IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2203.00684.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Awareness and use of quantitative decision-making methods in pharmaceutical development

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Thommes
  • Martin Oliver Sailer
  • Nicolas Bonnet
  • Alex Carlton
  • Juan J. Abellan
  • Veronique Robert

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry has experienced increasing costs and sustained high attrition rates in drug development over the last years. One proposal that addresses this challenge from a statistical perspective is the use of quantitative decision-making (QDM) methods to support a data-driven, objective appraisal of the evidence that forms the basis of decisions at different development levels. Growing awareness among statistical leaders in the industry has led to the creation of the European EFSPI/PSI special interest group (ESIG) on quantitative decision making to share experiences, collect best practices, and promote the use of QDM. In this paper, we introduce key components of QDM and present examples of QDM methods on trial, program, and portfolio level. The ESIG created a questionnaire to learn how and to what extent QDM methods are currently used in the different development phases. We present the main questionnaire findings, and we show where QDM is already used today but also where areas for future improvement can be identified. In particular, statisticians should increase their visibility, involvement, and leadership in cross-functional decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Thommes & Martin Oliver Sailer & Nicolas Bonnet & Alex Carlton & Juan J. Abellan & Veronique Robert, 2022. "Awareness and use of quantitative decision-making methods in pharmaceutical development," Papers 2203.00684, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2203.00684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.00684
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DiMasi, Joseph A. & Grabowski, Henry G. & Hansen, Ronald W., 2016. "Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 20-33.
    2. Nitin R. Patel & Suresh Ankolekar, 2015. "Dynamically Optimizing Budget Allocation for Phase 3 Drug Development Portfolios Incorporating Uncertainty in the Pipeline," Springer Books, in: Zoran Antonijevic (ed.), Optimization of Pharmaceutical R&D Programs and Portfolios, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 181-200, Springer.
    3. Eric W. Gibson, 2019. "Leadership in Statistics: Increasing Our Value and Visibility," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(2), pages 109-116, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dosis, Anastasios & Muthoo, Abhinay, 2019. "Experimentation in Dynamic R&D Competition," CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series 52, Centre for Research in Economic Theory and its Applications CRETA.
    2. Yusuke Oh & Koji Takahashi, 2020. "R&D and Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 20-E-7, Bank of Japan.
    3. Gamba, Simona & Magazzini, Laura & Pertile, Paolo, 2021. "R&D and market size: Who benefits from orphan drug legislation?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Branstetter, Lee & Chatterjee, Chirantan & Higgins, Matthew J., 2022. "Generic competition and the incentives for early-stage pharmaceutical innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    5. Sam Peltzman, 2022. "“The theory of economic regulation” after 50 years," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 7-21, October.
    6. Unsal, Omer & Houston, Reza, 2024. "R&D grants and medical innovation," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Bae, Joonhyung & Ozmel, Umit, 2024. "The interplay between product development failures and alliance portfolio properties in the formation of exploration versus exploitation alliances," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Alfred B. Ordman, 2022. "When Will the FDA Do What Is in People’s Best Interests?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(4), pages 721-751, September.
    9. Dubois, Pierre & Gandhi, Ashvin & Vasserman, Shoshana, 2022. "Bargaining and International Reference Pricing in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Research Papers 3889, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    10. Edouard Debonneuil & Anne Eyraud-Loisel & Frédéric Planchet, 2018. "Can Pension Funds Partially Manage Longevity Risk by Investing in a Longevity Megafund?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, July.
    11. Thakur-Wernz, Pooja & Bruyaka, Olga & Contractor, Farok, 2020. "Antecedents and relative performance of sourcing choices for new product development projects," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    12. Billette de Villemeur, Etienne & Versaevel, Bruno, 2019. "One lab, two firms, many possibilities: On R&D outsourcing in the biopharmaceutical industry," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 260-283.
    13. Joshua Krieger & Danielle Li & Dimitris Papanikolaou, 2022. "Missing Novelty in Drug Development," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(2), pages 636-679.
    14. Maya M. Durvasula & Sabri Eyuboglu & David M. Ritzwoller, 2024. "Distilling Data from Large Language Models: An Application to Research Productivity Measurement," Papers 2405.08030, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    15. Fabian Gaessler & Stefan Wagner, 2022. "Patents, Data Exclusivity, and the Development of New Drugs," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(3), pages 571-586, May.
    16. Vincenzo Atella & Joanna Kopinska, 2018. "New Technologies and Costs," CEIS Research Paper 442, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 09 Aug 2018.
    17. Yixiang Ruan & Chenyin Lu & Ning Xu & Yuchen He & Yixin Chen & Jian Zhang & Jun Xuan & Jianzhang Pan & Qun Fang & Hanyu Gao & Xiaodong Shen & Ning Ye & Qiang Zhang & Yiming Mo, 2024. "An automatic end-to-end chemical synthesis development platform powered by large language models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Hassan Heidari & Arash Refah Kahriz & Yousef Mohammadzadeh, 2019. "Stock market behavior of pharmaceutical industry in Iran and macroeconomic factors," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 255-277, August.
    19. Oliver, Edward & Kourouklis, Dimitrios & Jofre-Bonet, Mireia, 2024. "Do R&D tax credits impact pharmaceutical innovation? Evidence from a synthetic control approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(8).
    20. Gregor Dorfleitner & Felix Rößle, 2018. "The financial performance of the health care industry: a global, regional and industry specific empirical investigation," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(4), pages 585-594, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2203.00684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.