IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ays/ispwps/paper0213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis of Indonesia's Transfer System: Recent Performance and Future Prospects

Author

Abstract

Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia had been a slow-burning affair since the mid 1970s, with the country being one of the most centralized in the world, until the “Big Bang” of the 1999 reforms, when, in the period of one year, Indonesia became in terms of expenditure shares one of the most decentralized in the world. This paper first reviews the structure and performance of this new system of transfers in Indonesia and then focuses on the unfinished agenda for reform. The discussion concentrates on the DAU, which finances over three-fourths of subnational expenditures. The short story with the development of the equalization grant or DAU in Indonesia is that the Government in 2001 got the fundamental concepts right but got many of the particular details wrong. The performance of the DAU in addition was hindered by several choices made on the implementation of the new system, the most important being an extremely rigid interpretation of the hold harmless provision. The Government has proceeded to reform the DAU for 2002. Although real improvements took place in 2002, some important issues still remain, including how the new system may move away from the suffocating grip of the hold harmless provision. The government faces important challenges but also good opportunities in shaping and increasing the importance of the DAK conditional grant system. With respect to transfers in the form of revenue sharing on a derivation basis, where the central government shares revenues with the subnational governments where the revenues have been collected or derived, this paper recommends that government not develop it further but instead focuses on developing revenue autonomy of subnational governments. To answer how has Indonesia’s new transfer system performed so far this paper addresses more specific issues of: has budget autonomy been preserved, has revenue adequacy for provinces and district/municipalities been maintained, have transfers been stable, has the current system of transfers been reasonable, transparent, and simple, have transfers discouraged subnational tax effort, and have transfers been equalizing?

Suggested Citation

  • Bambang Brodjonegoro & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2002. "An Analysis of Indonesia's Transfer System: Recent Performance and Future Prospects," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0213, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper0213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://icepp.gsu.edu/files/2015/03/ispwp0213.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blane Lewis, 2001. "The New Indonesian Equalisation Transfer," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 325-343.
    2. James Alm & Robert Aten & Roy Bahl, 2001. "Can Indonesia Decentralise Successfully? Plans, Problems And Prospects," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 83-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. World Bank, 2003. "Decentralizing Indonesia : A Regional Public Expenditure Review Overview Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 14632, The World Bank Group.
    2. Gonschorek, Gerrit J. & Schulze, Günther G. & Sjahrir, Bambang Suharnoko, 2018. "To the ones in need or the ones you need? The political economy of central discretionary grants − empirical evidence from Indonesia," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 240-260.
    3. Yogi Vidyattama, 2013. "Regional convergence and the role of the neighbourhood effect in decentralised Indonesia," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 193-211, August.
    4. James Alm & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2002. "On the Use of Budgetary Norms as a Tool for Fiscal Management," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0215, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    5. Takahiro Akita & Sachiko Miyata, 2018. "Spatial Inequalities in Indonesia, 1996–2010: A Hierarchical Decomposition Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 829-852, August.
    6. Jameson Boex & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2005. "The Determinants of the Incidence of Intergovernmental Grants: A Survey of the International Experience (2005)," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0509, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    7. Aritenang, Adiwan F., 2008. "A Study on Indonesia Regions Disparity: Post Decentralization," MPRA Paper 25245, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2010.
    8. Coxhead, Ian, 2004. "International Trade and the Natural Resource 'Curse' in Southeast Asia: Does China's Growth Threaten Regional Development," Staff Paper Series 480, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2003. "Decentralizing Indonesia : A Regional Public Expenditure Review Overview Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 14632, The World Bank Group.
    2. Takahiro Akita & Sachiko Miyata, 2018. "Spatial Inequalities in Indonesia, 1996–2010: A Hierarchical Decomposition Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 829-852, August.
    3. Takahiro Akita & Awaludin Aji Riadi & Ali Rizal, 2021. "Fiscal disparities in Indonesia in the decentralization era: Does general allocation fund equalize fiscal revenues?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 1842-1865, December.
    4. Takahiro Akita & Awaludin Aji Riadi & Ali Rizal, 2019. "Fiscal Disparities in Indonesia under Decentralization: To What Extent Has General Allocation Grant(DAU) Equalized Fiscal Revenues?," Working Papers EMS_2019_05, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    5. Manof Shresta, 2002. "An Overview of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Nepal," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0205, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    6. Roger Montgomery & Sudarno Sumarto & Sulton Mawardi & Syaikhu Usman & Nina Toyamah & Vita Febriany & John Strain, 2002. "Deregulation Of Indonesia'S Interregional Agricultural Trade," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 93-117.
    7. Gertler, Paul J. & Gonzalez-Navarro, Marco & Gračner, Tadeja & Rothenberg, Alexander D., 2024. "Road maintenance and local economic development: Evidence from Indonesia’s highways," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. M A B Siddique & Heru Wibowo & Yanrui Wu, 2014. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Inequality in Indonesia: 1999-2008," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 14-22, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Reza Siregar, 2001. "Survey Of Recent Developments," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 277-303.
    10. Gertler, Paul J & Gonzalez-Navarro, Marco & Gracner, Tadeja & Rothenberg, Alexander, 2023. "Road Maintenance and Local Economic Development," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt38m633q0, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    11. Paul Deuster, 2002. "Survey Of Recent Developments," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 5-37.
    12. Coxhead, Ian, 2004. "International Trade and the Natural Resource 'Curse' in Southeast Asia: Does China's Growth Threaten Regional Development," Staff Paper Series 480, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    13. Milawati Milawati & Abdul Rozak Fahrudin, 2021. "How is the Performance of Education in Indonesia?," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 29-35.
    14. Peter Timmer, 2018. "Pro-poor growth in Indonesia: Challenging the pessimism of Myrdal's Asian Drama," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-103, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Kuncoro, Ari, 2002. "The new laws of decentralization and corruption in Indonesia:examination of provincial and district data," ERSA conference papers ersa02p053, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Blane D. Lewis, 2005. "Indonesian Local Government Spending, Taxing and Saving: An Explanation of Pre‐ and Post‐decentralization Fiscal Outcomes," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 291-317, September.
    17. Shah, Anwar & Qibthiyyah, Riatu & Dita, Astrid, 2012. "General purpose central-provincial-local transfers (DAU) in Indonesia : from gap filling to ensuring fair access to essential public services for all," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6075, The World Bank.
    18. Lewis, Blane D., 2003. "Local Government Borrowing and Repayment in Indonesia: Does Fiscal Capacity Matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1047-1063, June.
    19. Mari Pangestu & Miranda Swaray Goeltom, 2001. "Survey Of Recent Developments," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 141-171.
    20. Peter Timmer, 2018. "Pro-poor growth in Indonesia: Challenging the pessimism of Myrdal’s Asian Drama," WIDER Working Paper Series 103, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fiscal decentralization; Indonesia;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper0213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Benson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ispgsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.