Author
Abstract
This study critically evaluates Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR) in meeting its statutory mandates, particularly its adherence to the 90-day timeline for issuing rulings, the binding nature of its decisions, and its operational efficiency. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates qualitative insights from stakeholder interviews with quantitative analysis of advance rulings issued between January 2021 and August 2024. Comparative and institutional analyses benchmark CAAR’s performance against global best practices from jurisdictions such as the United States, Canada, and Australia. Findings reveal significant progress in decentralisation and stakeholder satisfaction compared to its predecessor, the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR). However, systemic inefficiencies persist, including delays caused by reliance on port commissioners for inputs, uneven workload distribution across benches, and limited nationwide applicability of rulings. Drawing on international models, the study proposes actionable reforms to enhance CAAR’s efficiency and alignment with global standards. Recommendations include establishing in-house technical expertise to reduce dependence on external inputs, adopting nationwide applicability of rulings, extending their validity period, and leveraging AI-driven tools for case management and drafting. Enhancing transparency through detailed public disclosures and implementing robust performance monitoring frameworks are also emphasised. By addressing identified gaps, CAAR can better serve domestic traders. The findings provide a foundation for reform to ensure CAAR’s long-term relevance and effectiveness.
Suggested Citation
Vijay Singh Chauhan & Prashant Narang & Monika Yadav, 2025.
"Decoding CAAR: Insights, Challenges, and Pathways for Reforms,"
Working Papers
11, Trustbridge Rule of Law Foundation.
Handle:
RePEc:bjd:wpaper:11
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjd:wpaper:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Latha Subramanian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/trustin.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.