Author
Listed:
- Anne Emblem
- Theis Theisen
Abstract
The Norwegian state housing bank offers economic subsidies to stimulate instalment of elevators in existing apartment buildings in which stairway is the only passageway. The subsidy constitutes about 50 percent of the total costs of installing elevators, provided that certain conditions are met. The political motivation for this subsidy is to reduce the likelihood that residents in such apartment buildings will have to relocate if their mobility is reduced, e.g., due to old age. In this paper we study the economics of investing in elevators, both from the societal point of view and from the residents’ point of view. Elevators might enable residents to continue to live in their apartment even if their health deteriorates. Hence, installation of elevators will have both monetary and non-monetary consequences. In this study, focus is placed mainly on the monetary implications of such an investment. An elevator may reduce the likelihood that residents suffer injuries associated with falls when climbing the stairs and subsequently also affect costs associated with health and social services. Moreover, installation of an elevator may enable residents to live in their apartment for a longer period, and subsequently alter the costs of public services, among which are housing, institutions and health and social services. About 70.000 Norwegians at the age of 80 years and older live in an apartment placed on the first floor or higher of a building without elevator. It is a political ambition to enable people to age in place, and for the health and social services to be provided in the recipients’ home. In this study, we estimate the potential societal economic savings from reduced need for public living arrangements and institutions, reduced traveling and time costs associated with provision of services to elderly residents, as well as expenditures associated with falls in stairs. Also, we estimate the resident’s potential private economic benefits from investing in elevators (as measured by changes in the market price of dwellings). Our findings will shed light on whether installation of elevators in older apartment buildings is economically beneficial to the society and consequently: whether the subsidy of a yearly 4,9 million EUR is economically justifiable from the societal point of view.
Suggested Citation
Anne Emblem & Theis Theisen, 2021.
"Installing Elevators in Old Apartment Buildings: Is it Worth the Costs and If So: For Whom?,"
ERES
eres2021_105, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
Handle:
RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2021_105
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2021_105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.