IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1705.00340.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk Minimization, Regret Minimization and Progressive Hedging Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Sun
  • Xinmin Yang
  • Qiang Yao
  • Min Zhang

Abstract

This paper begins with a study on the dual representations of risk and regret measures and their impact on modeling multistage decision making under uncertainty. A relationship between risk envelopes and regret envelopes is established by using the Lagrangian duality theory. Such a relationship opens a door to a decomposition scheme, called progressive hedging, for solving multistage risk minimization and regret minimization problems. In particular, the classical progressive hedging algorithm is modified in order to handle a new class of linkage constraints that arises from reformulations and other applications of risk and regret minimization problems. Numerical results are provided to show the efficiency of the progressive hedging algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Sun & Xinmin Yang & Qiang Yao & Min Zhang, 2017. "Risk Minimization, Regret Minimization and Progressive Hedging Algorithms," Papers 1705.00340, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1705.00340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.00340
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Sun & Qiang Yao, 2017. "On coherency and other properties of MAXVAR," Papers 1703.10981, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    2. PAVLO A. Krokhmal, 2007. "Higher moment coherent risk measures," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 373-387.
    3. Karthik Natarajan & Dessislava Pachamanova & Melvyn Sim, 2009. "Constructing Risk Measures from Uncertainty Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1129-1141, October.
    4. Aharon Ben‐Tal & Marc Teboulle, 2007. "An Old‐New Concept Of Convex Risk Measures: The Optimized Certainty Equivalent," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 449-476, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aharon Ben-Tal & Dimitris Bertsimas & David B. Brown, 2010. "A Soft Robust Model for Optimization Under Ambiguity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-2), pages 1220-1234, August.
    2. Geissel Sebastian & Sass Jörn & Seifried Frank Thomas, 2018. "Optimal expected utility risk measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 35(1-2), pages 73-87, January.
    3. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Melvyn Sim, 2014. "Distributionally Robust Convex Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1358-1376, December.
    4. Postek, K.S. & den Hertog, D. & Melenberg, B., 2015. "Computationally Tractable Counterparts of Distributionally Robust Constraints on Risk Measures (revision of CentER DP 2014-031)," Discussion Paper 2015-047, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Krokhmal, Pavlo A. & Soberanis, Policarpio, 2010. "Risk optimization with p-order conic constraints: A linear programming approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 653-671, March.
    6. Alexander Vinel & Pavlo A. Krokhmal, 2017. "Certainty equivalent measures of risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 75-95, February.
    7. Alois Pichler, 2024. "Connection between higher order measures of risk and stochastic dominance," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Marcus Ang & Jie Sun & Qiang Yao, 2018. "On the dual representation of coherent risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 29-46, March.
    9. Mengshi Lu & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2021. "A Review of Robust Operations Management under Model Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1927-1943, June.
    10. Postek, K.S. & den Hertog, D. & Melenberg, B., 2014. "Tractable Counterparts of Distributionally Robust Constraints on Risk Measures," Other publications TiSEM c3a1df3e-f338-4989-806a-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Zhiping Chen & Qianhui Hu, 2018. "On Coherent Risk Measures Induced by Convex Risk Measures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 673-698, June.
    12. Darinka Dentcheva & Spiridon Penev & Andrzej Ruszczyński, 2017. "Statistical estimation of composite risk functionals and risk optimization problems," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(4), pages 737-760, August.
    13. Postek, K.S. & den Hertog, D. & Melenberg, B., 2015. "Computationally Tractable Counterparts of Distributionally Robust Constraints on Risk Measures (revision of CentER DP 2014-031)," Other publications TiSEM eeb9c898-6943-4199-b747-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Postek, K.S. & den Hertog, D. & Melenberg, B., 2014. "Tractable Counterparts of Distributionally Robust Constraints on Risk Measures," Discussion Paper 2014-031, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Fertis, Apostolos & Baes, Michel & Lüthi, Hans-Jakob, 2012. "Robust risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 663-672.
    16. Maciej Rysz & Alexander Vinel & Pavlo Krokhmal & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2015. "A Scenario Decomposition Algorithm for Stochastic Programming Problems with a Class of Downside Risk Measures," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 416-430, May.
    17. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    18. Castro-Iragorri, Carlos & Gómez, Fabio & Quiceno, Nancy, 2024. "Worst-case higher moment risk measure: Addressing distributional shifts and procyclicality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Zhang, Nan & Jin, Zhuo & Li, Shuanming & Chen, Ping, 2016. "Optimal reinsurance under dynamic VaR constraint," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 232-243.
    20. Qinyu Wu & Fan Yang & Ping Zhang, 2023. "Conditional generalized quantiles based on expected utility model and equivalent characterization of properties," Papers 2301.12420, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1705.00340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.