IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2401.14791.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ISP pricing and Platform pricing interaction under net neutrality

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Guijarro
  • Vicent Pla
  • Jose Ramon Vidal

Abstract

We analyze the effects of enforcing vs. exempting access ISP from net neutrality regulations when platforms are present and operate two-sided pricing in their business models. This study is conducted in a scenario where users and Content Providers (CPs) have access to the internet by means of their serving ISPs and to a platform that intermediates and matches users and CPs, among other service offerings. Our hypothesis is that platform two-sided pricing interacts in a relevant manner with the access ISP, which may be allowed (an hypothetical non-neutrality scenario) or not (the current neutrality regulation status) to apply two-sided pricing on its service business model. We preliminarily conclude that the platforms are extracting surplus from the CPs under the current net neutrality regime for the ISP, and that the platforms would not be able to do so under the counter-factual situation where the ISPs could apply two-sided prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Guijarro & Vicent Pla & Jose Ramon Vidal, 2024. "ISP pricing and Platform pricing interaction under net neutrality," Papers 2401.14791, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.14791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.14791
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belleflamme, Paul & Peitz, Martin, 2021. "The Economics of Platforms : Concepts and Strategy," LIDAM Reprints CORE 3185, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Economides, Nicholas & Tåg, Joacim, 2012. "Network neutrality on the Internet: A two-sided market analysis," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 91-104.
    3. Jean‐Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Two‐sided markets: a progress report," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 645-667, September.
    4. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2021. "The Economics of Platforms," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108710749, September.
    5. Jens-Uwe Franck & Martin Peitz, 2021. "Market Definition in the Platform Economy," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_259v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tetsuya Shinkai & Naoshi Doi, 2023. "Menu-pricing and Quality Decisions of a Platform Monopolist," Discussion Paper Series 252, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    2. Tetsuya Shinkai & Naoshi Doi, 2023. "Price and quality decision of a monopoly platform for transaction with shipping," Discussion Paper Series 252-2, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Jul 2023.
    3. Alessandro De Chiara & Juan José Ganuza & Fernando Gómez & Ester Manna & Adrián Segura, 2023. "Platform liability with reputational sanctions," Economics Working Papers 1868, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu, 2024. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Hotelling Linear Market Model with Network Connectivity," Discussion Paper Series 283, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    5. Jullien, Bruno & Pavan, Alessandro & Rysman, Marc, 2021. "Two-sided Markets, Pricing, and Network Effects," TSE Working Papers 21-1238, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    6. Yassine Lefouili & Leonardo Madio, 2022. "The economics of platform liability," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 319-351, June.
    7. Gustavo Berganti~nos & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2024. "The Shapley index for music streaming platforms," Papers 2411.07166, arXiv.org.
    8. Martin Peitz, 2023. "Governance and Regulation of Platforms," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_480, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    9. de Cornière, Alexandre & Mantovani, Andrea & Shekhar, Shiva, 2023. "Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Two-Sided Markets," TSE Working Papers 23-1464, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    10. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    11. Dyskeland, Ole Kristian & Foros, Øystein, 2023. "Multihoming and market expansion: Effects on media platforms’ pricing and content creation incentives," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    12. Kuchinke, Björn A. & Rösch, Jürgen, 2022. "Die Rolle des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks im Zeitalter von TikTok: Ökonomische Anmerkungen," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 167, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    13. de Cornière, Alexandre & Mantovani, Andrea & Shekhar, Shiva, 2023. "Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Two-Sided Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 18380, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Mary Clare Peate, 2023. "Why Are Some Social Media Sites Free to Use?," Page One Economics Newsletter, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, pages 1-5, May.
    15. D'Annunzio, Anna & Russo, Antonio, 2015. "Net Neutrality and internet fragmentation: The role of online advertising," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-47.
    16. Yifan Dou & D. J. Wu, 2021. "Platform Competition Under Network Effects: Piggybacking and Optimal Subsidization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 820-835, September.
    17. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Stocker, Volker & Stockhammer, Paul, 2019. "Ist Netzneutralität tatsächlich gut? Eine Neubewertung vor dem Hintergrund der Regulierung in den USA und in der EU sowie aktueller Forschungsergebnisse," Policy Notes 38, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Nicolas Curien, 2013. "Net Neutrality is Imperfect and Should Remain So!," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 22, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    19. Marc Bourreau & Frago Kourandi & Tommaso Valletti, 2015. "Net Neutrality with Competing Internet Platforms," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 30-73, March.
    20. Nicholas Economides, 2015. "Economic Features of the Internet and Network Neutrality," Working Papers 15-01, NET Institute.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.14791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.