IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v24y2007i4p335-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Urban Commercial Property Yields: Exogenous and Endogenous Influences

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Dunse
  • Colin Jones
  • Michael White
  • Ed Trevillion
  • Lulu Wang

Abstract

The starting point for this paper is the argument that increased weight of money into commercial property in this decade has led to a convergence of UK provincial city office yields. The paper begins by reviewing the concept of a property yield cycle and the notion of a city risk premium, and then considers exogenous and endogenous influences on the determination of urban office yields. This provides the framework for the empirical analysis. The study examines the trends in office yields in the major provincial office centres of the UK over a period of more than 20 years. It reviews the changing city risk premiums relative to the City of London, including their spread, over this period and relates this to the weight of money invested in different provincial cities. This descriptive analysis provides the context for the development of a formal model of local office yields that is tested with a panel regression. The findings suggest that there are some local or fixed effects on yields in different cities and that exogenous investment funds are a significant influence in the short term but not the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Dunse & Colin Jones & Michael White & Ed Trevillion & Lulu Wang, 2007. "Modelling Urban Commercial Property Yields: Exogenous and Endogenous Influences," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 335-354, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:24:y:2007:i:4:p:335-354
    DOI: 10.1080/09599910801916261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09599910801916261
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09599910801916261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman E. Hutchison & Alastair Adair, 2007. "Covenant Strength and the Initial Yield: An Explicit and Calibrated Risk?," ERES eres2007_146, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2007-146 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwabena Mintah & Woon-Weng Wong & Peng Yew Wong, 2020. "Cross Border Real Estate Investments and Commercial Office Property Market Performance: Evidence from Australia," International Real Estate Review, Asian Real Estate Society, vol. 23(2), pages 837-860.
    2. Norman Hutchison & Patricia Fraser & Alastair Adair & Rahul Srivatsa, 2012. "Regime shifts in ex post UK commercial property risk premiums," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 247-269, April.
    3. Kwabena Mintah & Woon-Weng Wong & Peng Yew Wong, 2020. "Cross Border Real Estate Investments and Commercial Office Property Market Performance: Evidence from Australia," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 211-234.
    4. Simeon Coleman & Vitor Leone, 2015. "An investigation of regime shifts in UK commercial property returns: a time series analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(60), pages 6479-6492, December.
    5. Colin A. Jones, 2009. "Remaking the Monopoly Board: Urban Economic Change and Property Investment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(11), pages 2363-2380, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin A. Jones, 2009. "Remaking the Monopoly Board: Urban Economic Change and Property Investment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(11), pages 2363-2380, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:24:y:2007:i:4:p:335-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.