IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2109.09238.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Data-Driven Convergence Bidding Strategy Based on Reverse Engineering of Market Participants' Performance: A Case of California ISO

Author

Listed:
  • Ehsan Samani
  • Mahdi Kohansal
  • Hamed Mohsenian-Rad

Abstract

Convergence bidding, a.k.a., virtual bidding, has been widely adopted in wholesale electricity markets in recent years. It provides opportunities for market participants to arbitrage on the difference between the day-ahead market locational marginal prices and the real-time market locational marginal prices. Given the fact that convergence bids (CBs) have a significant impact on the operation of electricity markets, it is important to understand how market participants strategically select their CBs in real-world. We address this open problem with focus on the electricity market that is operated by the California ISO. In this regard, we use the publicly available electricity market data to learn, characterize, and evaluate different types of convergence bidding strategies that are currently used by market participants. Our analysis includes developing a data-driven reverse engineering method that we apply to three years of real-world data. Our analysis involves feature selection and density-based data clustering. It results in identifying three main clusters of CB strategies in the California ISO market. Different characteristics and the performance of each cluster of strategies are analyzed. Interestingly, we unmask a common real-world strategy that does not match any of the existing strategic convergence bidding methods in the literature. Next, we build upon the lessons learned from the existing real-world strategies to propose a new CB strategy that can significantly outperform them. Our analysis includes developing a new strategy for convergence bidding. The new strategy has three steps: net profit maximization by capturing price spikes, dynamic node labeling, and strategy selection algorithm. We show through case studies that the annual net profit for the most lucrative market participants can increase by over 40% if the proposed convergence bidding strategy is used.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehsan Samani & Mahdi Kohansal & Hamed Mohsenian-Rad, 2021. "A Data-Driven Convergence Bidding Strategy Based on Reverse Engineering of Market Participants' Performance: A Case of California ISO," Papers 2109.09238, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2109.09238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.09238
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruoyang Li & Alva Svoboda & Shmuel Oren, 2015. "Efficiency impact of convergence bidding in the california electricity market," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 245-284, December.
    2. Lester Hadsell & Hany A. Shawky, 2007. "One‐day forward premiums and the impact of virtual bidding on the New York wholesale electricity market using hourly data," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(11), pages 1107-1125, November.
    3. Akshaya Jha & Frank A. Wolak, 2019. "Can Financial Participants Improve Price Discovery and Efficiency in Multi-Settlement Markets with Trading Costs?," NBER Working Papers 25851, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Celebi, Metin & Hajos, Attila & Hanser, Philip Q, 2010. "Virtual Bidding: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 16-25, June.
    5. Birge, John R. & Hortaçsu, Ali & Mercadal, Ignacia & Pavlin, J. Michael, 2018. "Limits to arbitrage in electricity markets: A case study of MISO," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-533.
    6. Pengcheng You & Dennice F. Gayme & Enrique Mallada, 2019. "The Role of Strategic Load Participants in Two-Stage Settlement Electricity Markets," Papers 1903.08341, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    7. Hadsell, Lester, 2007. "The impact of virtual bidding on price volatility in New York's wholesale electricity market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 66-72, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou Fang, 2023. "Electricity Virtual Bidding Strategy Via Entropy-Regularized Stochastic Control Method," Papers 2303.02303, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hopkins, Caroline A., 2020. "Convergence bids and market manipulation in the California electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Guo, Nongchao & Lo Prete, Chiara, 2019. "Cross-product manipulation with intertemporal constraints: An equilibrium model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Pengcheng You & Dennice F. Gayme & Enrique Mallada, 2019. "The Role of Strategic Load Participants in Two-Stage Settlement Electricity Markets," Papers 1903.08341, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    4. Anna Schwele & Christos Ordoudis & Pierre Pinson & Jalal Kazempour, 2021. "Coordination of power and natural gas markets via financial instruments," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 505-538, October.
    5. Van Moer, Geert, 2019. "Electricity market competition when forward contracts are pairwise efficient," MPRA Paper 96660, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Demir, Sumeyra & Stappers, Bart & Kok, Koen & Paterakis, Nikolaos G., 2022. "Statistical arbitrage trading on the intraday market using the asynchronous advantage actor–critic method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Akshaya Jha & Frank A. Wolak, 2019. "Can Financial Participants Improve Price Discovery and Efficiency in Multi-Settlement Markets with Trading Costs?," NBER Working Papers 25851, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Leslie, Gordon W., 2021. "Who benefits from ratepayer-funded auctions of transmission congestion contracts? Evidence from New York," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Ketterer, Janina C., 2014. "The impact of wind power generation on the electricity price in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 270-280.
    10. Zhou Fang, 2023. "Electricity Virtual Bidding Strategy Via Entropy-Regularized Stochastic Control Method," Papers 2303.02303, arXiv.org.
    11. Zhang, Anthony Lee, 2022. "Competition and manipulation in derivative contract markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 396-413.
    12. David BENATIA & Etienne BILLETTE de VILLEMEUR, 2019. "Strategic Reneging in Sequential Imperfect Markets," Working Papers 2019-19, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    13. Jan Niklas Buescher & Daria Gottwald & Florian Momm & Alexander Zureck, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis on the Efficiency of European Intraday Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Kell, Nicholas P. & Santibanez-Borda, Ernesto & Morstyn, Thomas & Lazakis, Iraklis & Pillai, Ajit C., 2023. "Methodology to prepare for UK’s offshore wind Contract for Difference auctions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    15. Dormady, Noah C., 2014. "Carbon auctions, energy markets & market power: An experimental analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 468-482.
    16. Abban, Abdul Rashid & Hasan, Mohammad Z., 2021. "Solar energy penetration and volatility transmission to electricity markets—An Australian perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 434-449.
    17. Gauthier, Geneviève & Godin, Frédéric & Trudeau, Gabrielle, 2023. "Pricing inconsistency between the futures and Financial Transmission Right markets in North America," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Muñoz, Francisco D. & Suazo-Martínez, Carlos & Pereira, Eduardo & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2021. "Electricity market design for low-carbon and flexible systems: Room for improvement in Chile," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    19. Francisco D. Munoz & Sonja Wogrin & Shmuel S. Oren & Benjamin F. Hobbs, 2018. "Economic Inefficiencies of Cost-based Electricity Market Designs," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(3), pages 51-68, May.
    20. Mayyas, Ahmad & Chadly, Assia & Amer, Saed Talib & Azar, Elie, 2022. "Economics of the Li-ion batteries and reversible fuel cells as energy storage systems when coupled with dynamic electricity pricing schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2109.09238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.