IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2014_37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving the energetic efficiency of residential buildings: empirical findings from financial evaluation of case studies in Northern Italy. Is it worthwhile?

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Copiello
  • Pietro Bonifaci

Abstract

The theme of buildings' energy efficiency occupies a prominent place on the agenda. This study aims to assess the convenience of improving the energy performance of residential buildings: higher costs to be incurred during construction or renovation are offset by lower operating costs? The point of view is purely financial, externalities are not considered. The evaluation model is set on the discounted cash flow analysis, and partly based on life cycle assessment methodology. Variables are simplified by comparing the incremental costs of investment with the savings achieved on energy supply cost.The model is applied to three case studies located in the Northern Italy. The first is related to the design of a new single-family house. The second and third cases concern the renovation of two different public housing estates. For all cases several improvement alternatives are analyzed.The estimate of the investments constitutes a critical element; the literature has shown that many thermo-economic studies may underestimate them, due to the lack of consideration of hidden costs. The discount rate is estimated as the opportunity cost of capital, and thus in a range representative for an household interested in investing in energy efficiency.Most of the alternatives analyzed are not feasible: the discounted amount of savings is not enough to fairly compensate or fully reimburse the investment. Additional simulations were performed, considering several trends of the future growth in energy prices. If the energy prices grow considerably, each of the project alternatives analyzed will exhibit a higher convenience, and some of them will become feasible within the time frame considered.The results of the research can be summarized as follows: investment in upgrading the energy efficiency of residential buildings currently lacks viability, in purely financial terms. Nevertheless, it can be interpreted, as a hedge against the risk that the prices of energy supply will grow significantly in the coming years. As original contribution, this research allows to highlight a new kind of energy efficiency paradox: improving buildings performance should allow to reduce both climate-altering emissions and, in an efficient market, the prices of energy supplies, but decreasing energy prices disincentive to invest in buildings improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Copiello & Pietro Bonifaci, 2014. "Improving the energetic efficiency of residential buildings: empirical findings from financial evaluation of case studies in Northern Italy. Is it worthwhile?," ERES eres2014_37, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2014_37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2014-37
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2014_37.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pietro Bonifaci, 2014. "The role of projects economic evaluation research in a Ph.D. Course focused in regional planning and public policy," ERES eres2014_edu_113, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Sergio Copiello, 2014. "From Real Estate Appraisal to Economic and Financial Evaluation of Projects: the experience of Architecture Faculties," ERES eres2014_edu_111, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2014_37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.