IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bie/wpaper/223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Population and environmental quality

Author

Listed:
  • Cronshaw, Mark B.

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

  • Requate, Till

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

Abstract

This paper considers first best allocations in an economy where a consumption good is produced using labor. Production results in pollution, which is a public bad. Pollution abatement can be achiedved either by restricting poduction output or by using labor. We consider how the first best allocation varies with polulation size. consumers are unambiguously worse off when the population is larger. However, surprisingly, there is no single optimal policy on how pollution and labor should vary with population size. For standard models of preferences and technology it might be desirable either to increase or to reduce emissions and/or labor, depending on parameters. Despite such ambiguity in the first best level of emissions, the Pigouvian tax wihich implements the first best is a non-decreasing function of the population size. We conclude that, since the comparative statics of the first best are so ambiguous, sensible debate on environmental policy cannot proceed without a careful determination of actual preferences and technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Cronshaw, Mark B. & Requate, Till, 2017. "Population and environmental quality," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 223, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  • Handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2909809/2933882
    File Function: First Version, 1994
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sharifi, Farahnaz & Nygaard, Andi & Stone, Wendy M. & Levin, Iris, 2021. "Green gentrification or gentrified greening: Metropolitan Melbourne," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bettina Weingarten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imbiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.