IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2411.17072.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of the Assumptions for the Existence of a General Equilibrium

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Ahumada

Abstract

General Equilibrium Theory is the benchmark of economics, especially its results concerning the efficient allocation of resources, known as the First and Second Welfare Theorems. Yet, General Equilibrium Theory is beyond the scope of most economists. This paper is pitched as the first entry point into the theory. General Equilibrium Theory proves that at least one state of equilibrium always exists. In its most general approach, it uses fixed-point theorems to this end. This paper discusses the assumptions on individuals' behaviour and the structure of the system of exchange that guarantee that the conditions of the fixed-point theorems are satisfied. The purpose is to lay bare the role each plays in proving the existence of equilibrium and provide a clear picture of the relationship between the assumptions and the result. The discussion is presented in the simplest possible setting that captures the fundamental features of commodity exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Ahumada, 2024. "The Role of the Assumptions for the Existence of a General Equilibrium," Papers 2411.17072, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.17072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.17072
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mantel, Rolf R., 1974. "On the characterization of aggregate excess demand," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 348-353, March.
    2. Sonnenschein, Hugo, 1973. "Do Walras' identity and continuity characterize the class of community excess demand functions?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 345-354, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yariv, Leeat & Jackson, Matthew O., 2018. "The Non-Existence of Representative Agents," CEPR Discussion Papers 13397, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Momi, Takeshi, 2010. "Excess demand function around critical prices in incomplete markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 293-302, May.
    3. Ghiglino, Christian & Tvede, Mich, 1997. "Multiplicity of Equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Charalambos Aliprantis & Kim Border & Owen Burkinshaw, 1996. "Market economies with many commodities," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 19(1), pages 113-185, March.
    5. Gerard Ballot & Antoine Mandel & Annick Vignes, 2015. "Agent-based modeling and economic theory: where do we stand?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 199-220, October.
    6. Chiappori, Pierre-Andre & Ekeland, Ivar & Browning, Martin, 2007. "Local disaggregation of negative demand and excess demand functions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 764-770, August.
    7. A. Fiori Maccioni, 2011. "The risk neutral valuation paradox," Working Paper CRENoS 201112, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    8. Joosten, Reinoud & Talman, Dolf, 1998. "A globally convergent price adjustment process for exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 15-26, January.
    9. Kubler, F. & Chiappori, P. -A. & Ekeland, I. & Polemarchakis, H. M., 2002. "The Identification of Preferences from Equilibrium Prices under Uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 403-420, February.
    10. Herbert Gintis & Antoine Mandel, 2012. "The Stability of Walrasian General Equilibrium," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 12065r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Apr 2013.
    11. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2016. "Stochastic representatitve agent," Economics Working Papers 1536, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    12. Chiappori, P. -A. & Ekeland, I. & Kubler, F. & Polemarchakis, H. M., 2004. "Testable implications of general equilibrium theory: a differentiable approach," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 105-119, February.
    13. Herings, P. Jean-Jacques, 2024. "Globally and universally convergent price adjustment processes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    14. Lu Zhang, 2017. "The Investment CAPM," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(4), pages 545-603, September.
    15. Hoover, Kevin D., 2006. "A Neowicksellian in a New Classical World: The Methodology of Michael Woodford's Interest and Prices," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 143-149, June.
    16. Sabiou M. Inoua & Vernon L. Smith, 2020. "The Classical Theory of Supply and Demand," Working Papers 20-11, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    17. David Colander, 2018. "How Economists Got It Wrong: A Nuanced Account," Chapters, in: How Economics Should Be Done, chapter 12, pages 163-189, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Piero Gottardi & Andreu Mas-Colell, 1999. "A Note on the Decomposition (at a Point) of Aggregate Excess Demand on the Grassmannian," Working Papers 99-11, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    19. Lars Peter Hansen & James J. Heckman, 1996. "The Empirical Foundations of Calibration," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 87-104, Winter.
    20. Sandomirskiy, Fedor & Ushchev, Philip, 2024. "The geometry of consumer preference aggregation," CEPR Discussion Papers 19100, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.17072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.