IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bai/series/series_wp_08-2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Migration and development at home: Bitter or sweet return? Evidence from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Brzozowski

    (Cracow University of Economics)

  • Nicola Daniele Coniglio

    (Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro”)

Abstract

The existing economic literature focuses on the benefits that return migrants offer to their home country in terms of entrepreneurship, human and financial capital accumulation. However, return migration can have modest or even some detrimental effects if the migration experience was unsuccessful and/or if the migrant fails to reintegrate into the home country's economy. In our paper, we empirically show which factors - both individual characteristics and features related to the migration experience - influence the likelihood of a sub-optimal employment of returnees' human capital employing an original dataset on a representative sample of return migrants in Silesia (Poland).

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Brzozowski & Nicola Daniele Coniglio, 2016. "Migration and development at home: Bitter or sweet return? Evidence from Poland," SERIES 08-2016, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza - Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", revised Nov 2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:bai:series:series_wp_08-2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seriesworkingpapers.it/RePEc/bai/series/SERIES_WP_08-2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sukanta Chandra Swain & Sunil Kumar Padhi, 2020. "Economic Activities for Repatriated Migrant Workers of India: A Framework for Rural Development," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 749-755, October.
    2. Jan Brzozowski, 2017. "Immigrant Entrepreneurship and Economic Adaptation: A Critical Analysis," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(2), pages 159-176.
    3. Nyame-Asiamah, Frank & Amoako, Isaac Oduro & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Debrah, Yaw A., 2020. "Diaspora entrepreneurs’ push and pull institutional factors for investing in Africa: Insights from African returnees from the United Kingdom," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Małgorzata Bartosik-Purgat & Barbara Jankowska, 2017. "The Use of Social Networking Sites in Job Related Activities: A Cross-cultural Comparison," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(2), pages 177-193.
    5. Inese Šūpule, 2020. "Perceived Discrimination of Highly Educated Latvian Women Abroad," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Alin Croitoru, 2020. "Great Expectations: A Regional Study of Entrepreneurship Among Romanian Return Migrants," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    return migration; international migration; economic performance; regional development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • F22 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Migration
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bai:series:series_wp_08-2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Annalisa Vinella (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debarit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.