IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2308.11138.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

NLP-based detection of systematic anomalies among the narratives of consumer complaints

Author

Listed:
  • Peiheng Gao
  • Ning Sun
  • Xuefeng Wang
  • Chen Yang
  • Riv{c}ardas Zitikis

Abstract

We develop an NLP-based procedure for detecting systematic nonmeritorious consumer complaints, simply called systematic anomalies, among complaint narratives. While classification algorithms are used to detect pronounced anomalies, in the case of smaller and frequent systematic anomalies, the algorithms may falter due to a variety of reasons, including technical ones as well as natural limitations of human analysts. Therefore, as the next step after classification, we convert the complaint narratives into quantitative data, which are then analyzed using an algorithm for detecting systematic anomalies. We illustrate the entire procedure using complaint narratives from the Consumer Complaint Database of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiheng Gao & Ning Sun & Xuefeng Wang & Chen Yang & Riv{c}ardas Zitikis, 2023. "NLP-based detection of systematic anomalies among the narratives of consumer complaints," Papers 2308.11138, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2308.11138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.11138
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiyue Liao & Guoqiang Chen & Ben Ku & Rahul Narula & Janet Duncan, 2020. "Text Mining Methods Applied to Insurance Company Customer Calls: A Case Study," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 153-163, January.
    2. Rachel M. Hayes & Feng Jiang & Yihui Pan, 2021. "Voice of the Customers: Local Trust Culture and Consumer Complaints to the CFPB," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 1077-1121, June.
    3. Nadezhda Gribkova & Ričardas Zitikis, 2018. "A User-Friendly Algorithm for Detecting the Influence of Background Risks on a Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dak-Adzaklo, Cephas Simon Peter & Wong, Raymond M.K., 2024. "Corporate governance reforms, societal trust, and corporate financial policies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Lingzhi Chen & Ričardas Zitikis, 2020. "Quantifying and analyzing nonlinear relationships with a fresh look at a classical dataset of student scores," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1145-1169, August.
    3. Nadezhda Gribkova & Ričardas Zitikis, 2019. "Statistical detection and classification of background risks affecting inputs and outputs," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 77(1), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Yihui Pan & Elena S. Pikulina & Stephan Siegel & Tracy Yue Wang, 2022. "Do Equity Markets Care about Income Inequality? Evidence from Pay Ratio Disclosure," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(2), pages 1371-1411, April.
    5. Dou, Yiwei & Hung, Mingyi & She, Guoman & Wang, Lynn Linghuan, 2024. "Learning from peers: Evidence from disclosure of consumer complaints," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2).
    6. Wang, Yujie & Tsang, Albert & Xiang, Yi & Yan, Shuo, 2024. "How can regulators affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from regulatory disclosures of consumer complaints in the U.S," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    7. Jiandong Ren & Kristina Sendova & Ričardas Zitikis, 2019. "Special Issue “Risk, Ruin and Survival: Decision Making in Insurance and Finance”," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-7, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2308.11138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.