata Conference 2018 06, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug18:06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2018/Stata2018Fisher.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ross J. Harris & Michael J. Bradburn & Jonathan J. Deeks & Roger M. Harbord & Douglas G. Altman & Jonathan A. C. Sterne, 2008. "metan: fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(1), pages 3-28, February.
    2. Babak Choodari-Oskooei & Tim P. Morris, 2016. "Quantifying the uptake of user-written commands over time," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 16(1), pages 88-95, March.
    3. David J. Fisher, 2015. "Two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis and generalized forest plots," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(2), pages 369-396, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zabaloy, Maria Florencia & Viego, Valentina, 2022. "Household electricity demand in Latin America and the Caribbean: A meta-analysis of price elasticity," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Kate Birnie & Rachel Cooper & Richard M Martin & Diana Kuh & Avan Aihie Sayer & Beatriz E Alvarado & Antony Bayer & Kaare Christensen & Sung-il Cho & Cyrus Cooper & Janie Corley & Leone Craig & Ian J , 2011. "Childhood Socioeconomic Position and Objectively Measured Physical Capability Levels in Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Da-Jung Ha & Jung-Hyun Park & Su-Eun Jung & Boram Lee & Myo-Sung Kim & Kyo-Lin Sim & Yung-Hyun Choi & Chan-Young Kwon, 2021. "The Experience of Emotional Labor and Its Related Factors among Nurses in General Hospital Settings in Republic of Korea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Colin Sumpter & Belen Torondel, 2013. "A Systematic Review of the Health and Social Effects of Menstrual Hygiene Management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Dennis Guignet & Matthew T. Heberling & Michael Papenfus & Olivia Griot, 2022. "Property Values, Water Quality, and Benefit Transfer: A Nationwide Meta-analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(2), pages 191-218.
    6. Sevigny, Eric L. & Fuleihan, Brian K. & Ferdik, Frank V., 2013. "Do drug courts reduce the use of incarceration?: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 416-425.
    7. Wm Christopher Mathews & Wollelaw Agmas & Edward Cachay, 2011. "Comparative Accuracy of Anal and Cervical Cytology in Screening for Moderate to Severe Dysplasia by Magnification Guided Punch Biopsy: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-9, September.
    8. Heather Klemick & Charles Griffiths & Dennis Guignet & Patrick Walsh, 2018. "Improving Water Quality in an Iconic Estuary: An Internal Meta-analysis of Property Value Impacts Around the Chesapeake Bay," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(2), pages 265-292, February.
    9. Roger M. Harbord & Julian P.T. Higgins, 2008. "Meta-regression in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(4), pages 493-519, December.
    10. Xiangpu Gong & Benjamin Fenech & Claire Blackmore & Yingxin Chen & Georgia Rodgers & John Gulliver & Anna L. Hansell, 2022. "Association between Noise Annoyance and Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Kontopantelis, Evangelos & Reeves, David, 2009. "MetaEasy: A Meta-Analysis Add-In for Microsoft Excel," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 30(i07).
    12. Heather Klemick & Charles Griffiths & Dennis Guignet & Patrick Walsh, 2015. "Explaining Variation in the Value of Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Using Internal Meta-analysis," NCEE Working Paper Series 201504, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Nov 2015.
    13. Jonathan Stokes & Maria Panagioti & Rahul Alam & Kath Checkland & Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi & Peter Bower, 2015. "Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-42, July.
    14. Zhengtao Liu & Huaijun Ning & Shuping Que & Linlin Wang & Xue Qin & Tao Peng, 2014. "Complex Association between Alanine Aminotransferase Activity and Mortality in General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Zhaowei Zhu & Jia Zhao & Yinghui Li & Chen Pang & Zhanwei Zhu & Xuepei Zhang, 2019. "Prognostic value of preoperative hydronephrosis in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Elise Van Kempen & Maribel Casas & Göran Pershagen & Maria Foraster, 2018. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-59, February.
    17. David Bilén & Anna Dreber & Magnus Johannesson, 2021. "Are women more generous than men? A meta-analysis," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Smith, William C. & Anderson, Emily & Salinas, Daniel & Horvatek, Renata & Baker, David P., 2015. "A meta-analysis of education effects on chronic disease: The causal dynamics of the Population Education Transition Curve," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 29-40.
    19. Branko Miladinovic & Iztok Hozo & Benjamin Djulbegovic, 2013. "Trial sequential boundaries for cumulative meta-analyses," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(1), pages 77-91, March.
    20. Christoph Bein & Anne H. Gauthier & Monika Mynarska, 2021. "Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(2), pages 443-472, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug18:06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.