IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2007_146.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Covenant Strength and the Initial Yield: An Explicit and Calibrated Risk?

Author

Listed:
  • Norman E. Hutchison
  • Alastair Adair

Abstract

Under the traditional method of valuation, risk is implicit within the initial yield which is used to capitalise the net income into perpetuity. The yield is derived from the risk free rate, usually long-dated gilts, plus a risk premium (Hoesli and MacGregor, 2000). Where the risks are seen to be high, a higher risk premium should be added. Individual differences in the investments characteristics, such as covenant strength, are taken into account by subjective yield adjustments. The initial yield is obtained from sales comparables, with potentially only limited knowledge of the fine details associated with the transaction, such as the covenant strength default rating. This paper considers whether covenant strength risk is explicitly accounted for in the selection of the initial yield when valuing a commercial property investment, and if so, whether the associated risk premium can be directly calibrated to the credit score. The research extends previous work by the authors on Property Risk Scoring, which involves the analysis and scoring of the total risk of the property asset (Hutchison et al. 2005). his paper presents analysis of ICC credit scores of the top 25 retailers in the UK over the period 2002 to 2006, plus a case study approach to the covenant strength variability of two shopping centres to illustrate the key issues in calibrating the covenant strength risk premium when a composite initial yield is used. The paper also considers the manner in which covenant strength risk is reported to clients.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman E. Hutchison & Alastair Adair, 2007. "Covenant Strength and the Initial Yield: An Explicit and Calibrated Risk?," ERES eres2007_146, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2007_146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2007-146
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neil Dunse & Colin Jones & Michael White & Ed Trevillion & Lulu Wang, 2007. "Modelling Urban Commercial Property Yields: Exogenous and Endogenous Influences," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 335-354, January.
    2. Colin A. Jones, 2009. "Remaking the Monopoly Board: Urban Economic Change and Property Investment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(11), pages 2363-2380, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2007_146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.