IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1703.06351.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Election Predictions as Martingales: An Arbitrage Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nassim Nicholas Taleb

Abstract

We consider the estimation of binary election outcomes as martingales and propose an arbitrage pricing when one continuously updates estimates. We argue that the estimator needs to be priced as a binary option as the arbitrage valuation minimizes the conventionally used Brier score for tracking the accuracy of probability assessors. We create a dual martingale process $Y$, in $[L,H]$ from the standard arithmetic Brownian motion, $X$ in $(-\infty, \infty)$ and price elections accordingly. The dual process $Y$ can represent the numerical votes needed for success. We show the relationship between the volatility of the estimator in relation to that of the underlying variable. When there is a high uncertainty about the final outcome, 1) the arbitrage value of the binary gets closer to 50\%, 2) the estimate should not undergo large changes even if polls or other bases show significant variations. There are arbitrage relationships between 1) the binary value, 2) the estimation of $Y$, 3) the volatility of the estimation of $Y$ over the remaining time to expiration. We note that these arbitrage relationships were often violated by the various forecasting groups in the U.S. presidential elections of 2016, as well as the notion that all intermediate assessments of the success of a candidate need to be considered, not just the final one.

Suggested Citation

  • Nassim Nicholas Taleb, 2017. "Election Predictions as Martingales: An Arbitrage Approach," Papers 1703.06351, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1703.06351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.06351
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Carr, 2017. "Bounded Brownian Motion," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-11, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aubrey Clayton, 2019. "Election predictions are arbitrage-free: response to Taleb," Papers 1907.01576, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brigo, Damiano & Jeanblanc, Monique & Vrins, Frédéric, 2020. "SDEs with uniform distributions: Peacocks, conic martingales and mean reverting uniform diffusions," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(7), pages 3895-3919.
    2. Tianyao Chen & Xue Cheng & Jingping Yang, 2019. "Common Decomposition of Correlated Brownian Motions and its Financial Applications," Papers 1907.03295, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    3. Albert Cohen & Nick Costanzino, 2017. "A General Framework for Incorporating Stochastic Recovery in Structural Models of Credit Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Cheikh Mbaye & Fr'ed'eric Vrins, 2019. "An arbitrage-free conic martingale model with application to credit risk," Papers 1909.02474, arXiv.org.
    5. Zura Kakushadze, 2020. "Option Pricing: Channels, Target Zones and Sideways Markets," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 25-33.
    6. László Márkus & Ashish Kumar, 2021. "Modelling Joint Behaviour of Asset Prices Using Stochastic Correlation," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 341-354, March.
    7. Zura Kakushadze, 2020. "Option Pricing: Channels, Target Zones and Sideways Markets," Papers 2006.14121, arXiv.org.
    8. Samuel Drapeau & Yunbo Zhang, 2019. "Pricing and Hedging Performance on Pegged FX Markets Based on a Regime Switching Model," Papers 1910.08344, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    9. Albert Cohen, 2018. "Editorial: A Celebration of the Ties That Bind Us: Connections between Actuarial Science and Mathematical Finance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-3, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1703.06351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.