IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2110.13262.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Covariate Balancing Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not Adversarially Robust

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Babaei
  • Sina Alemohammad
  • Richard Baraniuk

Abstract

The first step towards investigating the effectiveness of a treatment via a randomized trial is to split the population into control and treatment groups then compare the average response of the treatment group receiving the treatment to the control group receiving the placebo. In order to ensure that the difference between the two groups is caused only by the treatment, it is crucial that the control and the treatment groups have similar statistics. Indeed, the validity and reliability of a trial are determined by the similarity of two groups' statistics. Covariate balancing methods increase the similarity between the distributions of the two groups' covariates. However, often in practice, there are not enough samples to accurately estimate the groups' covariate distributions. In this paper, we empirically show that covariate balancing with the Standardized Means Difference (SMD) covariate balancing measure, as well as Pocock's sequential treatment assignment method, are susceptible to worst-case treatment assignments. Worst-case treatment assignments are those admitted by the covariate balance measure, but result in highest possible ATE estimation errors. We developed an adversarial attack to find adversarial treatment assignment for any given trial. Then, we provide an index to measure how close the given trial is to the worst-case. To this end, we provide an optimization-based algorithm, namely Adversarial Treatment ASsignment in TREatment Effect Trials (ATASTREET), to find the adversarial treatment assignments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Babaei & Sina Alemohammad & Richard Baraniuk, 2021. "Covariate Balancing Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not Adversarially Robust," Papers 2110.13262, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2110.13262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.13262
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A. Bader & William E. Hart & Cynthia A. Phillips, 2005. "Parallel Algorithm Design for Branch and Bound," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: H J. G (ed.), Tutorials on Emerging Methodologies and Applications in Operations Research, chapter 0, pages 5-1-5-44, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lluís-Miquel Munguía & Shabbir Ahmed & David A. Bader & George L. Nemhauser & Yufen Shao, 2018. "Alternating criteria search: a parallel large neighborhood search algorithm for mixed integer programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Aniko Bartos & Botond Bertok, 2019. "Parameter tuning for a cooperative parallel implementation of process-network synthesis algorithms," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 551-572, June.
    3. Jan Gmys, 2022. "Exactly Solving Hard Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problems on Peta-Scale GPU-Accelerated Supercomputers," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2502-2522, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2110.13262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.