IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1910.07417.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Portfolio optimization in the case of an exponential utility function and in the presence of an illiquid asset

Author

Listed:
  • Ljudmila A. Bordag

Abstract

We study an optimization problem for a portfolio with a risk-free, a liquid, and an illiquid risky asset. The illiquid risky asset is sold in an exogenous random moment with a prescribed liquidation time distribution. The investor prefers a negative or a positive exponential utility function. We prove that both cases are connected by a one-to-one analytical substitution and are identical from the economic, analytical, or Lie algebraic points of view. It is well known that the exponential utility function is connected with the HARA utility function through a limiting procedure if the parameter of the HARA utility function is going to infinity. We show that the optimization problem with the exponential utility function is not connected to the HARA case by the limiting procedure and we obtain essentially different results. For the main three dimensional PDE with the exponential utility function we obtain the complete set of the nonequivalent Lie group invariant reductions to two dimensional PDEs according to an optimal system of subalgebras of the admitted Lie algebra. We prove that in just one case the invariant reduction is consistent with the boundary condition. This reduction represents a significant simplification of the original problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Ljudmila A. Bordag, 2019. "Portfolio optimization in the case of an exponential utility function and in the presence of an illiquid asset," Papers 1910.07417, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1910.07417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.07417
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Schied & Torsten Schöneborn, 2009. "Risk aversion and the dynamics of optimal liquidation strategies in illiquid markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 181-204, April.
    2. Phillip Monin & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2014. "On the Optimal Wealth Process in a Log-Normal Market: Applications to Risk Management," Staff Discussion Papers 14-01, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    3. Phillip Monin, 2014. "Hedging Market Risk in Optimal Liquidation," Working Papers 14-08, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    4. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    5. L. A. Bordag & I. P. Yamshchikov & D. Zhelezov, 2015. "Portfolio optimization in the case of an asset with a given liquidation time distribution," Post-Print hal-01186961, HAL.
    6. Phillip Monin & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2014. "On the optimal wealth process in a log-normal market: Applications to risk management," Journal of Financial Engineering (JFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(02), pages 1-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phillip Monin, 2014. "Hedging Market Risk in Optimal Liquidation," Working Papers 14-08, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    2. Ren Liu & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Marko H. Weber, 2014. "Rebalancing with Linear and Quadratic Costs," Papers 1402.5306, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    3. Nikolay A. Andreev, 2015. "Worst-Case Approach To Strategic Optimal Portfolio Selection Under Transaction Costs And Trading Limits," HSE Working papers WP BRP 45/FE/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Nikolay Andreev, 2019. "Robust Portfolio Optimization in an Illiquid Market in Discrete-Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Wai Mun Fong, 2018. "Synthetic growth stocks," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 162-168, May.
    6. Juan M. Romero & Jorge Bautista, 2016. "Exact solutions for optimal execution of portfolios transactions and the Riccati equation," Papers 1601.07961, arXiv.org.
    7. Takashi Kato, 2014. "An optimal execution problem with market impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 695-732, July.
    8. T. R. Hurd & Quentin H. Shao & Tuan Tran, 2016. "Optimal Portfolios of Illiquid Assets," Papers 1610.00395, arXiv.org.
    9. Anne Lavigne, 2006. "Gouvernance et investissement des fonds de pension privés aux Etats-Unis," Working Papers halshs-00081401, HAL.
    10. An Chen & Thai Nguyen & Thorsten Sehner, 2022. "Unit-Linked Tontine: Utility-Based Design, Pricing and Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Alan J. Auerbach, 1981. "Evaluating the Taxation of Risky Assets," NBER Working Papers 0806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Daniel Hern'andez-Hern'andez & Harold A. Moreno-Franco & Jos'e Luis P'erez, 2017. "Periodic strategies in optimal execution with multiplicative price impact," Papers 1705.00284, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    13. Hong, Claire Yurong & Lu, Xiaomeng & Pan, Jun, 2021. "FinTech adoption and household risk-taking," BOFIT Discussion Papers 14/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    14. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Auffret, Philippe, 2001. "An alternative unifying measure of welfare gains from risk-sharing," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2676, The World Bank.
    16. Luca De Gennaro Aquino & Sascha Desmettre & Yevhen Havrylenko & Mogens Steffensen, 2024. "Equilibrium control theory for Kihlstrom-Mirman preferences in continuous time," Papers 2407.16525, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    17. Chen, An & Hieber, Peter & Sureth, Caren, 2022. "Pay for tax certainty? Advance tax rulings for risky investment under multi-dimensional tax uncertainty," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 273, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    18. Mayank Goel & Suresh Kumar K., 2006. "A Risk-Sensitive Portfolio Optimisation Problem with Stochastic Interest Rate," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 5(3), pages 263-282, December.
    19. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    20. Yuqian Xu & Lingjiong Zhu & Michael Pinedo, 2020. "Operational Risk Management: A Stochastic Control Framework with Preventive and Corrective Controls," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1804-1825, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1910.07417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.