IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/scon19/3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inference after lasso model selection

Author

Listed:
  • David Drukker

    (StataCorp)

Abstract

The increasing availability of high-dimensional data and increasing interest in more realistic functional forms have sparked a renewed interest in automated methods for selecting the covariates to include in a model. I discuss the promises and perils of model selection and pay special attention to estimators that provide reliable inference after model selection. I will demonstrate how to use Stata 16's new features for double selection, partialing out, and cross-fit partialing out to estimate the effects of variables of interest while using lasso methods to select control variables.

Suggested Citation

  • David Drukker, 2019. "Inference after lasso model selection," 2019 Stata Conference 3, Stata Users Group.
    • Handle: RePEc:boc:scon19:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/scon2019/chicago19_Drukker.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Leeb, Hannes, 2009. "On the distribution of penalized maximum likelihood estimators: The LASSO, SCAD, and thresholding," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 2065-2082, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luigi Guiso & Alexey Makarin, 2020. "Affinity, Trust, and Information," EIEF Working Papers Series 2020, Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (EIEF), revised Sep 2020.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kramlinger, Peter & Schneider, Ulrike & Krivobokova, Tatyana, 2023. "Uniformly valid inference based on the Lasso in linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Anders Bredahl Kock, 2012. "On the Oracle Property of the Adaptive Lasso in Stationary and Nonstationary Autoregressions," CREATES Research Papers 2012-05, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    3. Kascha, Christian & Trenkler, Carsten, 2011. "Bootstrapping the likelihood ratio cointegration test in error correction models with unknown lag order," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1008-1017, February.
    4. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney K. Newey, 2016. "Double machine learning for treatment and causal parameters," CeMMAP working papers 49/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Andreas Groll & Gerhard Tutz, 2017. "Variable selection in discrete survival models including heterogeneity," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 305-338, April.
    6. Carvalho, Carlos & Masini, Ricardo & Medeiros, Marcelo C., 2018. "ArCo: An artificial counterfactual approach for high-dimensional panel time-series data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 352-380.
    7. Marcelo C. Medeiros & Eduardo F. Mendes, 2015. "l1-Regularization of High-Dimensional Time-Series Models with Flexible Innovations," Textos para discussão 636, Department of Economics PUC-Rio (Brazil).
    8. Bo Sun & Siyuan Cheng & Jingdong Xie & Xin Sun, 2022. "Identification of Generators’ Economic Withholding Behavior Based on a SCAD-Logit Model in Electricity Spot Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Yoshimasa Uematsu & Takashi Yamagata, 2019. "Estimation of Weak Factor Models," DSSR Discussion Papers 96, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    10. Harold D. Chiang, 2018. "Many Average Partial Effects: with An Application to Text Regression," Papers 1812.09397, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    11. Stephen S. M. Lee & Mehdi Soleymani, 2015. "A Simple Formula for Mixing Estimators With Different Convergence Rates," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1463-1478, December.
    12. Tino Werner, 2022. "Asymptotic linear expansion of regularized M-estimators," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(1), pages 167-194, February.
    13. Ulrike Schneider, 2016. "Confidence Sets Based on Thresholding Estimators in High-Dimensional Gaussian Regression Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8-10), pages 1412-1455, December.
    14. Liu, Xiaodong & Prucha, Ingmar R., 2018. "A robust test for network generated dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 92-113.
    15. Farrell, Max H., 2015. "Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-23.
    16. Yoshimasa Uematsu & Takashi Yamagata, 2020. "Inference in Weak Factor Models," ISER Discussion Paper 1080, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    17. Randy C. S. Lai & Jan Hannig & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2015. "Generalized Fiducial Inference for Ultrahigh-Dimensional Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 760-772, June.
    18. Leeb, Hannes & Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Ewald, Karl, 2014. "On various confidence intervals post-model-selection," MPRA Paper 52858, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Hui Xiao & Yiguo Sun, 2019. "On Tuning Parameter Selection in Model Selection and Model Averaging: A Monte Carlo Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Tae-Hwy Lee & Zhou Xi & Ru Zhang, 2013. "Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity Using Regularized Artificial Neural Networks," Working Papers 201422, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2012.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:scon19:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.