IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_804_23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Connecting the dots of the international debate on the standardization and granularity of regulatory data

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Casa

    (Bank of Italy)

Abstract

The European banking reporting 'ecosystem' for statistical, prudential and resolution purposes has become increasingly complex and costly for both authorities and financial institutions. We are confronted with a significant number of surveys nowadays, combining aggregated, item-level and transactional data. The underlying business phenomena are often overlapping and not always defined in a consistent, integrated and reconcilable manner. Against this background, this paper tries to (i) connect the dots of the intense debate that has taken place in various European and international fora over the last five years, focusing on how to rationalize the overall reporting framework, and (ii) map out a possible way forward. Two main streams of innovative initiatives, high-level reports and studies are reviewed. The first aims to define a mandatory, common granular layer of multipurpose (integrated) data, located in banks' IT systems, which would provide programmable code to reference these data in order to generate the reporting of regulatory metrics. The second stream aims to standardize banks' operational systems by generating granular contractual information in near real-time. This paper argues that, despite the attempts to demonstrate the potential benefits of these innovative approaches, their adoption to replace the existing setup still appears premature even in the medium term. While exploring new ways to benefit from 'on demand' access to timely and integrated sources of data, the authorities in Europe have already launched strategic initiatives for the rationalization, standardization and integration of the existing reporting framework. In this respect, the ESCB's IReF and the wider integration initiative at European level, following the EBA's feasibility study, are important and tangible actions to significantly reduce the reporting burden on all stakeholders in the medium term. The cooperation between the European authorities and the banking industry will be key in achieving this general goal; this paper argues that the ESCB's BIRD would provide an important contribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Casa, 2023. "Connecting the dots of the international debate on the standardization and granularity of regulatory data," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 804, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_804_23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2023-0804/QEF_804_23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petros Kavassalis & Harald Stieber & Wolfgang Breymann & Keith Saxton & Francis Joseph Gross, 2018. "An innovative RegTech approach to financial risk monitoring and supervisory reporting," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 39-55, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dubey Vivek & Sonar Rakesh & Rohit S. Walimbe & Anindya Mohanty, 2020. "The Role of CLOUD in FinTech and RegTech," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 5-13.
    2. Yevheniia Polishchuk & Alla Ivashchenko & Oleksandr Dyba, 2019. "SMART-Contracts via Blockchain as the Innovation Tool for SMEs Development," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 39-53.
    3. Michael Becker & Kevin Merz & Rüdiger Buchkremer, 2020. "RegTech—the application of modern information technology in regulatory affairs: areas of interest in research and practice," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 161-167, October.
    4. Laura Grassi & Davide Lanfranchi, 2022. "RegTech in public and private sectors: the nexus between data, technology and regulation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 441-479, September.
    5. Mirza, Nawazish & Umar, Muhammad & Afzal, Ayesha & Firdousi, Saba Fazal, 2023. "The role of fintech in promoting green finance, and profitability: Evidence from the banking sector in the euro zone," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 33-40.
    6. Giuseppe Loiacono & Edoardo Rulli, 2022. "ResTech: innovative technologies for crisis resolution," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 227-243, September.
    7. Jörg Weking & Michael Mandalenakis & Andreas Hein & Sebastian Hermes & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "The impact of blockchain technology on business models – a taxonomy and archetypal patterns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 285-305, June.
    8. Simon Fernandez-Vazquez & Rafael Rosillo & David De La Fuente & Paolo Priore, 2019. "Blockchain in FinTech: A Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    standardization; granularity; integrated reporting; machine-executable reporting; smart contracts;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_804_23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.