IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/math-0602594.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Martingale selection problem and asset pricing in finite discrete time

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry B. Rokhlin

Abstract

Given a set-valued stochastic process $(V_t)_{t=0}^T$, we say that the martingale selection problem is solvable if there exists an adapted sequence of selectors $\xi_t\in V_t$, admitting an equivalent martingale measure. The aim of this note is to underline the connection between this problem and the problems of asset pricing in general discrete-time market models with portfolio constraints and transaction costs. For the case of relatively open convex sets $V_t(\omega)$ we present effective necessary and sufficient conditions for the solvability of a suitably generalized martingale selection problem. We show that this result allows to obtain computationally feasible formulas for the price bounds of contingent claims. For the case of currency markets we also give a comment on the first fundamental theorem of asset pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2006. "Martingale selection problem and asset pricing in finite discrete time," Papers math/0602594, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2006.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:math/0602594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0602594
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, Huyen & Touzi, Nizar, 1999. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing with cone constraints," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 265-279, March.
    2. (**), Christophe Stricker & (*), Miklós Rásonyi & Yuri Kabanov, 2002. "No-arbitrage criteria for financial markets with efficient friction," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 371-382.
    3. Walter Schachermayer, 2004. "The Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under Proportional Transaction Costs in Finite Discrete Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 19-48, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Burzoni & Mario Sikic, 2018. "Robust martingale selection problem and its connections to the no-arbitrage theory," Papers 1801.03574, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roux, Alet, 2011. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing in the presence of bid-ask and interest rate spreads," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 159-163, March.
    2. Alet Roux, 2007. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs," Papers 0710.2758, arXiv.org.
    3. Erhan Bayraktar & Yuchong Zhang, 2016. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing Under Transaction Costs and Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 1039-1054, August.
    4. Takaki Hayashi & Yuta Koike, 2017. "No arbitrage and lead-lag relationships," Papers 1712.09854, arXiv.org.
    5. Christoph Kuhn, 2023. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing with and without transaction costs," Papers 2307.00571, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    6. Kaval, K. & Molchanov, I., 2006. "Link-save trading," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 710-728, September.
    7. Emmanuel Denis & Yuri Kabanov, 2012. "Consistent price systems and arbitrage opportunities of the second kind in models with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 135-154, January.
    8. Martin Brown & Tomasz Zastawniak, 2020. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under fixed and proportional transaction costs," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 423-433, September.
    9. Tomasz Zastawniak, 2024. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under fixed and proportional costs in multi-asset setting and finite probability space," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 47(1), pages 137-149, June.
    10. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2021. "Risk measures beyond frictionless markets," Papers 2111.08294, arXiv.org.
    11. Bruno Bouchard, 2005. "No-arbitrage in discrete-time markets with proportional transaction costs and general information structure," Papers math/0501045, arXiv.org.
    12. Tokarz, Krzysztof & Zastawniak, Tomasz, 2006. "American contingent claims under small proportional transaction costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 65-85, December.
    13. Bruno Bouchard & Adrien Nguyen Huu, 2013. "No marginal arbitrage of the second kind for high production regimes in discrete time production-investment models with proportional transaction costs," Post-Print hal-00487030, HAL.
    14. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2006. "Constructive no-arbitrage criterion under transaction costs in the case of finite discrete time," Papers math/0603284, arXiv.org.
    15. Matteo Burzoni, 2015. "Arbitrage and Hedging in model-independent markets with frictions," Papers 1512.01488, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    16. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2014. "Consistent Price Systems under Model Uncertainty," Papers 1408.5510, arXiv.org.
    17. Christoph Kühn & Alexander Molitor, 2019. "Prospective strict no-arbitrage and the fundamental theorem of asset pricing under transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1049-1077, October.
    18. E. Babaei & I.V. Evstigneev & K.R. Schenk-Hoppé & M.V. Zhitlukhin, 2018. "Von Neumann-Gale Dynamics, Market Frictions, and Capital Growth," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1816, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    19. Jörn Sass & Martin Smaga, 2014. "FTAP in finite discrete time with transaction costs by utility maximization," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 805-823, October.
    20. Christoph Kuhn, 2018. "How local in time is the no-arbitrage property under capital gains taxes ?," Papers 1802.06386, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:math/0602594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.