IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2024-032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The relationship between workplace design, hybrid working choices and cohesion, identification and productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Jorrit Van Beurden
  • Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek
  • Lisanne Bergefurt
  • Pascale Le Blanc
  • Mathilda du Preez

Abstract

New experiences with working from home (WfH) during the COVID-19 pandemic have led to a global shift towards hybrid working. This option to incorporate flexibility in when and where to work seems to have become preferred by many employees and employers. Hybrid working can offer benefits such as reduced commuting time and improved work-life balance, however challenges like communication difficulties remain. Also, this shift to remote and hybrid work presents a significant change in employees' work patterns. Understanding the impact of hybrid working choices and both office and home workplace design on employees and organizations is crucial. Concerns include potential declines in organizational outcomes, such as individual and team productivity, workplace cohesion, and organizational identification. This study therefore explores the relationships between individual, job, and workplace characteristics and hybrid working modes with these organizational outcomes. The data for the statistical analyses stem from the employees of two Dutch office-based organisations that participated in the "Work in Transition (WiT)" research project, a collaboration between the Center for People & Buildings, Eindhoven University of Technology, and Delft University of Technology. Through an online survey, 6,414 office workers of these two (semi-)public organisations answered questions about their job, workplace at home and the office, personal characteristics, hybrid working choices and their perception of the mentioned organizational outcomes. Their answers were analysed with bivariate analyses. In addition, effect sizes were determined to identify the most meaningful relationships.Results show that particularly self-management skills, having shared workplaces at the corporate office, satisfaction with the home office, and workplace autonomy had the largest effects on the organizational outcomes. The findings emphasize the shift in office use towards collaborative tasks in the office and concentrated work at home. Recommendations include restructuring offices and providing support plans for home office setup and self-management skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorrit Van Beurden & Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek & Lisanne Bergefurt & Pascale Le Blanc & Mathilda du Preez, 2024. "The relationship between workplace design, hybrid working choices and cohesion, identification and productivity," ERES eres2024-032, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2024-032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2024-032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://architexturez.net/system/files/P_20240627165726_2448.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate real estate; Hybrid working; organisational outcomes; Self-Management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2024-032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.