IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/en8186.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Better together? A Study on Philanthropy and Official Development Assistance

Author

Listed:
  • Theo N.M. SCHUYT
  • Barry L.K. HOOLWERF
  • Dave VERKAIK

Abstract

Based on a survey among philanthropic foundations (N=55) from all continents with a total annual budget for charitable goals of approx. 10,2 billion USD in 2015 (N=44), this study sheds light on the relationship between foundations and official development assistance (ODA), on strategies, size and intervention principles used by these foundations and identifies barriers and common ground for building mutually empowering relationships. Results show that foundations tend to focus on vulnerable groups (women, youngsters) in the poorest regions of the world. Most support takes the form of pro-actively searching for local partners in the global South to make grants aimed towards education, health, economic and community development. However, it should be noted that a significant percentage of the budget for charitable support is spent in the country that is home to the foundations. Experience in collaborating is mostly positive, perceived benefits outweigh the downsides and this perception becomes stronger as collaboration increases. Improved scalability is the most important benefit, increased bureaucracy and loss of flexibility most cited as perceived downside. Perceived gaps in collaborations are mutual agreement on expectations and accountability, degree of commitment to the partnership, communication, and the alignment of strategy, mission, and values. Ways to improve collaboration could be to match tasks with structures, and to focus on alignment of culture and values. A suggested typology, in which foundations were classified by their founders, motives and historical background, can be used for developing relationships with foundations.

Suggested Citation

  • Theo N.M. SCHUYT & Barry L.K. HOOLWERF & Dave VERKAIK, 2018. "Better together? A Study on Philanthropy and Official Development Assistance," Working Paper 50f1a144-c2f0-4315-bf47-b, Agence française de développement.
  • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en8186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2018-02-06-15-03/pr-57-Better%20together-Schuyt-Hoolwerf-Verkaik.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Fengler & Homi Kharas, 2011. "Delivering Aid Differently : Lessons from the Field," World Bank Publications - Reports 10108, The World Bank Group.
    2. Szirmai,Adam, 2005. "The Dynamics of Socio-Economic Development," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521520843, November.
    3. Fengler, Wolfgang & Kharas, Homi, 2011. "Delivering Aid Differently: Lessons from the Field," World Bank - Economic Premise, The World Bank, issue 49, pages 1-8, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    2. Petr Blizkovsky & Roman Emelin, 2020. "The Impact of Official Development Assistance on the Productivity of Agricultural Production in Ghana, Cameroon and Mali," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(2), June.
    3. Vikram Nehru, 2014. "The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank: should Asia have both?," Chapters, in: Masahiro Kawai & Peter J. Morgan & Pradumna B. Rana (ed.), New Global Economic Architecture, chapter 9, pages 197-214, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Yanzhe Zhang & Xiao Yu & Huizhi Zhang, 2019. "Addressing the Insufficiencies of the Traditional Development Aid Model by Utilizing the One Belt, One Road Initiative to Sustain Development in Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Han, Lu & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2015. "Aid Fragmentation or Aid Pluralism? The Effect of Multiple Donors on Child Survival in Developing Countries, 1990–2010," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 344-358.
    6. Nehru, Vikram, 2012. "The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank: Should Asia Have Both?," ADBI Working Papers 385, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    7. Miley, Jose, 2015. "Socio-economic developmental agenda- A study of developing nations," MPRA Paper 66899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Szirmai, Adam, 2012. "Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 406-420.
    9. Adam Szirmai, 2011. "Manufacturing and Economic Development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-075, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Majumder, Monoj Kumar & Raghavan, Mala & Vespignani, Joaquin, 2020. "Commodity price volatility, external debt and exchange rate regimes," Working Papers 2020-13, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    11. Asghar Khan & Ayaz Ahmad & Amjad Ali Dadda, 2017. "Pak-US Relations: Understanding of the Misunderstandings," Global Social Sciences Review, Humanity Only, vol. 2(2), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Kesidou, Effie & Szirmai, Adam, 2008. "Local Knowledge Spillovers, Innovation and Economic Performance in Developing Countries: A discussion of alternative specifications," MERIT Working Papers 2008-033, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Marissa Popma & Carel Roessingh, 2010. "The overseas Taiwanese in Belize," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(2), pages 120-141, June.
    14. David S. Jacks & Kevin H. O'Rourke & Jeffrey G. Williamson, 2011. "Commodity Price Volatility and World Market Integration since 1700," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(3), pages 800-813, August.
    15. Voxi Heinrich AMAVILAH, 2016. "Social Obstacles to Technology, Technological Change, and the Economic Growth of African Countries: Some Anecdotal Evidence from Economic History," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 320-340, June.
    16. Naudé, Wim, 2011. "Entrepreneurship is Not a Binding Constraint on Growth and Development in the Poorest Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 33-44, January.
    17. Anna Łatuszyńska, 2012. "Overview of Approaches to Incorporate Dynamics into the Measurement of Complex Phenomena with the Use of Composite Indices," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 6(2), June.
    18. Monoj Kumar Majumder & Mala Valliammai Raghavan & Joaquin L. Vespignani, 2021. "Impact of commodity price volatility on external debt: the role of exchange rate regimes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(57), pages 6626-6640, December.
    19. Vertesy, D., 2014. "Successive leadership changes in the regional jet industry," MERIT Working Papers 2014-046, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Atif, Syed Muhammad & Mohazzam, Sardar, 2012. "Inclusive Growth Strategies for Pakistan ─ Myth or Reality for Policymakers," EconStor Preprints 65714, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en8186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.