IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1908.04962.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can robust optimization offer improved portfolio performance?: An empirical study of Indian market

Author

Listed:
  • Shashank Oberoi
  • Mohammed Bilal Girach
  • Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty

Abstract

The emergence of robust optimization has been driven primarily by the necessity to address the demerits of the Markowitz model. There has been a noteworthy debate regarding consideration of robust approaches as superior or at par with the Markowitz model, in terms of portfolio performance. In order to address this skepticism, we perform empirical analysis of three robust optimization models, namely the ones based on box, ellipsoidal and separable uncertainty sets. We conclude that robust approaches can be considered as a viable alternative to the Markowitz model, not only in simulated data but also in a real market setup, involving the Indian indices of S&P BSE 30 and S&P BSE 100. Finally, we offer qualitative and quantitative justification regarding the practical usefulness of robust optimization approaches from the point of view of number of stocks, sample size and types of data.

Suggested Citation

  • Shashank Oberoi & Mohammed Bilal Girach & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2019. "Can robust optimization offer improved portfolio performance?: An empirical study of Indian market," Papers 1908.04962, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1908.04962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.04962
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Alves Portela Santos, 2010. "The Out-of-Sample Performance of Robust Portfolio Optimization," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 8(2), pages 141-166.
    2. Best, Michael J & Grauer, Robert R, 1991. "On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 315-342.
    3. Sebastián Ceria & Robert A Stubbs, 2006. "Incorporating estimation errors into portfolio selection: Robust portfolio construction," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 109-127, July.
    4. R.H. Tütüncü & M. Koenig, 2004. "Robust Asset Allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 157-187, November.
    5. B.V. Halldórsson & R.H. Tütüncü, 2003. "An Interior-Point Method for a Class of Saddle-Point Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 559-590, March.
    6. Jang Ho Kim & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2014. "Recent Developments in Robust Portfolios with a Worst-Case Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 103-121, April.
    7. Victor DeMiguel & Francisco J. Nogales, 2009. "Portfolio Selection with Robust Estimation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 560-577, June.
    8. Bernd Scherer, 2007. "Can robust portfolio optimisation help to build better portfolios?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(6), pages 374-387, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shashank Oberoi & Mohammed Bilal Girach & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2020. "Can Robust Optimization Offer Improved Portfolio Performance? An Empirical Study of Indian market," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 18(3), pages 611-630, September.
    2. Jang Ho Kim & Woo Chang Kim & Do-Gyun Kwon & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2018. "Robust equity portfolio performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 293-312, July.
    3. Jang Ho Kim & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2014. "Recent Developments in Robust Portfolios with a Worst-Case Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 103-121, April.
    4. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2022. "Robust portfolio selection problems: a comprehensive review," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3203-3264, September.
    5. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2021. "Robust Portfolio Selection Problems: A Comprehensive Review," Papers 2103.13806, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    6. Yuanyuan Zhang & Xiang Li & Sini Guo, 2018. "Portfolio selection problems with Markowitz’s mean–variance framework: a review of literature," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-158, June.
    7. Vaughn Gambeta & Roy Kwon, 2020. "Risk Return Trade-Off in Relaxed Risk Parity Portfolio Optimization," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Kolm, Petter N. & Tütüncü, Reha & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 356-371.
    9. Erindi Allaj, 2020. "The Black–Litterman model and views from a reverse optimization procedure: an out-of-sample performance evaluation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 465-492, October.
    10. Zhilin Kang & Zhongfei Li, 2018. "An exact solution to a robust portfolio choice problem with multiple risk measures under ambiguous distribution," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 87(2), pages 169-195, April.
    11. Woo Kim & Jang Kim & So Ahn & Frank Fabozzi, 2013. "What do robust equity portfolio models really do?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 141-168, May.
    12. André Alves Portela Santos, 2010. "The Out-of-Sample Performance of Robust Portfolio Optimization," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 8(2), pages 141-166.
    13. Jang Ho Kim & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2018. "Recent advancements in robust optimization for investment management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 183-198, July.
    14. Ramesh Adhikari & Kyle J. Putnam & Humnath Panta, 2020. "Robust Optimization-Based Commodity Portfolio Performance," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Panos Xidonas & Ralph Steuer & Christis Hassapis, 2020. "Robust portfolio optimization: a categorized bibliographic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 533-552, September.
    16. Chakrabarti, Deepayan, 2021. "Parameter-free robust optimization for the maximum-Sharpe portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 388-399.
    17. Fliege, Jörg & Werner, Ralf, 2014. "Robust multiobjective optimization & applications in portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 422-433.
    18. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Matthys, Felix, 2019. "Robust consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices can jump," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1-56.
    19. Giorgio Costa & Roy Kwon, 2020. "A robust framework for risk parity portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 447-466, September.
    20. Frank Fabozzi & Dashan Huang & Guofu Zhou, 2010. "Robust portfolios: contributions from operations research and finance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 191-220, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1908.04962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.