IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2102.00208.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Time Series (re)sampling using Generative Adversarial Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Christian M. Dahl
  • Emil N. S{o}rensen

Abstract

We propose a novel bootstrap procedure for dependent data based on Generative Adversarial networks (GANs). We show that the dynamics of common stationary time series processes can be learned by GANs and demonstrate that GANs trained on a single sample path can be used to generate additional samples from the process. We find that temporal convolutional neural networks provide a suitable design for the generator and discriminator, and that convincing samples can be generated on the basis of a vector of iid normal noise. We demonstrate the finite sample properties of GAN sampling and the suggested bootstrap using simulations where we compare the performance to circular block bootstrapping in the case of resampling an AR(1) time series processes. We find that resampling using the GAN can outperform circular block bootstrapping in terms of empirical coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian M. Dahl & Emil N. S{o}rensen, 2021. "Time Series (re)sampling using Generative Adversarial Networks," Papers 2102.00208, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2102.00208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.00208
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Athey, Susan & Imbens, Guido W. & Metzger, Jonas & Munro, Evan, 2024. "Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the design of Monte Carlo simulations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ba Chu & Shafiullah Qureshi, 2023. "Comparing Out-of-Sample Performance of Machine Learning Methods to Forecast U.S. GDP Growth," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 1567-1609, December.
    2. Shafiullah Qureshi & Ba Chu & Fanny S. Demers, 2021. "Forecasting Canadian GDP Growth with Machine Learning," Carleton Economic Papers 21-05, Carleton University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nir Billfeld & Moshe Kim, 2024. "Context-dependent Causality (the Non-Nonotonic Case)," Papers 2404.05021, arXiv.org.
    2. Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde, 2020. "Simple Rules for a Complex World with Arti?cial Intelligence," PIER Working Paper Archive 20-010, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    3. Jonas Metzger, 2022. "Adversarial Estimators," Papers 2204.10495, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    4. Allison Koenecke & Hal Varian, 2020. "Synthetic Data Generation for Economists," Papers 2011.01374, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    5. Yves-C'edric Bauwelinckx & Jan Dhaene & Tim Verdonck & Milan van den Heuvel, 2023. "On the causality-preservation capabilities of generative modelling," Papers 2301.01109, arXiv.org.
    6. Tengyuan Liang, 2020. "How Well Generative Adversarial Networks Learn Distributions," Working Papers 2020-154, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    7. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde, 2021. "Has machine learning rendered simple rules obsolete?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 251-265, December.
    8. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2020. "Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions," Papers 2012.12550, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    9. Max H. Farrell & Tengyuan Liang & Sanjog Misra, 2021. "Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 181-213, January.
    10. Jiafeng Chen & Xiaohong Chen & Elie Tamer, 2021. "Efficient Estimation in NPIV Models: A Comparison of Various Neural Networks-Based Estimators," Papers 2110.06763, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    11. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2023. "Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(1), pages 1-41, January.
    12. Christian M. Dahl & Torben S. D. Johansen & Emil N. S{o}rensen & Christian E. Westermann & Simon F. Wittrock, 2021. "Applications of Machine Learning in Document Digitisation," Papers 2102.03239, arXiv.org.
    13. Kevin Han & Han Wu & Linjia Wu & Yu Shi & Canyao Liu, 2024. "Estimating Treatment Effects Using Observational Data and Experimental Data with Non-Overlapping Support," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, September.
    14. Chen, Jiafeng & Chen, Xiaohong & Tamer, Elie, 2023. "Efficient estimation of average derivatives in NPIV models: Simulation comparisons of neural network estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1848-1875.
    15. Jiafeng Chen & Xiaohong Chen & Elie Tamer, 2021. "Efficient Estimation of Average Derivatives in NPIV Models: Simulation Comparisons of Neural Network Estimators," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2319, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    16. Michael Pollmann, 2020. "Causal Inference for Spatial Treatments," Papers 2011.00373, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2102.00208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.