IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2307.15805.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equilibria and incentives for illiquid auction markets

Author

Listed:
  • Joffrey Derchu
  • Dimitrios Kavvathas
  • Thibaut Mastrolia
  • Mathieu Rosenbaum

Abstract

We study a toy two-player game for periodic double auction markets to generate liquidity. The game has imperfect information, which allows us to link market spreads with signal strength. We characterize Nash equilibria in cases with or without incentives from the exchange. This enables us to derive new insights about price formation and incentives design. We show in particular that without any incentives, the market is inefficient and does not lead to any trade between market participants. We however prove that quadratic fees indexed on each players half spread leads to a transaction and we propose a quantitative value for the optimal fees that the exchange has to propose in this model to generate liquidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Joffrey Derchu & Dimitrios Kavvathas & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2023. "Equilibria and incentives for illiquid auction markets," Papers 2307.15805, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2307.15805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.15805
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Songzi Du & Haoxiang Zhu, 2017. "What is the Optimal Trading Frequency in Financial Markets?," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(4), pages 1606-1651.
    2. Madhavan, Ananth, 1992. "Trading Mechanisms in Securities Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 607-641, June.
    3. Jusselin Paul & Mastrolia Thibaut & Rosenbaum Mathieu, 2021. "Optimal Auction Duration: A Price Formation Viewpoint," Post-Print hal-04558210, HAL.
    4. Weibing Huang & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Pamela Saliba, 2019. "From Glosten-Milgrom to the whole limit order book and applications to financial regulation," Papers 1902.10743, arXiv.org.
    5. Eric Budish & Peter Cramton & John Shim, 2015. "Editor's Choice The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race: Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1547-1621.
    6. Joffrey Derchu & Philippe Guillot & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2020. "AHEAD : Ad-Hoc Electronic Auction Design," Papers 2010.02827, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thibaut Mastrolia & Tianrui Xu, 2024. "Clearing time randomization and transaction fees for auction market design," Papers 2405.09764, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    2. Twu, Mia & Wang, Jianxin, 2018. "Call auction frequency and market quality: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 53-62.
    3. Haas, Marlene & Khapko, Mariana & Zoican, Marius, 2021. "Speed and learning in high-frequency auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Daniel Fricke & Austin Gerig, 2018. "Too fast or too slow? Determining the optimal speed of financial markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 519-532, April.
    5. Samuel Antill & Darrell Duffie, 2021. "Augmenting Markets with Mechanisms [Optimal Execution of Portfolio Transactions]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(4), pages 1665-1719.
    6. Mark Marner-Hausen, 2022. "Developing a Framework for Real-Time Trading in a Laboratory Financial Market," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 172, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    7. Eric M. Aldrich & Daniel Friedman, 2023. "Order Protection Through Delayed Messaging," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 774-790, February.
    8. Marlene Haas & Marius Andrei Zoican, 2016. "Beyond the Frequency Wall: Speed and Liquidity on Batch Auction Markets," Post-Print hal-01484805, HAL.
    9. Jun Aoyagi, 2019. "Strategic Speed Choice by High-Frequency Traders under Speed Bumps," ISER Discussion Paper 1050, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    10. Ravi Jagannathan, 2022. "On Frequent Batch Auctions for Stocks [Tail Expectation and Imperfect Competition in Limit Order Book Markets]," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17.
    11. Daniel Chen & Darrell Duffie, 2021. "Market Fragmentation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(7), pages 2247-2274, July.
    12. Notheisen, Benedikt & Marino, Vincenzo & Englert, Daniel & Weinhardt, Christof, 2019. "Trading stocks on blocks: The quality of decentralized markets," Working Paper Series in Economics 129, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    13. Eric Budish & Robin S. Lee & John J. Shim, 2024. "A Theory of Stock Exchange Competition and Innovation: Will the Market Fix the Market?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(4), pages 1209-1246.
    14. Eric M. Aldrich & Kristian López Vargas, 2020. "Experiments in high-frequency trading: comparing two market institutions," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 322-352, June.
    15. Zhang, Zeyu & Ibikunle, Gbenga, 2023. "The market quality effects of sub-second frequent batch auctions: Evidence from dark trading restrictions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Joffrey Derchu & Philippe Guillot & Thibaut Mastrolia & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2020. "AHEAD : Ad-Hoc Electronic Auction Design," Papers 2010.02827, arXiv.org.
    17. Roşu, Ioanid, 2019. "Fast and slow informed trading," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-30.
    18. Eibelshäuser, Steffen & Smetak, Fabian, 2022. "Frequent batch auctions and informed trading," SAFE Working Paper Series 344, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    19. Joshua Huang & Teresa Serra & Philip Garcia & Scott H. Irwin, 2022. "To batch or not to batch? The release of USDA crop reports," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(1), pages 143-154, January.
    20. Shiyang Huang & Bart Zhou Yueshen, 2021. "Speed Acquisition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3492-3518, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2307.15805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.