IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2311.07936.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Occupied Processes: Going with the Flow

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin Tissot-Daguette

Abstract

We develop an It\^o calculus for functionals of the "time" spent by a path at arbitrary levels. A Markovian setting is recovered by lifting a process $X$ with its flow of occupation measures $\mathcal{O}$ and call the pair $(\mathcal{O},X)$ the occupied process. While the occupation measure erases the chronology of the path, we show that our framework still includes many relevant problems in stochastic analysis and financial mathematics. The study of occupied processes therefore strikes a middle ground between the path-independent case and Dupire's Functional It\^o Calculus. We extend It\^o's and Feynman-Kac's formula by introducing the occupation derivative, a projection of the functional linear derivative used extensively in mean field games and McKean-Vlasov optimal control. Importantly, we can recast through Feynman-Kac's theorem a large class of path-dependent PDEs as parabolic problems where the occupation measure plays the role of time. We apply the present tools to the optimal stopping of spot local time and discuss financial examples including exotic options, corridor variance swaps, and path-dependent volatility.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin Tissot-Daguette, 2023. "Occupied Processes: Going with the Flow," Papers 2311.07936, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.07936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.07936
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christa Cuchiero & Wahid Khosrawi & Josef Teichmann, 2020. "A generative adversarial network approach to calibration of local stochastic volatility models," Papers 2005.02505, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    2. Christa Cuchiero & Francesco Guida & Luca di Persio & Sara Svaluto-Ferro, 2021. "Measure-valued affine and polynomial diffusions," Papers 2112.15129, arXiv.org.
    3. Breeden, Douglas T & Litzenberger, Robert H, 1978. "Prices of State-contingent Claims Implicit in Option Prices," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(4), pages 621-651, October.
    4. Julien-N. Hugonnier, 1999. "The Feynman–Kac Formula And Pricing Occupation Time Derivatives," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(02), pages 153-178.
    5. David G. Hobson & L. C. G. Rogers, 1998. "Complete Models with Stochastic Volatility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 27-48, January.
    6. Julien Guyon & Jordan Lekeufack, 2023. "Volatility is (mostly) path-dependent," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1221-1258, September.
    7. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    8. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    9. Dawson, D. A., 1975. "Stochastic evolution equations and related measure processes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 1-52, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    2. Duffie, Darrell, 2003. "Intertemporal asset pricing theory," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 639-742, Elsevier.
    3. Nelson Vadori, 2022. "Calibration of Derivative Pricing Models: a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Perspective," Papers 2203.06865, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    4. Jason Brown & Nida Çakır Melek & Johannes Matschke & Sai Sattiraju, 2023. "The Missing Tail Risk in Option Prices," Research Working Paper RWP 23-02, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    5. Lukas Gonon, 2022. "Deep neural network expressivity for optimal stopping problems," Papers 2210.10443, arXiv.org.
    6. Simon Scheidegger & Adrien Treccani, 2021. "Pricing American Options under High-Dimensional Models with Recursive Adaptive Sparse Expectations [Telling from Discrete Data Whether the Underlying Continuous-Time Model Is a Diffusion]," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 258-290.
    7. J. C. Arismendi & Marcel Prokopczuk, 2016. "A moment-based analytic approximation of the risk-neutral density of American options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 409-444, November.
    8. Secomandi, Nicola & Seppi, Duane J., 2014. "Real Options and Merchant Operations of Energy and Other Commodities," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 6(3-4), pages 161-331, July.
    9. Weihan Li & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan & Pakorn Aschakulporn, 2024. "An empirical study on the early exercise premium of American options: Evidence from OEX and XEO options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1117-1153, July.
    10. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    11. Work, James & Hauer, Grant & Luckert, M.K. (Marty), 2018. "What ethanol prices would induce growers to switch from agriculture to poplar in Alberta? A multiple options approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 51-62.
    12. Kathrin Glau & Ricardo Pachon & Christian Potz, 2019. "Speed-up credit exposure calculations for pricing and risk management," Papers 1912.01280, arXiv.org.
    13. Dong, Wenfeng & Kang, Boda, 2019. "Analysis of a multiple year gas sales agreement with make-up, carry-forward and indexation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 76-96.
    14. Pringles, Rolando & Olsina, Fernando & Penizzotto, Franco, 2020. "Valuation of defer and relocation options in photovoltaic generation investments by a stochastic simulation-based method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 846-864.
    15. Marta Biancardi & Giovanni Villani, 2017. "Robust Monte Carlo Method for R&D Real Options Valuation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 481-498, March.
    16. Gabriel J Power & Charli D. Tandja M. & Josée Bastien & Philippe Grégoire, 2015. "Measuring infrastructure investment option value," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 49-72, January.
    17. Stentoft, Lars, 2005. "Pricing American options when the underlying asset follows GARCH processes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 576-611, September.
    18. Gkousis, Spiros & Welkenhuysen, Kris & Harcouët-Menou, Virginie & Pogacnik, Justin & Laenen, Ben & Compernolle, Tine, 2024. "Integrated geo-techno-economic and real options analysis of the decision to invest in a medium enthalpy deep geothermal heating plant. A case study in Northern Belgium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. O. Samimi & Z. Mardani & S. Sharafpour & F. Mehrdoust, 2017. "LSM Algorithm for Pricing American Option Under Heston–Hull–White’s Stochastic Volatility Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 173-187, August.
    20. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.07936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.