IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2210.16155.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

"Rust Belt" Across America: An Application of a Nationwide, Block-Group-Level Deprivation Index

Author

Listed:
  • Scott W Hegerty

Abstract

In the United States, large post-industrial cites such as Detroit are well-known for high levels of socioeconomic deprivation. But while Detroit is an exceptional case, similar levels of deprivation can still be found in other large cities, as well as in smaller towns and rural areas. This study calculates a standardized measure for all block groups in the lower 48 states and DC, before isolating "high-deprivation" areas that exceed Detroit's median value. These block groups are investigated and mapped for the 83 cities with populations above 250,000, as well as at the state level and for places of all sizes. Detroit is shown to indeed be unique not only for its levels of deprivation (which are higher than 95 percent of the country), but also for the dispersion of highly-deprived block groups throughout the city. Smaller, more concentrated pockets of high deprivation can be found in nearly every large city, and some cities below 20,000 residents have an even larger share of high-deprivation areas. Cities' percentages of high-deprivation areas are positively related to overall poverty, population density, and the percentage of White residents, and negatively related to the share of Black residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott W Hegerty, 2022. ""Rust Belt" Across America: An Application of a Nationwide, Block-Group-Level Deprivation Index," Papers 2210.16155, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2210.16155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.16155
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Noble & Gemma Wright, 2013. "Using Indicators of Multiple Deprivation to Demonstrate the Spatial Legacy of Apartheid in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 187-201, May.
    2. Michael Pacione, 2004. "The Geography Of Disadvantage In Rural Scotland," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(4), pages 375-391.
    3. Scott W Hegerty, 2019. "A Comparison of Tract-Level, Nationwide Indices of Economic Deprivation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 256-263.
    4. Burke, Amanda & Jones, Andy, 2019. "The development of an index of rural deprivation: A case study of Norfolk, England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 93-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott W. Hegerty, 2021. "Spatial Measures of Socioeconomic Deprivation: An Application to Four Midwestern Industrial Cities," Papers 2105.07821, arXiv.org.
    2. Otterbach, Steffen & Rogan, Michael, 2017. "Spatial Differences in Stunting and Household Agricultural Production in South Africa: (Re-)Examining the Links Using National Panel Survey Data," IZA Discussion Papers 11008, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Scott W. Hegerty, 2021. "Deprivation, Crime, and Abandonment: Do Other Midwestern Cities Have 'Little Detroits'?," Papers 2105.10567, arXiv.org.
    4. Fintel, Dieter von & Fourie, Johan, 2019. "The great divergence in South Africa: Population and wealth dynamics over two centuries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 759-773.
    5. Ronelle Burger & Servaas Berg & Sarel Walt & Derek Yu, 2017. "The Long Walk: Considering the Enduring Spatial and Racial Dimensions of Deprivation Two Decades After the Fall of Apartheid," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 1101-1123, February.
    6. Anda David & Nathalie Guilbert & Nobuaki Hamaguchi & Yudai Higashi & Hiroyuki Hino & Murray Leibbrandt & Muna Shifa, 2018. "Spatial poverty and inequality in South Africa: A municipality level analysis," SALDRU Working Papers 221, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    7. Ophélie Merville & Ludivine Launay & Olivier Dejardin & Quentin Rollet & Joséphine Bryère & Élodie Guillaume & Guy Launoy, 2022. "Can an Ecological Index of Deprivation Be Used at the Country Level? The Case of the French Version of the European Deprivation Index (F-EDI)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Otterbach, Steffen & Oskorouchi, Hamid Reza & Rogan, Michael & Qaim, Matin, 2021. "Using Google data to measure the role of Big Food and fast food in South Africa’s obesity epidemic," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Scott W. Hegerty, 2021. "Bank Density, Population Density, and Economic Deprivation Across the United States," Papers 2105.07823, arXiv.org.
    10. Feuillet, T. & Valette, J.F. & Charreire, H. & Kesse-Guyot, E. & Julia, C. & Vernez-Moudon, A. & Hercberg, S. & Touvier, M. & Oppert, J.M., 2020. "Influence of the urban context on the relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and obesity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. Umakrishnan Kollamparambil, 2021. "Non‐income effect of land ownership and tenure on subjective wellbeing in South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 89(2), pages 301-323, June.
    12. Tina Fransman & Derek Yu, 2018. "Multidimensional poverty in South Africa in 2001-2016," Working Papers 07/2018, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    13. Weimann, Amy & Dai, Dajun & Oni, Tolu, 2016. "A cross-sectional and spatial analysis of the prevalence of multimorbidity and its association with socioeconomic disadvantage in South Africa: A comparison between 2008 and 2012," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 144-156.
    14. Steinert, Janina Isabel & Cluver, Lucie Dale & Meinck, Franziska & Doubt, Jenny & Vollmer, Sebastian, 2018. "Household economic strengthening through financial and psychosocial programming: Evidence from a field experiment in South Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 443-466.
    15. Otterbach, Steffen & Rogan, Michael, 2017. "Spatial differences in stunting and household agricultural production in South African: (re-)examining the links using national panel survey data," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 13-2017, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    16. Suich, Helen & Pham, Trang & Yap, Mandy, 2024. "Individuals’ experiences of multidimensional poverty through the lenses of gender and age – Findings from South Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    17. David Clelland & Carol Hill, 2019. "Deprivation, policy and rurality: The limitations and applications of area-based deprivation indices in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(1), pages 33-50, February.
    18. Ward, Catherine D. & Shackleton, Charlie M., 2016. "Natural Resource Use, Incomes, and Poverty Along the Rural–Urban Continuum of Two Medium-Sized, South African Towns," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 80-93.
    19. Scott W. Hegerty, 2021. "How Unique is Milwaukee's 53206? An Examination of Disaggregated Socioeconomic Characteristics Across the City and Beyond," Papers 2105.06021, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2210.16155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.